Institute for Government Accountability

Highlighting instances of governments failures of accountability on a multitude of issues. Waiting patiently for the Covid trials to begin.

[Somewherewithpaws @JustKimfromoz]

Happy Trick or Treating friends ❤️ from 🇦🇺

[Institute for Government Accountability @theRoman9]

#UFC321 Eye poke. Now Tom knows what it would be like to fight Jon Jones.

[Institute for Government Accountability @theRoman9]

🤣🤡

[Raven News @DanaMetcalfe5]

🔥🚫 Welcome to Nova Scotia: Where Hiking is a Crime and Arson is a Mystery 🚫🔥

Let’s take a moment to appreciate the sheer brilliance of modern government logic.

Drunk driving? That’ll be $1,000.
Assault someone? Just $5,000.
Speed like a maniac or vandalize public property? $400–$5,000 depending on your flair.
But… walk in the woods during a time of arbitrary restriction?
Boom. $25,000 fine.
Because apparently, your sneakers are more dangerous than a Molotov cocktail.

All in the name of “climate safety,” they say. Cute.

Meanwhile, dozens of fires are being confirmed as arson, not accidents, not carelessness — intentional acts of destruction — and what’s the government’s solution? Punish hikers. Demonize families picking blueberries. Lock down public access to land that belongs to you.

Let’s be honest: the real fire is the government’s burning desire to control your life.

And here’s the kicker:
Remember when they could track 33 million cellphones without our consent during the Ottawa convoy? Or trace a $5 donation faster than you can say “freedom”?
But now — when entire provinces are burning — suddenly, nobody knows who did it.
“Too hard to trace,” they say.
“Nothing suspicious,” they claim.
Give us a break.

If they really cared about stopping arson, they’d be launching manhunts — not handing out hiking tickets.

This isn’t safety.
This isn’t wildfire prevention.
This is political theatre and authoritarian overreach disguised as environmental concern.

You don’t punish the public for crimes committed by criminals.
You don’t fine grandmas for walking their dogs while actual fire-starters roam free.
Unless, of course, you’re not trying to stop fires — you’re trying to condition obedience.

So here’s our message:
We don’t comply with tyranny dressed in green policy.
Canadians have a right to the land, to movement, and to freedom.

And no Orwellian fine is going to
change that.

#DoNotComply
#StandForFreedom
#ClimateLockdowns
#GovernmentOverreach
#CanadianRights
#NovaScotiaFires
#WildfireTruth
#ArsonNotAccidents
#WhereAreTheArsonists
#PublicLandBelongsToThePeople
#ThisIsNotSafety
#CivilLibertiesMatter
#FreedomToRoam
#NoMoreExcuses
#TruthOverTyranny
#HikingIsNotACrime
#StopTheControl
#WeSeeThroughYou
#WakeUpCanada
#HoldThemAccountable

[Institute for Government Accountability @theRoman9]

Canada still arming Israel despite official ban, report finds, by @TheGrayzoneNews https://t.co/IR0anSwETV

[Odessa Orlewicz @OdessaOrlewicz]

This MUST SEE Documentary that was touring Canada about the CORRUPTION that goes on inside of Health Canada, and who their TRUE MASTERS are is now FREE on Twitter/X.
I made a contribution so that EVERYONE could see it.
Consider skipping Netflix tonight and watching this...

[Planet Rock @PlanetRockRadio]

In another amazing tribute to Ozzy Osbourne, the City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra (@TheCBSO) treated commuters to @BlackSabbath at Birmingham New Street Station this evening 👏

[The Babylon Bee @TheBabylonBee]

Bondi Explains She Was Going To Release The Epstein Files But Then Some Pedophiles Asked Her Not To https://t.co/UrrVsBPpbi

[The Babylon Bee @TheBabylonBee]

Support For Police Skyrockets After They Start Shooting Journalists https://t.co/gV0jbaeaYL

[Institute for Government Accountability @theRoman9]

🎯

[Julius Ruechel @JuliusRuechel]

There's a simple rule of thumb that holds up, election after election.

