High valuations in digital assets? Where to look for value? Turns out the only sector in digital assets where ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐-๐ญ๐จ-๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ (๐/๐) ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ฌ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐๐ญ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ lately is Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePINs).
Why this trend?
DePINs have experienced a combination of ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ญ๐๐ ๐ฏ๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ (๐ ๐๐๐ฌ) ๐๐ฅ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐๐๐ฒ ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐๐ง๐ฎ๐ ๐ ๐ซ๐จ๐ฐ๐ญ๐ก, resulting in a compression of P/S ratios over the past years.
Where is the contrast?
This trend is in contrast to other major crypto sectors like base infrastructure (L1, L2s, and L3s) and decentralized finance (DeFi):
- ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก๐๐ซ ๐/๐ ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ฌ: ๐๐๐ฌ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ (L1, L2s, and L3s)
- ๐๐จ๐ฐ๐๐ซ ๐/๐ ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ฌ: ๐๐๐ ๐ข, including perpetual protocols, decentralized exchanges (DEXs), lending platforms, and agent-based and liquid staking protocols.
Based on transaction fee revenues, ๐/๐ ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ฌ (๐๐, ๐๐, ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐), ๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ญ๐จ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ฌ ๐ก๐๐ฏ๐ ๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐๐๐ฒ, reflecting the relative re-rating of DePINs within the broader market.
Read my full analysis w/ @KoschigRobert of @1kxnetwork and @dylangbane of @MessariCrypto
๐
https://t.co/W19VCtLdua
โThe Scale Play: When DePIN Goes Industrialโ by Mihai Grigore (@Tech_Metrics), Jakob Linus Stammler, Daniel Ammann, Raphael Knechtli
Panel diving into the friction between Web3 speed and Web2 reliability in industrial DePIN.
๐๐ข๐ช๐ฎ๐ข๐๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ โ it drives valuations of digital assets. So is the case for decentralized networks.
๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐จ๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ฆ๐๐๐ง?
Despite similar revenues, certain decentralized networks have higher fully diluted valuations (FDVs) and price-to-sales (P/S) ratios than their peers.
๐๐จ๐ฐ ๐ฌ๐จ?
We looked at Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePINs) with publicly available data. The primary driver of this valuation premium appears to be deep token liquidity, especially when tokens are listed on major exchanges. This liquidity premium aligns with the valuation trends of the broader market.
๐๐ฑ๐๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ซ๐ญ
We segmented DePIN protocols based on liquidity depth and exchange listing status. A diagonal trend line effectively separates most listed from non-listed projects. Bubble sizes reflect current liquidity depth.
๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ : Exchange listings tend to correspond to larger bubbles, indicating deeper liquidity.
๐๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง:
- Projects situated in the upper-right quadrant, those combining deep liquidity with exchange listings, command significantly higher valuations relative to their revenues.
- Projects in the lower-left quadrant, which lack such listings and exhibit thinner liquidity, are valued more conservatively despite comparable revenue profiles.
Wanna look into the details?
Read my full analysis w/ @KoschigRobert of @1kxnetwork and @dylangbane of @MessariCrypto:
https://t.co/W19VCtKFEC
๐ VC Panel @ETHBucharest_ ๐ท๐ด
โLetโs get ugly quickly & make mistakes early.โ
๐ง AI x Blockchain = coordination power
๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝโ๐ Founders: obsession > code. Being technical isnโt a must anymore!
๐ฎ GameFi: big potential, but weโre early. Gamers resist switching games or adopting asset portability
๐ Tokenomics wonโt save weak products
@cleanunicorn @lior_eth @vicimikul @EthanPierse
@tech_metrics
#ETHBucharest #Web3 #GameFi #CryptoVC #AIxBlockchain
How profitable is it to run decentralized infrastructure? Looked at profit margins for Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePINs):
For ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐น ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ก๐ฒ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ (๐๐ฅ๐ก๐), reward based profit margins range from 0% to 200%. ๐๐ฅ๐ก๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐ฒ๐ด๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ต๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ณ๐ถ๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐, e.g., Livepeer, The Graph, Filecoin, and Covalent.
In contrast, ๐ฃ๐ต๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ก๐ฒ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ (๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ก๐) typically achieve:
โข ~๐ฑ๐ฌ% profit margins ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ผ๐-๐๐ผ๐๐ ๐ก๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐: e.g., Dimo, Helium, or Arkreen where nodes cost several hundred dollars at most.
โข ~๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฌ% ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ฒ profit margins ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ-๐๐ผ๐๐ ๐ก๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐: e.g., Helium Mobile, XNET, WeatherXM, Hivemapper, and GEODNET, where the nodes start at $400.
For details and assumptions, check my full research w/ @KoschigRobert (@1kxnetwork ) and @dylangbane (@MessariCrypto) on token rewards in DePINs: https://t.co/uRvQc5Mqf7
Today, we @1kxnetwork release Part 2 of our DePIN Tokenomics Series with @dylangbane and @tech_metrics from @MessariCrypto.
We analyzed the reward mechanisms of 27 DePINs - here's what the data reveals ๐งต
Is there a right balance for token rewards? Yes, there is! To avoid overpaying or underpaying network participants, DePIN operators should align token rewards with the actual costs of running network nodes.
If precise cost-based rewards arenโt feasible, a general guideline is to allocate 5.5%โ11% of total token supply per year during the first 1โ2 years. This range can serve as a benchmark for token reward distributions.
My research collab w/ @KoschigRobert (@1kxnetwork ) and @dylangbane (@MessariCrypto) on token reward distribution is now live:
https://t.co/CJHGqtgMRh
Special thanks to @SCBuergel, @a_d_c_, @jerrysun_, @maartjebus, Mihai Buca, and Steven Biekens for providing feedback ๐
Whatโs the right balance for token rewards in Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks (DePINs)? Data says:
- DePIN token rewards range from 5.5%โ11% of total token supply per year during the first 1โ2 years after launch
- Over a typical 4y vesting period, DePIN rewards average ~20% of total token supply, effectively mirroring the average percentage allocated to project teams
#DePIN #tokenomics
๐งต Why do DePINs distribute token incentives to their node operators? At launch, many DePINs face the chicken-and-egg problem: low user demand arises from an inadequate supply of services.
To address this, most DePIN incentive mechanisms have incentivized the supply of services
Finding 3: DePINs mainly use gateway companies or foundations to generate revenue with plans to decentralize the demand side over time. Burn-and-Mint (BME) and Node-Purchase models have become more common over time, driven by an increase in PRN launches.
Most DePINs require "skin-in-the-game":
- Digital Resource Networks primarily use a Stake for Access token incentive model;
- Physical Resource Networks primarily use a Node-Purchase model.
Check my research w/ @KoschigRobert (@1kxnetwork) & @dylangbane (@MessariCrypto) below:
Published research has a problem: if experiments cannot be reproduced, the results cannot be truly verified. DeSci aims to solve for transparency of data sets & methodologies. Bullish DeSci ๐