I’m glad Lyndsey detailed this -
-The NYT found HER
-They got her agreement to go on the record based on the understanding that they weren’t hanging her out to dry
-They connected her with other victims with vivid stories - that didn’t even get included
-They spent more of the story explaining why she might not be credible
-They gave Platner pushback more validity than Lyndsey’s account - and continued to press her to relive and re-prove everything she had about the most toxic point in her life
-Editors seem more interested in killing a story than getting facts right or shining a light on horrific behavior from a major candidate for office
Journalists made themselves the heroes of the #MeToo movement - they even made movies about it. But the lesson from this is journalists role in exposing bad behavior is different if the accuser is an (R) and the powerful person being accused is a (D).
I'd genuinely like to hear someone explain why Elon Musk doing an autistic wave at inauguration was proof that he is a Nazi who needs to be exiled from public life, but Graham Platner's "Totenkopf" tat is NBD and not disqualifying for a Senate run.