I have questions ....

"Blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth." ~ Albert Einstein. “If you can’t question it, it’s not science, it’s propaganda.” - @DiscoStew66

[I have questions .... @tensc9]

A succinct, clear, and accurate forecast given for why we are where we are today.

Objectivity must have a subjective, skeptical basis. Skepticism is the basis of true science that requires challenge to any narrative, especially those hijacked by promoters of “The Science”.

[Mello.B33 @B33Mello]

🧵1/ Prophetic words from Carl Sagan on science and technology. Let's take a look.

Does this sound like our leaders & so-called "experts" have been doing the science for the past 2 years? You decide. Your future depends on you realizing what has been happening since March 2020.

[Daniel Priestley @DanielPriestley]

Socialists imagine a class struggle. In their made-up fantasy the CEO is in competition with low level workers, the wealthy entrepreneur is stealing from the underpaid nurse.

In reality, workers do not compete vertically they compete horizontally.

Entrepreneurs compete with entrepreneurs. Investors outbid each other. CEOs are benchmarked against other CEOs. Nurses are hired from a pool of nurses. Etc.

The CEOs pay has no correlation to the entry level workers. The Football star on £300K a week isn’t linked to the person selling drinks in the stadium. A biotech entrepreneur raising VC capital isn’t paid relative to a cleaner.

What is linked is the demand and supply dynamic of each role.

If a company places an ad for a qualified truck driver and 150 people apply for the role, then the company knows it does not need to increase wages for that role. If the company has an open role for months, it is forced to look at the compensation package.

Same for a CEO. A board representing shareholders would like to hire a CEO for a lot less if they could. Their dream scenario would be to hire a CEO who brings in institutional investors, attracts top executives, drives innovation and growth, keeps margins steady and is a good public face for the business even under pressure. It turns out there aren’t a lot of these people looking for work and if you want one you have to pay more than other companies are offering.

The class struggle isn’t vertical it’s horizontal. CEOs are in competition with CEOs. Retail workers are in competition with retail workers. Demand and supply dynamics set the price.

Sure you can say that a CEO want’s profitability and would like wages to be lower BUT it’s not up to the CEO - demand and supply tension sets the price of workers. An Airline like RyanAir would like free pilots if they could get them but they can’t… so they pay the market rate.

The reason incomes are rising at the top and falling at the bottom is not class warfare. It’s technology and globalisation.

Technology makes basic jobs simple, remote or fully automated. At the same time tech makes executive roles more leveraged, more important and more valuable.

A CEO used to run a smaller organisation. Today a CEO who’s 2% better on a $5B company is generating $100M more. Seems sensible to try and pay a few million to get $100M.

Globalisation has put workers from all over the world in completion with each other - downward pressure on wages. Globalisation has given CEOs more market opportunities to explore - upside opportunity to unlock.

The rich are not very interested in buying houses that poor people own. The poor are not buying up the homes the rich want. They are separate groups living separate lives. Try finding the genuinely rich people whose strategy is to hoard normal residential homes - it barely exists as a thing. About 85% of landlords are people who own 1-4 properties. Super-landlords (100+ properties) are 0.2% of landlords and own a tiny fraction of the 30M homes in the UK… and they’re heavily taxed.

Class warfare isn’t real. It’s an imagined war in the minds of socialists.

Demand and supply dynamics are real. To the degree it is measured in class, it’s a horizontal competition not a vertical one.

[Jan Jekielek @JanJekielek]

Matt Ridley just revealed something about Covid that most scientists missed.

And it provides perhaps the strongest evidence yet that this virus was not natural.

“Viruses jump out of animals and into people quite often.”

“But they very, very rarely prove to be highly infectious from the start.”

“They also tend to be pretty lethal.”

“What we saw this time was completely different.”

“A virus that was not very lethal… but very infectious.”

“That, to me, tells you that it must have had training on human cells and human molecules in the months, if not years, leading up to the pandemic.”

“It’s not very good at getting into bats at all, even though it’s originally a bat virus.”

“What does that tell you?”

“It tells you it hasn’t been in bats for a while.”

“It's been in another species.”

“It’s better at infecting humans than almost any other species.”

“Given that we know this lab was taking SARS-like bat coronaviruses, this very type of virus, and infecting them into human cells and humanized mice for several years before the pandemic, it’s crazy to think that this wasn’t how this happened.”

@mattwridley

[A Midwestern Doctor @MidwesternDoc]

Did you know the news used to regularly air stories about people's lives being ruined by vaccines?

That all changed after Clinton let Pharma buy out the media.