Districts that either benefit from govt handouts (welfare, corporte welfare, etc) or benefit from high levels of govt employment all tend to vote for left-leaning parties.

And districts that are net payees to the govt will vote conservative -- these are the people who are plundered to pay for leftist spending.

The map below of Canada as today's election results pour in is a perfect illustration of that rule of thumb.

This is why, once govt spending grows beyond a certain point, leftist parties can build loyal voting coalitions that stay loyal even when the rest of the country is completely falling apart, just to keep the money flowing to themselves.

The Romans or Medieval Europeans would have called this a patronage network, but of course in the modern era we're just a little less obvious about it. 😈

Every socialist country and banana republic from Zimbabwe to Canada and beyond functions based on this system of building loyal voter coalitions, paid for by plundering everyone else.

In Canada, 1 in 4 employed Canadians works for govt. Add on top of that the countless legal cartels and govt contracts and welfare programs of all sorts, which all depend entirely on govt spending, and that adds up to a very large and reliable leftist voting coalition. (obviously not all govt employees vote Left, but an overwhelming majority do).

According to research by the Montreal Institute, in Canada 44% of every dollar spent in the country is spent by govt. That rises 64% if you account for compelled spending triggered by regulation (like having to hire "consultants" to do an "environmental study" before you build a road or house). Through taxation and regulation, voter loyalty is bought -- a loyal patronage system.

In the end, the Libs/Left are winning not because people are stupid, but because those who benefit from Leftist spending are voting to preserve their own personal interests. It's not stupid, it's selfish. Because human nature is opportunistic. $$$ money talks.

Eventually the perverted incentives created by big govt will perpetuate big govt.

The patronage network is well-established in our socialist-leaning country. Even so-called "right wing" parties regularly cater to that network, which is why so little actually changes even when "conservative" parties get voted in.

As Maxime Bernier found out when he lost the Conservative leadership race to Andrew Sheer in 2017, those who threaten to destabilize the patronage network have no chance to get anywhere near the levers of power -- the voters in the patronage network will do whatever it takes to band together to prevent them from getting in.

This is why empires evolve from liberty towards servitude and suffocating taxation, and only a very severe crisis (usually when the money runs out) will reset that evolution to an earlier time (by shrinking govt) -- and even then it's usually a very messy reset as the "patrons" fight back (at any cost) in an effort to preserve their patronage networks, which they've come to view as their god-given right.

The real tide will turn in Canada if the West opts out, if Quebec separates, or if the cozy economic system provided by lopsided trade with the US crashes to a halt if Trump's push for reciprocal tariffs ramps up into a full-scale trade war after the election.

Canada will not change direction because of what happens at the polls -- big govt is far too entrenched for that. The change will come when parasitic patronage systems hit a brick wall as they run out of money or people to plunder.

Perhaps that crisis will come in the form of a separatist referendum. Perhaps it will be a bond or currency crisis triggered by reckless govt financial mismanagement. Or perhaps it will be Trump's trade war that brings things to a head.

All I know is that the voter incentives favor the preservation of the status quo, but that status quo is simultaneously on an accelerating path towards crisis. And so, as is usually the case when a system is unsustainable but popular, change is coming despite the fact that the majority doesn't want it to be so. And when it comes, there will be a lot of kicking and screaming as the cockroaches fight back. 😈

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

😂

[Vote Canada @VoteCanadaCom]

Justin Trudeau, @JustinTrudeau the Racist Blackface Prime Minister of Canada, has faced numerous controversies. While there’s so much more to list. Here’s some of the worst.

The SNC-Lavalin Affair is among the most significant scandals, where Trudeau was found to have improperly influenced then Minister of Justice Jody Wilson-Raybould to intervene in the prosecution of SNC-Lavalin, a Quebec-based company facing corruption charges. The Ethics Commissioner concluded that Trudeau violated conflict of interest laws for political gain, aiming to protect jobs in Quebec.

In the Aga Khan Affair, Trudeau accepted a vacation on the Aga Khan's private island, which violated conflict of interest rules due to the Aga Khan’s business dealings with the Canadian government. This incident further raised ethical concerns about his judgment.

