FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
The Texas Trial Group responds to NCAA President @CharlieBakerMA (career politician and lobbyist)
Spoiler: We are sorta, kinda done with his crap. ⚖️🎯
ICYMI, NCAA President Charlie Baker calls lawsuits against the NCAA an “assault on the integrity of college athletics” but doesn’t mention the NCAA ignoring the law and treating college athletes like cattle is what created the avalanche of lawsuits.
Alexis is actually eligible based on being a plaintiff in the Washington v NCAA case pending in Tennessee state court.
So he’s an example of an athlete whose eligibility will not be affected if the Wisne preliminary injunction (Colorado case) is stayed or reversed on appeal.
@NeilRausch@samcehrlich@jasonscheer Our Ohio case clients do not have to enter the portal and are free to transfer without using the portal as so ordered by the judge in that ruling.
@twelves_tweets@samcehrlich@jasonscheer No, it is not a class action. Our focus is our clients and getting them the eligibility they are legally entitled to.
@jasonscheer@samcehrlich Ours are the Ohio ruling, the Tennessee ruling. We are awaiting the ruling in Georgia and we will be in court this week in North Carolina. We have California on file and are awaiting a date.
@jasonscheer@TexasTrialGroup Different order. You're talking about the lawsuit in Tennessee that only relates to a specific group of athletes, not the Colorado one that applies to everyone.
I know, complicated!
No, that is for our clients in the TN ruling. In Ohio ruling our clients don’t have to enter the portal. Colorado is not our clients or anything to do with our firm. Neither our Ohio or TN clients are effected by Colorado rulings - they are eligible and can transfer.
@TonyBruin No, Colorado is not our case. We are focussed on our clients and our cases. Our clients have successful rulings in Ohio and Tennessee - What happens in Colorado has zero impact on their eligibility.
“Mr. Baker,” Downton said, “derides these athletes as ‘failed professionals’ [but] that rhetoric is as disappointing as it is inaccurate.” Downton went on to say these athletes generate “billions of dollars” for colleges and others, and says they ask only “to receive the same eligibility as every athlete they competed against.” Really great article up
on Sportico.
It took more than 4 years for a judge to certify the classes in O'Bannon v. NCAA. It over a year for that to happen in Alston and House.
Last night we saw a judge do it in less than 3 weeks!
The NCAA will have some good arguments for the appeal, IMO. https://t.co/5WyI9C0hne
@JessPreusser Educate yourself Jess, that is exactly what has happened in some cases. We just love all the never a Division 1 athlete folks that have opinions on this - Newsflash being a Division 1 athlete while studying college level is in fact A REAL JOB - harder than most jobs people do.
We sincerely apologize to all the rage baiting NCAA hacks sending us vermin tweets… The firms twitter is run by moms - we ain’t got time or cares to give you, all our cares are currently allocated - please try back next week.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
The Texas Trial Group responds to NCAA President @CharlieBakerMA (career politician and lobbyist)
Spoiler: We are sorta, kinda done with his crap. ⚖️🎯
@JessPreusser@CharlieBakerMA Billable hours hmmm… Not on these cases… We work for the athletes… You probably mean the NCAA attorneys - they bill hourly and they are… raking.