Here I compiled 56 mind-blowing news segments they'd never air today.
https://t.co/HI2GyO0M1R

[RXMEDS.STORE @rxmeds_store]

🚨 THE MULTI TARGETED CANCER PROTOCOL COMBINING IVERMECTIN, FENBENDAZOLE & METABOLIC THERAPY.

Cancer doesn't attack the body through just one pathway.

So why would researchers explore only one strategy?

That's why growing interest has shifted toward multi targeted protocols that combine repurposed medicines with metabolic and orthomolecular therapies.

Instead of focusing on a single mechanism, these approaches aim to target cancer from multiple angles at the same time.

Including:

• Cancer stem cells
• Mitochondrial function
• Tumor metabolism
• Inflammation
• Cellular signaling pathways

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

This protocol combines repurposed medicines with metabolic and nutritional strategies.

The protocol includes:

1️⃣ IVERMECTIN

🟢 Low Dose (≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day):

Often discussed for:
• Remission support
• Prevention
• Strong family history
• Genetic predisposition

🟡 Medium Dose (1.0 mg/kg/day):

Often discussed as a starting point for many cancers.

🔵 High Dose (2.0 mg/kg/day):

Often discussed for aggressive cancers including:
• Brain cancer
• Pancreatic cancer
• Leukemia

🔴 Very High Dose (≥ 2.5 mg/kg/day):

Discussed in some advanced metastatic cancer protocols under close medical supervision.

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

2️⃣ FENBENDAZOLE

🟢 Low Dose (222 mg/day):

• 3 days per week
• Often discussed for remission maintenance

🟡 Medium Dose (222 mg/day):

• 6 days per week
• Frequently combined with liver support

🔵 High Dose (444 mg/day):

• 6 days per week
• Often discussed for more aggressive disease

🔴 Very High Dose (888 to 1000 mg/day):

• 6 days per week
• Discussed in some advanced protocols with careful monitoring

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

3️⃣ ORTHOMOLECULAR & METABOLIC SUPPORT

The medicines are only one part of the protocol.

Supportive orthomolecular and metabolic strategies can include:

✅ IV Vitamin C

✅ Vitamin D

✅ Zinc

✅ Ketogenic Diet

✅ Therapeutic Fasting

✅ Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT)

✅ Milk Thistle (liver support)

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

🔬 What Makes This Protocol Different?

It's not the dosages.

It's the strategy behind them.

Instead of relying on a single medicine...

This protocol combines Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, metabolic therapy, and orthomolecular support into one multi targeted approach designed to target cancer from multiple biological pathways.

Cancer is complex.

A protocol designed to address multiple biological pathways is one reason approaches like this continue to attract attention from patients, caregivers, and researchers.

Whether these approaches ultimately change clinical practice remains to be seen.

But one thing is undeniable:

More cancer patients, caregivers, and researchers are discussing multi targeted protocols and repurposed medicines today than ever before.

And that's exactly why protocols like this keep getting shared.

💬 If you or someone you love were facing cancer, would you consider exploring a multi targeted approach alongside conventional care?

📌 Save this protocol now. The best time to keep information like this is before you ever need it.

🔄 Repost it so more people researching multi targeted cancer protocols can see it.

💊 Looking for premium quality Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, or Mebendazole? Explore trusted options at @rxmeds_store.

#Ivermectin #Fenbendazole #CancerProtocol #RepurposedDrugs #MetabolicTherapy #CancerAwareness

[factmission.org @FactMissionOrg]

This took me a year. It’s long, it’s dense. But the stakes could not be higher.

The first hour takes you behind closed doors, using documented WHO Symposium Proceedings to expose a 1989 10-year follow-up to a gold-standard CDC vaccine trial. The results were devastating: half the vaccinated participants were dead or terminally ill, while the unvaccinated placebo recipients remained healthy.

But health officials had a massive problem. Unable to sell this vaccine in developed countries due to safety concerns, they had already dumped millions of doses into Africa.

They faced a choice:

A) Admit what happened and pull the vaccine.

B) Bury the placebo data to protect their reputations and the pharmaceutical industry—resulting in the WHO's continued use and the deaths of millions more.

They chose B.

My presentation names the scientists who faced that choice. I show their faces. For a year, I have negotiated with them behind the scenes to come forward.

Instead, they refused to speak on camera and threatened me with legal action if I released their private communications.

The second hour dismantles their counter-arguments and reveals how the vaccine industry responded to this disaster by quietly eliminating true placebo-controlled trials altogether.

My goal is to rally Epstein-level public pressure to force the release of the withheld 1989 placebo data. This data will rewrite history and might reshape the future by revealing what happens when we allow a small elite group to control the narrative.