The Blackface Controversy erupted during the 2019 election campaign when images surfaced of Trudeau wearing blackface on multiple occasions before entering politics, raising serious questions about his racial sensitivity and judgment.

The WE Charity Scandal involved the Trudeau government awarding a contract to WE Charity to administer a student grant program, despite the charity’s close ties to Trudeau’s family, who had been compensated for appearances. This led to allegations of conflict of interest and favoritism, prompting an ethics investigation.

Trudeau's 2018 trip to India faced criticism for being heavy on cultural photo ops and for the presence of Jaspal Atwal, a convicted attempted murderer, at an event with Trudeau, causing political embarrassment.

The nomination of David Johnston as an independent special rapporteur to investigate foreign interference was controversial, seen by some as an attempt to control the narrative around foreign influence in Canadian elections.

Trudeau has also been criticized for various ethics violations, including failing to disclose gifts or travel properly. His handling of the Temporary Foreign Worker Program has come under scrutiny for issues related to labor rights and the treatment of migrant workers, although this doesn’t directly involve personal scandal.

The Yaroslav Hunka incident involved recognizing a Ukrainian-Canadian man who served in a Nazi unit during WWII in Parliament, reflecting poorly on Trudeau’s administration due to lack of vetting and subsequent international embarrassment.

In terms of foreign policy, Trudeau has navigated strained relations with India and China, particularly regarding Canadian support for Sikh communities and the arrest of Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou, which led to diplomatic tensions and the detention of two Canadians in China.

Trudeau's response to the trucker convoy protests in early 2022 was controversial, particularly his invocation of the Emergencies Act, which many viewed as an overreach of government power.

His environmental policies, particularly regarding the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, have sparked criticism from both environmentalists and those advocating for economic development through natural resources, highlighting contradictions in his stance as an environmental leader.

Despite promises of reconciliation with Indigenous communities, Trudeau's administration has faced criticism for mixed results, with ongoing tensions illustrated by events like the Wet'suwet'en pipeline protests.

The ArriveCAN app implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic drew debate over its effectiveness and privacy implications, while his government's economic policies faced scrutiny for increasing national debt in response to the pandemic.

The Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC) faced significant governance issues, with allegations of mismanagement and internal resignations, leading to discussions about the misuse of funds for green technology initiatives. This situation was framed by critics as a "green slush fund," highlighting concerns over accountability.

[James Lindsay, anti-Communist @ConceptualJames]

The little tiny checkmark shape at the very right end is the alleged "global warming crisis."

[Freedom Research @freedom_rsrch]

STRIKING DOCUMENTARY: Free Speech Under Global Attack

This short documentary reveals a concerted and global attack on free speech. Will also the Western world be conquered by authoritarian regimes with hard-hitting hate speech laws and government censorship through Big Tech? Reasonable people should fight back.

PLEASE WATCH AND SHARE!

@AaronKheriatyMD @DrJBhattacharya @BrianRoemmele @catturd2
@TaraBull808 @newstart_2024 @CollinRugg
@TexasLindsay_ @wideawake_media
@DefiantLs @atensnut @TRHLofficial
@KatKanada_TM @GuntherEagleman
@ChayaRaichik10 @ericmmatheny
@wendyp4545 @nicksortor

[SJ @cafveteran]

One of the dumbest MPs in history posts before educating himself that Telesat is in fact majority owned by a US company and that Starlink is 47% owned by a Canadian that also happens to run it. Libs are not only dumb, they like to waste taxpayer $$.

[Geiger Capital @Geiger_Capital]

The collapse of healthy society and the middle class.

A direct result of catastrophic policy.

For decades now our leaders have been running the country into the ground through deficit spending and money printing. By definition, they borrowed prosperity from future generations.

[Institute for Government Accountability @theRoman9]

February 2022 was a catalyst for the world to re-open. Lest we not forget.

[Institute for Government Accountability @theRoman9]

Government Efficiency Commissioner Musk

[Jeffrey A Tucker @jeffreytucker]

Elon's explaining inflation to Trump was beautiful.

[Institute for Government Accountability @theRoman9]

Government Efficiency Commission Elon