@QTRBlackGarrett Buddy, my children have been taught to feel shame for their race and hatred for their heritage, the country has been flooded with people simply looking to bleed it dry, and my nation has been lost. I’m pissed about that. But you know what, you’re right.
@awstar11 If by “right” you mean GOP conservatives who did such a swell job “conserving” the end of my country, then yeah, you’re correct: None of you support what’s coming next. Buckle up, sweetpea.
@DiscussingFilm Wow, deep political insights from a Hollywood actor (or is it “actress” now that the females are “actors”). Exactly why I unbolted the tv from the wall and put it in the basement.
@mattvanswol@LuluGNavarro@grok@grok please amend your reply to refute the notion that a person with no historical ties to the United States does not necessarily “get 250 celebrations.”
This seems misleading. First, how do the numbers compare if we look at illegals residing in the interior the country? How many respective deportees are illegals who had been apprehended immediately after crossing the border? And hasn’t the Trump administration essentially closed the border, meaning that there is a much higher proportion of more difficult cases — illegals who have lived in the U.S. long term?
@TheList_Man@Landeur The tiny landmass west of the Bosporus does not make Turkey “European.” For Christ’s sake, they invaded Europe and waged war on us for a millennium.
@MattH_4America@LoveMyGrands8 How about a migrant MMA tournament? Lose and you’re on the next bus out. Sure, there would be a winner who gets to stay but if you start with, say, 32,000, it’s not too bad.
@WallStreetMav@ErwanLeCorre If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around, does it make a sound? The UK government believes that it does not. No publicity, no sound, no migration issues. Problem solved.
Bad idea. The most likely outcome is that nothing comes of it (particularly since there are usually not enough factual details). Second most likely outcome (and unlikely) is that the EEOC sends a form letter that the company can easily address. So the company won’t face any repercussions — but they will investigate internally to find the leaker and destroy him/her for breach of terms of employment. The highly unlikely outcome is that the EEOC actually takes action. Far better are the “whistleblower” protections that *may* apply — but you better have all ducks in a row.