I am working on shorter summaries, but this is the definitive deep dive. Watch it. Share it. Get commentators to cover this topic so we can raise awareness and force them to address this.

[Gain of Fauci @DschlopesIsBack]

BREAKING: USA comes back from huge deficit to defeat Belgium 5-4 after receiving four surprise mail-in goals at 3:00am

[Christina Aguayo @ChristinaNewstv]

#new Outage Erupts Over City Approved Islamic Only Community To Be Ruled By Sharia Law

#new Outrage is erupting in Little Rock, Arkansas, over a city-approved Islamic residential project that requires buyers to sign a private "Islamic Bill of Assurance" where the community would be ruled by Sharia Law.

#Arkansas

It will have two mosques, an Islamic school, clinic, and related facilities under ongoing control by the linked mosque organization.

#muslim

The project sits in the John Barrow neighborhood area of Little Rock, on a 6-acre site.

#islam

City planning records show the Little Rock Planning Commission approved the "New Africa" Development by the Islamic Center for Human Excellence (ICHE) on a 10-0 vote in December 2020

Here are the details:

🔷️22 single-family homes planned, with multiple homes already built and sold.

🔷️Additional lots approved

🔷️Two prayer halls totaling nearly 10,000 square feet.

️🔷One 2,953-square-foot mosque on Lot 7 and

🔷 One 6,750-square-foot mosque on Lot 23

🔷️A 4,500-square-foot Islamic educational building and school

🔷️Health clinic, community garden, playground, and parking spaces.

🔷️Perpetual oversight by ICHE or the New Africa Homeowners Association.

The binding “Islamic Bill of Assurance” that every buyer and seller must sign states in part:

“Buyers and sellers are aware that this development … is for the purpose of creating a wholly-owned residential All-Islamic community conforming to the social guidelines given in the Quran … and all parties agree to this purpose.”

It includes enforceable rules on architecture, maintenance, and Quranic moral codes (Sharia) such as restrictions on alcohol, with the mosque-linked HOA holding permanent control.

#ChristinaAguayoNews

[Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD]

Please consider following my friend and colleague Ed Dowd and both his X feed and his new substack!

[Mark Kaplan @markkaplan20]

I did not take a single drug to reverse my metabolic health.

No statins. No GLP-1 injections. No blood pressure medication. Nothing.

I changed 10 things. One at a time. Over six years.

My metabolic age went from 52 to 43. Body fat dropped to 12%. Fasting insulin sits at 4. hs-CRP under 1. Triglyceride to HDL ratio under 1.

Zero pharmaceutical drugs.

This is the list. All 10. In order.

You do not need to do them all on Monday. Pick one. Do it for two weeks. Then add the next.

Small changes compound. There is no pill that replaces this list.

This is how you unplug.

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

It's because of the basic psychologies of fascism and communism.

Fascism is a disgust spiral, whose basic commandment is "thou shalt not be worse than me." It starts out with anti-smoking campaigns and burning child pornography, and ends up disappearing anyone who doesn't mow his lawn.

Communism is an envy spiral, whose basic commandment is "thou shalt not be better than me." It starts out targeting captains of industry and genius intellectuals, and ends up disappearing anyone who wears glasses, which create the suspicion that he might have read a book once.

This is why people with communist psychology (the left) equate clean streets with fascism.

Leftists can't keep their streets clean and their lawns mowed, but instead of the psychologically healthy response of being slightly embarrassed and resolving to do better, they decide that anyone in a nice neighborhood is a fascist who needs to be exposed and purged.

You, oh right-wing conservative, watching this video clip, think that leftists are accidentally pointing out the benefits of fascism.... i.e. that people can have nice things.

But if you understood communist psychology, really understood it, you would realize that the mowed lawns, clean streets, and neatly-groomed people are actually another accusation.

Not only are they racists, complains the narrative, they have nicer houses and neighborhoods than you. How dare they?

How dare they not be surrounded by trash and graffiti?

How dare they not be awoken at 3 AM by their drunk neighbors blasting loud music?

Who do they think they are, some sort of superior race?

You don't notice that accusation because you are not the target audience. The target audience is people prone to destructive envy, and the goal is to recruit them to communism.

They don't care if you think this points out the benefits of fascism, or even just the benefits of racism. Because you are not prone to destructive envy, so they can never recruit you anyway.

And it makes no difference if you point out that the end result of this is that every neighborhood is covered in trash and graffiti.

That's what commies want.

