Now blog. We figured this was obvious.
https://t.co/uVJCBvGtiB
(But updated this time)
Thanks to everyone who contributed!
This blog will serve as a response to @octra's team.
Alexey, don't come for me about "doxing," that's answered at the end.
Now blog. We figured this was obvious.
https://t.co/uVJCBvGtiB
(But updated this time)
Thanks to everyone who contributed!
This blog will serve as a response to @octra's team.
Alexey, don't come for me about "doxing," that's answered at the end.
@0xdasha@octra@lambda0xE Also, we're happy to discuss directly with you instead of going back and forth like this.
How about we get together and we can discuss each point individually.
To start, the twink you linked is entirely fucking irrelevant.
The main reason why is that the Synesis president promoting Aleph shows that they were hoodwinked. We also don't postulate their innocence, just that the claims themselves are credible. The article archived does explain how they were duped.
Saying Synesis is bad is also just whataboutism, dork.
The image I linked also shows why the case was won. It was considered defamatory. How does it prove Kirill didn't lie?
We also, for some reason, are STILL NOT TOUCHING ON THE AUDIO OF KIRILL!!
@0xKant_@Cryptopathic@AltOnChain We updated the blog.
Additionally, the "addressing" of what we said was mostly concessions on Lambda's part.
Unrelated, pick another philosopher. I've seen too many Kants. Try Kripke, he's cool.
@0xdasha@max21e8@octra@lambda0xE You're unfortunately uninformed on this topic. If you'd like, I'm happy to explain to you what this was for (it is notable that I never wrote on this blog.)
How does one say this unironically?
The first part is verifiably wrong. We gave you the issues.
The second part is also wrong. You can't call OSINT random events when it's all sourced from official bodies and correlated with parsimony.
The case was thrown out of court because Synesis made an article about it before conclusion. See the second slide. Even if it was thrown out, it doesn't mean the events didn't happen. Why didn't you address what Kirill says in the voice messages? Why not address how it's clear Kirill is connected to these shells? Why not address literally any other part of the blog?
@octralex Alexey Tsereli when he realises a cryptographic break doesn't need to involve a retroactive breaking of spend-auth and can, instead, require certain things and yet still be consider a break.