When violence is categorized accurately, this unequivocally true.
You know who the bad guys are, because they’re the ones who want censorship of free speech.
Scam Altman didn’t tell the OpenAI board that he OWNED the OpenAI Startup Fund.
Altman lied in congressional testimony that he didn’t have financial gain from OpenAI.
Even former OpenAI employees didn’t want Sam Altman converting OpenAI from a nonprofit charity to a for-profit business.
“OpenAI may one day build technology that could get us all killed,” said Nisan Stiennon, an AI engineer who worked at OpenAI from 2018 to 2020. “It is to OpenAI’s credit that it’s controlled by a nonprofit with a duty to humanity. This duty precludes giving up that control.”
Elon Musk’s trial against Sam Altman begins today
Remember, an OpenAi whistleblower was murdered
Tucker Carlson revealed that OpenAI whistleblower Suchir Balaji’s mother has crime scene photos that show blood all over the apartment, she has actual photo proof of this
Photos that absolutely prove that California authorities are lying about his death being a suicide
“There are 7 evidences that were very critical, which has not been picked up by the authorities — 7 photographers”
“The first thing that jumps out, and it's very obvious from the photographs that you took, is that there's blood all over the apartment. The official explanation is your son shot himself once in the head and the bullet entered the brainstem and extinguished life immediately.”
“But these photographs show that that's not at all what happened because there's blood all over the apartment. There's blood on the door, on the floor in the bathroom, there's blood everywhere. That right there, just employing common sense, tells you that the person from whom that blood came, your son presumably did not have a fatal brain injury, at least when he was bleeding.”
@JustJake@sovrgnmind@pmarca Good convo with Grok about all of this. I cited Chesterton's Fence and Grok cited the Therac-25 incident.
While at SGI, a friend and I were sent to NZ and Oz to diagnose and fix a multiprocessor kernel race created by "YOLO, let's multithread the kernel". https://t.co/5gmlCABBLU
Elon’s influence was monumental to OpenAI.
The reality is there simply wouldn’t have been the AI world we have today.
It is not perfect. But would have been orders of magnitude worse.
This is the way of it.
🚨 OpenAI just REMOVED the AGI clause that was a structural protection of OpenAI's charitable mission, while jury selection was happening today
The 2019 capped-profit structure had three protections for the charitable mission:
1. 100x profit cap: REMOVED in PBC conversion
2. AGI clause: REMOVED today
3. Microsoft exclusivity: REMOVED today
All three are gone.
This is exactly what Musk's lawsuit alleges: the people running OpenAI systematically dismantled the mission-protection mechanisms. Today they did it again.
The defense theory just got harder.
OpenAI's defense includes: "Microsoft's $13 billion-plus investment was necessary for our mission. Without that capital, OpenAI couldn't have shipped GPT-4 or scaled ChatGPT."
But today, on the morning of trial, OpenAI announced they are decoupling from Microsoft:
• AGI clause REMOVED. The nuclear option that let the non-profit board terminate Microsoft's commercial rights once AGI was achieved. Gone.
• Microsoft IP license now NON-EXCLUSIVE through 2032. OpenAI can license to anyone.
• Cloud exclusivity ENDED. OpenAI can sell across AWS, Google Cloud, Oracle.
• Revenue share capped. Microsoft no longer pays revenue share to OpenAI; OpenAI still pays Microsoft through 2030.
If Microsoft was so necessary, why restructure on the day the case reaches a jury?
Musk's lawyers will use this in court tomorrow.
I hear so often: “the right must unite”.
The rally on 16 May is not just an opportunity for politicians to unite but also for us to meet our boss - the British people.
If we, servants of the people, wish to save our country, we must be with our people.
Unified peaceful resolute British strength. 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
All three of the liberal justices dissented from the order allowing Texas to use their new congressional map.
But these same justices all voted with a unanimous court back in February to allow California to use its new maps.
The three liberal justices are simply progressive activists wearing black robes.