Hunter

mouths, but cannot speak,
eyes, but cannot see.
ears, but cannot hear,
noses, but cannot smell.

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

Confluence > Influence

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

@breakoutprop what do you mean everywhere else

[Algod @AlgodTrading]

We have AI that is 1000 times better than us at pattern recognition aka Technical Analysis and we still have people who pretend TA works

How can anyone with just a little bit of logic in their brain still believe in this?

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

@theunipcs @cz_binance @GiggleAcademy Oh no. You poor thing. Such an issue.

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

@blknoiz06 Imagine not being able to say anything about RH chain lmao

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

Two giants! @Lighter_xyz listing $cashcat.

What a massive event. This will leave ripple effects for years to come.

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

@Bandit0x0 what if 100 people bought 1% supply?

[Nest @NestUSD]

Three weeks in!

Season 1 has 218 wallets earning 100,000 points per day pro-rata, 2.1M points distributed to date

Nest now has $1.25M TVL across three sources ($572K PSM + Kamino reserves, $352K tokenized equity collateral, $327K Meteora nUSD LP positions, with $737K nUSD in circulation, backed at 125%, and snUSD is paying 6% APY from real protocol revenue

40,600 $NEST burned via daily buyback

Verifiable at https://t.co/L4DgP8nG1s

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

@nodes explain like I'm five, whats the compute used for?

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

fullported for the culture $Cabinet

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

$1 and a dream coin launches, goes to 80k then dumps to 6k.

@a1lon9 TWEETS about it, confirming the narrative

guess what happens next:

1) the guys who held the coin get rewarded for their conviction

2) new coin under the same ticker launches and everyone's attention switches to it, the old coin slowly bleeds to zero

qPorq2UQuP6g1KZnGKMQEfVxN87BYvaYdqVy3KVpump

DZMYSwA1qTAGzJWij6TS2zCU8KbWtRCHuReL52aFpump

You used to get rewarded for things like this. Now you're punished.

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

$1 and a dream coin launches, goes to 80k then dumps to 6k.

@a1lon9 TWEETS about it, confirming the narrative

guess what happens next:

1) the guys who held the coin get rewarded for their conviction

2) new coin under the same ticker launches and everyone's attention switches to it, the old coin slowly bleeds to zero

qPorq2UQuP6g1KZnGKMQEfVxN87BYvaYdqVy3KVpump

You used to get rewarded for things like this. Now you're punished.

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

2kBH6UcR8TitebUbKNYNvjUkSFWaiFBJ7nAPTKQwpump
$ชั้ง

return to tradition

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

@elonmusk @XFreeze We call it Interlink

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

@level941

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

$SPX6900

forgotten, but only by the narrowminded

LONG LONG LONG

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

@aminulive @BinanceUS its "supposed" to

[Hunter @teh_hunt]

@yungcontent rl sims

[H.E. Justin Sun 👨‍🚀 🌞 @justinsuntron]

This Is World Tyranny, Not World Liberty Financial — Here's Why

This proposal has been packaged as a "governance alignment signal" and a "long-term commitment," but strip away the packaging and what you have is one of the most absurd governance scams I have ever seen. Let me break it down.

I. Vote Against and Get Punished — Classic Coercion Tactic

This is not a legitimate voting exercise, not even close.  The design of this proposal is a logical trap: anyone who votes against it has their tokens locked indefinitely with no unlock path whatsoever.

In other words, if you oppose this proposal, you get punished. This is not voting. This is coercion. What kind of democratic process rewards agreement and imprisons dissent?

II. Voters Have Been Selectively Frozen Out

I personally hold approximately 4% of the voting power, yet my tokens have been frozen and I am forced out of this voting process.

I am not alone.

A large number of holders with significant voting rights are in the same position. Meanwhile, the team controls the power to freeze tokens — they decide who can vote and who cannot. What does this mean? It means the outcome was determined before the vote even began.

This is not a governance vote. This is a performance where the police have already barricaded the doors of parliament and only let their own people inside to raise their hands. The voter pool has been purged. Only yes votes remain.

The result of such a vote carries no binding force whatsoever.

III. All Actual Power Has Been Seized by Anonymous Actors

The actual control over the WLFI smart contracts lies in the hands of a 3/5 anonymous multisig and a single anonymous guardian EOA has the power to blacklist addresses holding WLFI.

Let me emphasize — anonymous.

This anonymous multisig can override any vote result and execute any operation directly at the contract level. The so-called governance proposals, on-chain votes, and community discussions are nothing but theater. Real power has never been yielded to anyone but themselves and it’s laughable that they try these tricks to fool the community.

The bottom line is this, the power sits with anonymous wallet addresses whose owners nobody knows or can verify. This is not decentralized governance. This is dictatorship wearing the mask of a DAO.

IV. Voters Must Identify Themselves, but the Rulers Are Anonymous — Worse Than Tyranny

Here is the most ironic part: WLFI requires every participating voter to complete identity verification, electronically sign acknowledgements, and meet compliance eligibility requirements. You want to exercise your rights? Show your face first.

But who are the guardian and multisig signers who hold the power of life and death over the contract? Nobody was told and there is absolutely no transparency.  While the governed must identify themselves, the governors with absolute power are anonymous. Your voters must register, submit to scrutiny, and be vetted and dictated how to vote— while your dictators won't even show their faces.

V. A Naked Violation of Property Rights Worth Billions of Dollars

Let us not forget the real stakes of this proposal: this is not some trivial parameter adjustment or protocol upgrade. This vote seeks to decide the unlock schedule for billions of dollars in assets, the reallocation of governance and vesting rights, and most extreme of all, the permanent destruction of billions of tokens. This is a naked expropriation of holders' property rights.

In an environment where voting against the proposal is punished, where large numbers of holders have been frozen out of voting, and where actual control rests with anonymous wallets, using this sham vote to decide the fate of billions of dollars in assets?

This is not governance. This is a sham and flies in the face of what this protocol was meant to be. No society governed by the rule of law would permit this. In traditional financial markets, any asset disposition of this scale would require rigorous regulatory review, independent board approval, and minority shareholder protections.

Here, a few anonymous wallets get to decide everything. The permanent burning of tokens means holders' property is irreversibly destroyed, no compensation, no recourse, no due process. This has gone far beyond the realm of so-called "decentralized governance." This is a systematic violation of property rights.

Conclusion

I repeat that this proposal is not governance. It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation.

Dissenters are punished for voting no. Opponents are frozen out. Actual control lies with anonymous wallets. Those who exercise their rights must prove their identity while the fate of billions of dollars in assets is decided by a sham vote.

This is not what decentralized finance was meant to be, results produced under these sorts of conditions carry no legitimacy, should not have binding force, and should not be recognized.

I call on all WLFI holders to see this proposal for what it truly is, to voice their opposition across all public channels, and to reserve all legal rights of recourse.