@TheHoustonWade@CBoothe_ @tiptational02 @bbox3720@SQLDuck@speculawyer@joshtpm This seems to have gotten very personal for you have and you have resorted to using your personal beliefs rather than supported facts as arguments so I guess I'll just agree to disagree👍
@TheHoustonWade@CBoothe_ @tiptational02 @bbox3720@SQLDuck@speculawyer@joshtpm This argument is pointless. Neither of us is proving anything to the other. I don't deny the merits of some evolutionary ideas to science and I would disagree with you that there is no scientific support for creation, I would just recommend you to read some of Ken Ham's work.
@TheHoustonWade@CBoothe_ @tiptational02 @bbox3720@SQLDuck@speculawyer@joshtpm You're argument is that one cannot properly perform science without believing evolution. Newton proves that one can still make advances in science without believing in evolution.
@TheHoustonWade@CBoothe_ @tiptational02 @bbox3720@SQLDuck@speculawyer@joshtpm Also, regardless of whether newton was the founder or not he was still making strides in the field of physics without even considering evolution. So again how does belief in evolution affect ones ability to do science? Isn't science meant to explore all hypotheses?
@TheHoustonWade@CBoothe_ @tiptational02 @bbox3720@SQLDuck@speculawyer@joshtpm 3. I am currently aiding in a study on salamander distribution in virginia, can you explain how my study is limited or invalid because of my belief in creation rather than evolution?