telecomstar

[telecomstar @telecomstar]

@MrBeast 250,000,000

[telecomstar @telecomstar]

@ENWINUtilities Power back up in university area!!! Yeah, ENWIN!!! 👏🏽👏🏽

[Nick shirley @nickshirleyy]

🚨 Today the California Senate Committee held a hearing on the “Stop Nick Shirley Act,” known as AB 2624. This bill will criminalize and punish anyone from looking into fraud inside immigrant communities in California.

This bill was created only after I exposed billions of dollars in fraud throughout immigrant communities in the US. “Immigration support services” have become a billion dollar industry in California, and now that the fraud has been exposed, they are trying to criminalize those who look into the fraud.

The bill has passed through the California Assembly and is set to pass through the Senate and then to Governor Newsom’s desk. This bill was created by the Attorney Generals WIFE and will allow him to go after citizens if they film nonprofits and “immigration support services providers”.

Welcome to Califraudia.

[telecomstar @telecomstar]

@TerryHethering9 Hell yes!!

[telecomstar @telecomstar]

@GadSaad No!

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

PLEASE.

Do me a favour.

Listen to this song.

It’s honestly amazing.

[Pierre Poilievre @PierrePoilievre]

Happy one-year anniversary!

A year ago today, Parliament rushed through unprecedented powers for the Carney Liberals to go around every law and regulation to fast-track big projects and build “at speeds not seen in generations”.

How many projects have been approved using those powers?

Zero.

How many are waiting for federal approval?

500.

It is all an illusion.

[Rebel News @RebelNewsOnline]

Ezra Levant: Thanks to floor crossers, Carney can now ram through his spy bill

Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill.

The answer? It is a direct assault on parliamentary democracy and your freedoms.

Last year, Mark Carney won the election with just 43 percent of the vote. That delivered him 169 seats out of 343 in the House of Commons, three short of the 172 needed for a majority. Canadians deliberately gave him a minority government. Sometimes voters do that on purpose, wanting to keep a politician on a shorter leash and force him to work with Parliament rather than dominate it.

But Carney was not content with the verdict of the electorate. While the political establishment spent years warning that Donald Trump might refuse to accept election results, Carney set about changing his own. By persuading a string of opposition MPs to cross the floor, he secured the majority Canadians had declined to give him at the ballot box.

The obvious question is why? Justin Trudeau governed for nearly a decade without a formal majority, relying on NDP support to pass budgets and survive confidence votes. There was little reason to believe Carney could not have done the same.

Ezra’s answer is that Carney wanted something more than legislative support. He wanted the ability to shut down parliamentary scrutiny itself.

That is now on full display.

Using his newly acquired majority, Carney’s government has moved to dramatically curtail debate on Bill C-22, the so-called lawful access bill. The legislation would compel technology companies to retain user data for up to a year and make that information available to government authorities. Civil liberties advocates have raised serious concerns about privacy, government overreach and the expansion of state surveillance powers.

The concerns are hardly theoretical. Canadians have already witnessed a government willing to freeze bank accounts and invoke extraordinary powers during the trucker protests. Mark Carney himself, while living in Europe at the time, wrote in The Globe and Mail that Ottawa should take a harder line against convoy participants and their supporters. It is therefore not surprising that critics view Bill C-22 as part of a broader push toward greater state control.

What makes the situation particularly troubling is not only the substance of the legislation but the manner in which it is being advanced.

The government has introduced a motion declaring that, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-22 will be pushed through Parliament on an accelerated timetable. In plain English, the normal rules are being set aside.

Committee members will have just 30 minutes to complete clause-by-clause consideration of the bill. Any remaining amendments will be deemed moved and voted upon without further debate. The legislation will then move rapidly through report stage and third reading with strictly limited speaking time for opposition parties and virtually no opportunity for extended scrutiny.

For a bill that constitutes one of the most significant expansions of government surveillance powers in Canadian history, Parliament is being afforded remarkably little time to examine the details.

Professor Michael Geist, one of Canada’s leading experts on technology law and digital policy, has publicly criticized the government’s approach. Geist argues that hearings are being cut short, amendments are being rushed through without proper discussion, and the public is being denied the transparency normally expected during the legislative process. His warning is not about partisan politics but about the erosion of parliamentary accountability.

