ANYAKO BOY😍

|DevonSteps|Entrepreneur|Editor|Politician|Economist|#MUFC Fanatic|ManUtd Fan|100% Ayigbe|MHRS|NDC.

[ANYAKO BOY😍 @teri_devon]

JOHN DRAMANI MAHAMA will succeed as PRESIDENT of GHANA. He will outperform Nkrumah.

[ANYAKO BOY😍 @teri_devon]

This app!! 🤦‍♂️

[ANYAKO BOY😍 @teri_devon]

@Miss_Chest @IngKwabz 😅😂🤣

[ANYAKO BOY😍 @teri_devon]

@IngKwabz @Miss_Chest Them score you o

[ANYAKO BOY😍 @teri_devon]

Simple matter!!! Make government go build dema own schools & allow students do whatever the f they want! Tsw

[MPK 𓃵 @MPKwarteng_]

WESLEY GIRLS RUCKUS — RETURN MISSION SCHOOLS TO THE CHURCHES

For more than a decade, faith-based organizations have called on successive governments to return the management of mission schools to them.

Before the state took over, the churches were doing well in the management of their schools.

To quickly add, the takeover wasn’t absolute after continuous dialogue. A reason for which state-sponsored public schools do not carry same conventions as mission schools.

Public funding cannot in anyway, based on all factors, erase the conventions, principles, doctrines and strategies upon which those faith-based schools were established.

Aside erecting the schools with the widow’s might (collections) of the church members (which you do not give a dime to), they equally pay taxes same as you.

Indirectly, those members of the churches are paying twice (collections for construction of schools and health facilities, and taxes) to see the running of those schools.

I want you to know that, no organization invests with the intention to incur loses. Never! Besides, there are equally excelling public schools among the lots for people to choose from.

As President Mahama assured the Ghana Catholic Bishops’ Conference (GCBC) in run-up to the 2024 elections in September, he should re-consider the idea to hand-over mission schools to the churches.

It is not like the churches are incapable, the state forcefully took over those schools before later coming onboard to engage the faith-based organizations.

Now is the time to re-open dialogue, one that expels ambiguity and state clearer plans for the return of the mission schools.

Time to bury the recuring kerfuffle is now. The churches have been ready for their schools and the wait must be over.

[MPK 𓃵 @MPKwarteng_]

WESLEY GIRLS RUCKUS — RETURN MISSION SCHOOLS TO THE CHURCHES

For more than a decade, faith-based organizations have called on successive governments to return the management of mission schools to them.

Before the state took over, the churches were doing well in the management of their schools.

To quickly add, the takeover wasn’t absolute after continuous dialogue. A reason for which state-sponsored public schools do not carry same conventions as mission schools.

Public funding cannot in anyway, based on all factors, erase the conventions, principles, doctrines and strategies upon which those faith-based schools were established.

Aside erecting the schools with the widow’s might (collections) of the church members (which you do not give a dime to), they equally pay taxes same as you.

Indirectly, those members of the churches are paying twice (collections for construction of schools and health facilities, and taxes) to see the running of those schools.

I want you to know that, no organization invests with the intention to incur loses. Never! Besides, there are equally excelling public schools among the lots for people to choose from.

As President Mahama assured the Ghana Catholic Bishops’ Conference (GCBC) in run-up to the 2024 elections in September, he should re-consider the idea to hand-over mission schools to the churches.

It is not like the churches are incapable, the state forcefully took over those schools before later coming onboard to engage the faith-based organizations.

Now is the time to re-open dialogue, one that expels ambiguity and state clearer plans for the return of the mission schools.

Time to bury the recuring kerfuffle is now. The churches have been ready for their schools and the wait must be over.

[ANYAKO BOY😍 @teri_devon]

You go Christian school wan do otherwise. How?

[Jonathan A. Alua @abotiwine]

This GeyHey case is quite sensitive for obvious reasons, but in true fidelity to the law, the likes of Achimota School, which is a fully fledged government institution, cannot be viewed as similarly situated with Wesley Girls and other mission schools. Schools in the latter category are government assisted.

Do I agree that public schools should not entertain religious restrictions? Yes, absolutely. The only issue here is that these are not exactly public schools. The fact that a school receives funding from the state does not alter its fundamental character. What we may be losing sight of is that the establishment of these mission schools is itself an expression of the institutions’ Article 21 rights.

Perhaps it is time for the state to acknowledge how much we have failed as a nation. We should have enough fully public schools, and good ones too.

It is perfectly fine if you disagree with me. I understand how sensitive this matter is, but if you are willing to dig deeper, please look up the First Amendment Establishment Clause for comparative purposes. There is a long list of U.S. Supreme Court cases that affirm how constitutional it is for religious institutions to teach their doctrine to the exclusion of others. Of course, our context is peculiar. For example, some students are posted to these schools and do not always choose to go there. In light of this, the state, in its broader mandate to uphold secular governance, should allow students to reject such postings on religious grounds. The state should also commit to building more public schools and elevating them to the same standard as these now prestigious mission schools.