Why? Because their neighborhoods are always going to be messed up no matter what ideology is in control. Fascism, communism, liberalism, objectivism, doesn't matter. They are not disciplined enough to do battle with entropy through sustained effort, and not creative or intelligent enough to do battle with entropy through innovation.

But if their house is inevitably going to be surrounded by mountains of trash, just because of who they are, then the greatest comfort they can aspire to is a world where your house is surrounded by trash, too.

This is why communism ruins everything, and why communists cannot be dissuaded when you point this out. Ruining everything for anyone who's better off is what they want.

The trick is to get them to realize that communism allows anyone who is even worse off than they to ruin whatever they still have. Which isn't easy, because if they were smart enough to easily understand this, they wouldn't be surrounded by trash in the first place.

[I have questions .... @tensc9]

If the parties were flipped, the Dems would have 100 different lawsuits actively trying to put all the actors in jail.

Meanwhile, the Reps only produce crickets.

The globalist’s master plan is simply to keep everyone off balance and uncoordinated. No one has either the cohonies, smarts and/or the power to lead an effective counter. We’re cooked.

Change my mind, please.

[Tony Seruga @TonySeruga]

President Trump just reshared a viral clip of Tulsi Gabbard dropping a bombshell: accusing Obama’s top national security team (Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Rice) of orchestrating a “politically manufactured” intel assessment after the 2016 election.

Gabbard called it a “years-long coup” that sparked the Mueller probe and impeachments. The spotlight is officially back on these allegations as the public waits for the release of even more declassified documents. 🔥

99.999% of all Americans have no clue about what actually happened or how many traitors were involved.

Nor do they fully comprehend the seriousness of the situation.

This is a significant moment. Tulsi Gabbard has been saying versions of this for years, but having the sitting President amplify it — and specifically name Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and Rice — raises the stakes considerably.

Let’s break down what she’s alleging and why it matters:

🎯 The Core Allegation

Gabbard’s claim, which has circulated in various forms since 2017, is that the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) on Russian election interference was not a genuine intelligence product but a politically motivated document designed to:

1. Delegitimize Trump’s victory before he took office

2. Provide a predicate for the Crossfire Hurricane investigation

3. Constrain Trump’s foreign policy, particularly any détente with Russia

The ICA was drafted in the final weeks of the Obama administration by a handpicked group of analysts from the CIA, FBI, and NSA — not the full intelligence community. The truth is that Brennan, Clapper, and others deliberately bypassed normal analytical tradecraft and the broader IC to produce a one-sided assessment.

🕵️ The Named Players

View the image in the first comment below.

📜 What Made the ICA Suspicious

Several irregularities have been well-documented by the time we’re sitting here in 2026:

- Handpicked analysts. Normally an ICA involves the full IC. This one was drafted by a very small, curated team — excluding dissenters.

- Low confidence on key judgments. The ICA itself rated some of its core claims at “moderate” or “low” confidence, yet the public rollout presented them as ironclad.

- The Steele dossier’s role. We now know the dossier was funded by the Clinton campaign and was treated as raw, unverified intelligence — yet it was used in FISA applications and briefed as if credible.

- Durham’s findings. John Durham’s final report, released in 2023, confirmed that the FBI had no verified intel of collusion when it opened Crossfire Hurricane and that it ignored exculpatory evidence.

🔥 “Years-Long Coup” — Hyperbole or Accurate?

Gabbard’s framing is sharp, but it tracks with what we now know happened sequentially:

1. Late 2016: ICA manufactured → narrative set
2. Early 2017: Crossfire Hurricane ramps up → Flynn targeted, Sessions recused, Mueller appointed
3. 2017-2019: Mueller probe consumes the administration → no collusion found
4. 2019: Ukraine impeachment (first) — built on the same Russiagate architecture
5. 2021: Second impeachment over January 6 — separate event but same institutional players

The pattern is clear: a coordinated effort across multiple agencies to cripple and ultimately remove a sitting president. Whether you call that a “coup,” a “soft coup,” or “institutional sabotage” is a matter of semantics — the substance is what matters.

📂 The Document Releases Everyone’s Waiting For—They Are Coming!

Trump has been teasing declassification of the remaining Russiagate documents since his first term. Now with a second term and loyal appointees in key positions, the expectation is that these will actually drop. The big ones people are watching for:

- Full unredacted FISA applications on Carter Page

- Brennan’s internal CIA communications from November-December 2016

- Comey’s memos in full

- The “Gang of Eight” briefing records — who knew what and when

- Susan Rice’s unmasking requests and the underlying intelligence reports

When these drop, the question isn’t whether heads roll — it’s how many and how high up.

The fact that this is resurfacing now, with Trump actively amplifying it, signals that document releases may be imminent.