This is why Carney needed those extra seats.

The issue is not merely that opposition MPs crossed the floor. It is what those additional seats are now being used to accomplish. This is a double violation of democratic principles: first, altering the balance of Parliament after voters had already spoken; and second, using that altered balance to restrict Parliament’s ability to debate, amend and scrutinize legislation.

The implications extend beyond a single bill. Across Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Australia, governments are increasingly embracing online surveillance measures, age-verification requirements and expanded regulatory control over digital spaces. These initiatives are almost always presented as necessary protections for children or public safety, yet they also require citizens to surrender more privacy and give governments more information about their online activities.

It is a stark contrast to the vision of technological progress championed by figures such as Elon Musk, who promote innovation, space exploration, artificial intelligence and the expansion of human potential. One approach sees technology as a tool of freedom and advancement. The other increasingly treats it as something to be monitored, regulated and controlled.

This is what an unchecked majority can look like under Mark Carney: Parliament reduced to a rubber stamp, debate curtailed, privacy placed at risk and major legislation rushed through with minimal scrutiny.

Canadians deserve better.

The democratic process only matters if it is respected when it becomes inconvenient. If Parliament is no longer permitted to properly examine legislation, question witnesses or challenge the government of the day, then the institution itself is diminished. That should concern every Canadian regardless of political affiliation.

[telecomstar @telecomstar]

@salruffolo @PierrePoilievre Perhaps if the main stream media did their job and reported this, the conversation would be different.

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

🚨 BREAKING: Edward Snowden risked his life to expose the US government secretly using tech companies to spy on Americans.

Bill C-22 just passed in Canada and it does the exact same thing except this time it isn’t secret.

The Carney government is doing in PUBLIC, what the Obama administration tried to do in private.

The Liberals can now order Google, Apple, Bell, Rogers, Meta, X, Signal, anyone, to hand over your data in SECRET.

They are legally banned from telling you.

No warrant.

No judge.

No notice.

They didn’t even bother to hide it.

[Andrew Scheer @AndrewScheer]

Mark Carney has missed over 100 Question Periods!

As bad as he was, even Justin Trudeau would show up.

We’re in a recession. Canadians are going hungry. They’re losing their jobs.

The very least Mark Carney can do is show up and do his job.

[Steven Bonk @StevenBonkMP]

Today, Mark Carney missed his 100th Question Period!

Congratulations!

No other Canadian Prime Minister has had such a dismal record.

Mr. Carney, show up and do your job.

It's what Canadians are paying you for.

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

Shoutout to the government's biggest threat who's been fighting for us the whole time.

Thank you Pierre for:

✅ Killing the Netflix/streaming tax

✅ Killing the consumer carbon tax

✅ Killing the capital gains tax increase

✅ Killing the Digital Services Tax

✅ Obliterating the careers of Jagmeet Singh & Trudeau 

✅ Forcing the ArriveCAN scam audit 

✅ Forcing a reduction of fuel taxes at the pump

✅ Forcing a tax cut on lower income families

He's not in government.

He does not hold power.

Yet he's accomplished so much for us.

Now Imagine what he could do as Prime Minister...

[Milton Friedman Quotes @MiltonFriedmanW]

Milton Friedman on 4 ways to spend money:

1) Your money on yourself (you’re careful about both cost and quality)
2) Your money on others (you care about cost, less about quality)
3) Someone else’s money on yourself (you care about quality, not cost)
4) Someone else’s money on others (you care about neither)

The last one is how government spending works.

[SandraCobena @SandraCobena_]

🚨The Liberals are playing a dangerous game with our country’s finances.

By redefining basic accounting terms, they’ve quietly relabeled nearly $94 billion in operating expenses as “investments”, even things like FIFA security. That’s not investment. That’s political spin.

You can’t call your grocery bill a mortgage and expect people not to notice.

Conservatives will restore honest budgeting: clear definitions, transparent accounting, and a return to responsible spending that actually invests in productivity, infrastructure, and long-term economic growth.

#cdnpoli

[Roman Baber @Roman_Baber]

I'd love to have high speed train!

Problem is $90 billion dollars for Alto will turn into half a trillion.

The train will NEVER be built. But lots of Liberals will become rich at your expense. Just like with this stupid launch pad.