In this house we believe:
-Emergent = good
-Natural = good
-Thought-out = retarded
-The Aztecs did nothing wrong
-Humans can only be healthy in natural lifestyles
-All premodern cultures are equal and don't belong together
-Pottery is cool
-Psychedelic fans should be hanged
The entire philosophical debate about veganism is the inevitable consequence of the abomination of moral universalism. Once you accept that its good treat others differently depending on their relation to you can immediately treat the problem sensibly.
Ten books you MUST read before you die:
Ironyscience Manifesto
Neo-Libertarian Falangism
Whatifalthist Manifesto
Right-Wing Progressivism Manifesto
Das NรK Manifest
Anarcho-Fascism
BRUV Manifesto
Current State of Hayekdogging
King Potatau
The Essential Ananda K. Coomaraswamy
Ten books you must read before you die:
Markets Not Capitalism
The Anatomy of Escape
Instead of a Book
The Individualist Anarchists
Organization Theory
Conscience of an Anarchist
Dear America
National Economic Planning: What is Left?
Total Freedom
Dialectics of Liberty
@ElijahForCA I prefer a purely individual and monarchic model of property ownership, I view it as opposed to the division of labour and something that will be naturally outcompeted, and more importantly I find its advocates annoying
My results.
Best political text Iโve ever taken, itโs detailed, takes into account nuanced economic positions, and unfolds like a choose-your-own-adventure thing.
Only critique is that there should be an option between voluntaryism and being fully pro-taxation, and an option for intervention-hesitant nationalist-liberal approaches to foreign policy.
@FabianLiberty@TocanoRR A woman is what people call women, asserting 'non-NAPtists aren't libertarians' is the same as 'trans women are women' because nobody but you believes that. There's no line between a puddle and a pond and no line between libertarian and non-libertarian.
@FabianLiberty@TocanoRR Yeah. Nobody but naptists uses anything even vaguely like the naptist definition, using that definition outside of naptist circles is inherently and necessarily bad-faith.
@FabianLiberty@TocanoRR Itโs a term for free market small-to-no-government types. Nozick was a libertarian for example. Ancaps are a subset who want no government, and not all of them believe in the NAP consistently or at all bc of Friedman.
@FabianLiberty@TocanoRR If I said that pomme means apple in French Iโm claiming thatโs how itโs used. Claiming a definition of libertarianism thatโs incompatible with its general use in general conversation is obscurantism and contrary to the communicative goal of truth seeking.
@TocanoRR@FabianLiberty Itโs simply Zuluโs influence on him and not the result of any serious thought. There is no coherent theory of definitions by which this level of exclusivity could be anything but ridiculous.