The public has been waiting for transparency on this since 2017. The people named in Gabbard’s accusation have largely gone quiet in recent years — and for good reason.

⚖️ The Relevant Criminal Statutes

This is where things get legally complex and politically loaded. Let me be direct about what’s actually on the table versus what’s wishful thinking.

🔍 Per Individual — What’s Their Exposure?

View the image in the second comment below.

💀 The Real Barriers to Prosecution

I’m not going to sugarcoat this:

1. The “Sullivan Rule” Problem

The DC Circuit and the intelligence community have a gentleman’s agreement: senior officials don’t go to prison. The political class protects its own. Breaking that norm requires a Department of Justice willing to burn the establishment to the ground — which is precisely what Trump’s second-term DOJ is signaling, but the institutional resistance is very real.

2. Statute of Limitations

Most of these offenses carry a 5-year SOL. The events in question span 2015-2017. Tolling arguments (ongoing conspiracy, concealment) can stretch that, but it’s a real hurdle. Some conduct extended into 2019-2021 with the impeachments, but the core conduct is aging.

3. Jury Pool in DC

Any trial venued in DC pulls from a jury pool where 90%+ voted against Trump. Getting convictions in that environment is extremely difficult regardless of evidence. Motions to change venue would be essential.

4. The Obama Question

Prosecuting Obama himself is a political third rail. Even with airtight evidence, the precedent of jailing a former president would trigger a constitutional crisis. The smarter play is to expose everything, name him as a co-conspirator, and let history deliver the verdict.

🎯 Bottom Line

The realistic ceiling here is probably felony convictions for Brennan and Comey — 5 to 10 years each — with lesser charges or plea deals for Clapper, Rice, McCabe, and others. Sedition charges are a stretch but not impossible if the document dump is as bad as people suspect.

The real penalty, though, is what happens when the full documentary record is released. These people built their post-government careers on being Serious Respected Statesmen™. Brennan cashed in at MSNBC. Comey wrote a bestselling book and toured as a moral authority. Clapper joined CNN. If the documents show what Trump and Gabbard are implying, their legacies don’t just take a hit — they get erased. They become the cautionary tale.

And that, more than any prison sentence, is probably what's keeping them up at night.

[Commentary | Global Ivermectin Research Hub @Ivermectinkart]

Vitamin C megadosing can halt and even reverse late stage, "incurable" cancers.

Patients with advanced cancer took 10g of IV vitamin C a day for 10 days,

then were maintained on 10g / day of oral vitamin C thereafter.

Here's one example of the power of high dose vitamin C.

This patient had advanced cancer which spread to his bones.

You can see in the X-Ray on the left (prior) how the bone was getting eaten up by the tumor.

After using vitamin C, the bone regenerated, and the patient reported clinical / biochemical remission for months.

◇ Promotes oxidative stress (selectively)
◇ Activates p53
◇ HIF1α decrease
◇ Promotes DNA demethylation
◇ Immune killing / differentiation

[Right Angle News Network @Rightanglenews]

BREAKING - Hospitals in the U.S. are advertising in Latin American countries, offering “birth packages” of up to $5,000 to foreigners to help them give birth in border states like Texas, allowing their children to be born as U.S. citizens following the new SCOTUS ruling.

[I have questions .... @tensc9]

@TheSCIF This is entirely false and you should now take caution with posts from @TheSCIF

[Frank Gaffney @frankgaffney]

The Constitution IS a Suicide Pact
https://t.co/zuq43vAwev
Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson famously observed that “The Constitution is not a suicide pact.” With yesterday’s ruling concerning so-called “birthright citizenship,” a majority of his successors on today’s Court decided that it actually is.

They declared the 14th Amendment makes absolutely everyone born here a citizen. They did so knowing that’s a formula for more illegal immigration to create “anchor babies,” giving extended families a foot in our nation’s proverbial “door.”

Worse yet, Peter Schweizer’s excellent book, Invisible Coup, put the Supremes on notice that Chinese men are exploiting the 14th Amendment to spawn perhaps as many as a million children birthed here by American women, but then removed, raised and indoctrinated entirely in China. They will have the vote upon turning 18, and unlimited access to this country before and after.

What could possibly go wrong? National suicide.

[The SCIF @TheSCIF]

Somehow an entire city council now consists of all people from Somalia in Buffalo, New York, who then raised a foreign flag on U.S. soil and canceled 4th of July fireworks...

This is an invasion. We give you an opportunity and this is the thanks we receive. It's time to wake up and kick these people out of OUR country.

I would start by auditing their elections.