Tempo x

[Rising Gems @RisingGemsz]

Selling Harry Amass for £6m would be absolute criminal asset management.

That is an insane undervaluation.

The base transfer fee should be at least £15m–£20m.

[FergiesRightRef @FergiesRightRef]

I swear I don't get the hate the guy gets.

He could very well chill and rack up numbers by rimming INEOS with his 2m subs.

Yet, he keeps fighting against them while others keep rimming INEOS for a little pre season snippet or pieces of info. (Howson, Flex, Muppetiers)

[Kyle Quinn @GloryGloryPod]

🔴 United are not going to win the @premierleague by behaving like Daniel Levy in the transfer market. Eventually you have to pay the transfer fee and salary for a player who is worth it. For example, Aurélien Tchouaméni #mufc 🇫🇷

[Shubz @MulaShubz]

Manchester United want players to be DESPERATE to join us when the fucking reality is we’re DESPERATE for players to join us.

[Devil In The Details @DevildetailsMU]

Let’s not kid ourselves here Manchester United fans were in trouble with Ineos! Lost a Europa League final to Spurs and now they’ve beaten us to a top talent in Matues Fernandes. We’re not signing Tchouameni either don’t get your hopes up! At least we’ve won the not overpaying participation trophy though 😂

[UtdTruthful @Utdtruthful]

🚨 INEOS two TOP midfield targets this summer:

• Elliot Anderson
• Mateus Fernandes

MISSED 💣

[FPL Frasier @FPLfrasier]

Bruno Fernandes recommended Joao Neves to us. We failed him.

Bruno Fernandes recommended Mateus to us. We failed him. Again.

[Suhail Chowdhary @SuhailChowdhary]

Manchester United's INEOS Football Operations are an embarrassment and they're setting Michael Carrick up to fail.

[Mark Goldbridge @markgoldbridge]

So United brief for 9 months Anderson is the priority and when the window opens decide he's not worth bidding for lol

[Glazers out @Glazerspissoff]

We want a new face to win the league @FA_PGMOL @premierleague

[Tempo x @Tempox16]

@Syndicate 😂😂

[Tempo x @Tempox16]

@Syndicate this has to be the new electric gates to the 110!!

[Tempo x @Tempox16]

@FPL_TomHadley As if they found 5 for van dijk but couldn’t find 1 for Oreilly 😭

[Stretford Post @StretfordPost]

Eric Cantona didn’t hold back. He called out the Glazers and INEOS for “ripping the heart out of the club.”

United needs more voices with Cantona’s courage. More backbone. More truth.

Via (@manufcnow)

#GlazersOut #UnitedIsBroken

[𝗔𝗺𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗵𝗼 @Amad16FC]

Sheikh please put £6bn on the table

We need you to save us from GLINEOS.

#UnitedIsBroken

[Stretford Post @StretfordPost]

Letter To @AndyBurnhamGM Mayor Of Manchester.

Dear Mayor Burnham,

I am writing to you not only as a football supporter, but as someone who believes deeply in Manchester’s identity, heritage, and future.

I urge you in the strongest possible terms to reject the regeneration application put forward by Sir Jim Ratcliffe and the Glazer family. This proposal is not about the people of Manchester, nor about football, nor about genuine regeneration. It is about power, vanity, and profit at the expense of a historic institution that helped put this city on the global map.

For nearly 20 years, Manchester United has been systematically hollowed out by the Glazer family. Since their leveraged takeover in 2005, the club has been burdened with over £1 billion in debt, interest payments, fees, and dividends. While rival clubs invested in stadiums, training facilities, local jobs, and community infrastructure, Old Trafford was allowed to decay its roof leaking, facilities falling behind, and safety repeatedly questioned. This neglect was not accidental; it was the predictable outcome of an ownership model designed to extract wealth rather than build value.

During this period, the Glazers paid themselves hundreds of millions of pounds in dividends while the club’s competitiveness, reputation, and relationship with supporters steadily eroded. This is not regeneration. This is extraction.

Sir Jim Ratcliffe and INEOS now present themselves as saviours, yet their actions raise serious concerns. This project increasingly appears to be a vanity-led redevelopment, using Manchester United’s cultural and emotional capital to secure planning permissions, public goodwill, and long-term commercial upside without clear guarantees that the club, its supporters, or the local community will truly benefit.

Manchester United is not a property asset.
It is not a branding exercise.
It is not a financial instrument.

It is a civic institution, woven into the social, cultural, and economic fabric of this city. The club’s name is synonymous with Manchester across every continent. To allow those who have demonstrably damaged it to now reshape large parts of our city in their own image would be a profound failure of stewardship.

You have long spoken about protecting Manchester from decisions imposed by distant elites who do not live with the consequences of their actions. This is one of those moments. Approving this project would reward two decades of mismanagement and signal that global financiers can exploit our greatest institutions, then return asking for civic approval when it suits them.

Regeneration must be done with the people of Manchester, not to them.
It must be rooted in transparency, accountability, and community ownershipnot debt, leverage, and legacy-polishing.

Manchester deserves better.
Manchester United deserves better.

I ask you to stand with supporters, residents, and future generations by rejecting this application and demanding a vision for regeneration that genuinely serves the city and protects its soul.

Yours sincerely,
A concerned Manchester United supporter

[mufcmpb @mufcMPB]

🚨🚨🎥 @SkyKaveh:

“Michael Carrick, fantastic player… it doesn’t matter who’s in charge.

“The problems at Manchester United are to do with the OWNERSHIP model [The Glazers & INEOS]. Unless that changes, NOTHING is going to change.”

#MUFC [Sky]

[Glazers out @Glazerspissoff]

We want #GlazersAndRatcliffeOut
#GlazersOut #IneosOutNOW @INEOS

[UtdActive @UtdActive]

Nobody wants Jason Wilcox at the club @INEOS so listen to your fans.