Millions of Americans who supported @realDonaldTrump were also influenced by Andrew Tate’s message of personal responsibility, resilience, and challenging establishment narratives.
Whether people like him or not, Andrew has become one of the most influential voices for an entire generation of young men.
Many of his supporters were also part of the movement that reshaped the political conversation in the United States.
Now those same people are asking one simple question:
If the presumption of innocence and due process truly matter, why is an American citizen awaiting extradition reportedly being held under such severe conditions before being convicted?
If the principles America prides itself on only apply when they are politically convenient, then they are not principles they are slogans.
@realDonaldTrump@JDVance@PamBondi@TheJusticeDept@FBI
It is time for transparency, accountability, and equal application of the law.
Justice is tested most in the cases that generate the greatest controversy.
The most important thing is the Britain’s objective was to repeat the same strategy it used against Andrew and Tristan in Romania: to make him suffer, keep him under harsh conditions, and destroy his reputation and lose money while he remains innocent until proven guilty.
Britain fears Andrew will actually make it to trial, why? 2 reasons::
1.Concern about public scrutiny of the evidence. During a trial, the prosecution’s evidence, witness testimony, and investigative procedures are subject to rigorous examination and cross examination in open court.
If there are weaknesses or inconsistencies in the case, they may become apparent through the judicial process.
2.Public and institutional consequences. In a high profile case, an unsuccessful prosecution may attract significant public scrutiny, influence perceptions of similar cases, and raise broader questions about investigative methods and prosecutorial decision making.
Remember what’s happened in Romania? where the judge threw out the case files because the allegations were unsupported and lacked evidence?
According to this view, the exact same thing is happening now in Miami.
The judge reviewed what Britain had submitted, repeatedly shook her head from side to side, and handed the documents back because she concluded that there was no evidence supporting what Britain claimed to have.
Facts are stubborn things.
#freethetates
@Cobratate Millions follow you because they chose to, not because they had to. Whether people agree or disagree with your views, influence has to be earned. We love you G
#freethetates
@Cobratate The greatest danger to freedom is not disagreement it’s a government that believes it is above criticism. No president, no administration, and no agency should ever be beyond accountability.
@Cobratate The way the U.S. is treating Andrew Tate raises serious questions. If someone is presumed innocent, why are they being held under conditions that seem designed for punishment rather than due process?
@Cobratate The greatest danger to freedom is not disagreement it’s a government that believes it is above criticism. No president, no administration, and no agency should ever be beyond accountability.
@Cobratate No government should ever be comfortable with citizens questioning whether basic rights are being respected. The moment that becomes normal, democracy starts losing its meaning.
Shame on you America.
A government that fears scrutiny more than its own abuse of power has already lost its moral authority. Rights are meant to restrain the state, not disappear when someone becomes controversial. Every citizen should be paying attention.