Beyond these reservations, the state cannot secularize mission schools simply because they receive public funding on a non discriminatory basis. Doing so would amount to an unwarranted curtailment of the Article 21 rights of these religious bodies.

[Jonathan A. Alua @abotiwine]

This GeyHey case is quite sensitive for obvious reasons, but in true fidelity to the law, the likes of Achimota School, which is a fully fledged government institution, cannot be viewed as similarly situated with Wesley Girls and other mission schools. Schools in the latter category are government assisted.

Do I agree that public schools should not entertain religious restrictions? Yes, absolutely. The only issue here is that these are not exactly public schools. The fact that a school receives funding from the state does not alter its fundamental character. What we may be losing sight of is that the establishment of these mission schools is itself an expression of the institutions’ Article 21 rights.

Perhaps it is time for the state to acknowledge how much we have failed as a nation. We should have enough fully public schools, and good ones too.

It is perfectly fine if you disagree with me. I understand how sensitive this matter is, but if you are willing to dig deeper, please look up the First Amendment Establishment Clause for comparative purposes. There is a long list of U.S. Supreme Court cases that affirm how constitutional it is for religious institutions to teach their doctrine to the exclusion of others. Of course, our context is peculiar. For example, some students are posted to these schools and do not always choose to go there. In light of this, the state, in its broader mandate to uphold secular governance, should allow students to reject such postings on religious grounds. The state should also commit to building more public schools and elevating them to the same standard as these now prestigious mission schools.

Beyond these reservations, the state cannot secularize mission schools simply because they receive public funding on a non discriminatory basis. Doing so would amount to an unwarranted curtailment of the Article 21 rights of these religious bodies.

[UNUSUALPHYNA🎙(phynix🔥) @unusualphyna]

Beneath the twinkling lights and festive cheer, something sinister is stirring. 😈
.
#AVeryDirtyChristmas is coming in hot 😉🔥

THIS IS JUST A TEASER ….
Are you even ready ?
.
Mark your calendars get hyped, December 16 we feast 🔥🔥

[ANYAKO BOY😍 @teri_devon]

@Miss_Chest Chale, life be simple o but we dey like complicate things

[ANYAKO BOY😍 @teri_devon]

One thing I like about @Miss_Chest he doesn’t stress about matters. The school is where it is because of its way of doing things. If it doesn’t suit you, you should humbly go to where would suit you. It’s just simple. We like to complicate things too much.

[Chris Atadika @chrisatadika]

The use of the word ‘PREVENT’ in this context is what my problem is..how does the concept of secularism enshrined in our constitution not apply here in a publicly funded institution? Someone please explain because I don’t understand..

[𝔸𝕝 𝕍𝕒𝕣𝕠 𝕏 @al_varo777]

The green guy should’ve won long time

[Everest @novieverest]

Woke up to this message from Bishop Oyedepo.

Bishop had to drop in some tongues. He is very upset.

[The Methodist Church Ghana @MethodistChGh]

Wesley Girls’ High School stands firm in its heritage and identity. The Attorney-General has affirmed the school’s right to uphold its Methodist Christian character and maintain its faith-based practices in the ongoing Shafic Osman v. ‘Gey Hey’ case.

#TheMethodistChurchGhana

[Dr Fred @F_Edzeamey]

Mission schools and their religious practices

1. A prospective student signs an undertaking to abide by all the rules and regulations of the school.

2. One of the rules states that all students must be present at all social gatherings.

3. Church services (Mass, morning devotion, etc.) are considered part of the school’s social gatherings.

4. All students, irrespective of their religion, are required to attend these functions.

5. I want to know, from a legal perspective, whether there is a problem with this.

[NEBASARK🇬🇭 @NEBASARK]

Wendy shay concert this should the highlight ❤️.. bro the security man did well. God bless him

[ANYAKO BOY😍 @teri_devon]

Even in our darkest times. 🔥

[United Insider | MUFC @UnitedInsiderX]

🚨𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 💰

Manchester United are now the second most valuable club in the world, valued at around $6.6B. 🏟️

They generated $834M in revenue last season, making them the most valuable club in the Premier League.

(@Forbes / @Deloitte)

[ANYAKO BOY😍 @teri_devon]

@niq_black Let’s wait & hear what the court thinks!

[BG @bgthaplag]

Happy Sunday from church in kwara guide yourself..... No wait for security

[ANYAKO BOY😍 @teri_devon]

Ei chale, almost them all get the AK o. Wow

[BG @bgthaplag]

Happy Sunday from church in kwara guide yourself..... No wait for security