My next newsletter "How to Find Meaningful, Unique, Customer Value" with Jim Kalbach is coming today. Subscribe to get it and stay in the loop on everything I'm creating.
https://t.co/CoqbSkB8o7
I just sent "Innovation Theatre Isn't Your Problem. It's Your Symptom." to my 1.4K+ subscribers. Be sure to get on my list to get the next one straight to your inbox.
https://t.co/CoqbSkB8o7
What a milestone 😃 Our book is ready for preorders!
Thank you to our friends, family and supporters who've helped get us this far. 💜
Thanks to the 286 people on the waitlist for taking the leap to push us into action 🚀
Massive thanks to the expert innovators who've helped co-create this book - your insights are a special part of the outcome. 🙏
And, thanks to the many innovators who've used DUCTRI Model on 300+ projects over the last 10 years which has helped us to iterate and refine the toolkit 🙌
_____
If your looking for a proven toolkit to implement innovation, we'd love to invite you to preorder here: https://t.co/gZWCCHILW6
Check out the latest article in my newsletter: Problem-solving: Why teams stop at their first idea (and what to do about it) https://t.co/z72JFlZ8wF via @LinkedIn
Major milestone today!
Christian Walsh and I have officially finalised the cover for our book.
I've been looking forward to this moment since we started working on it.
It's kinda weird - starting to see something you've been co-creating through deep thought, workshops, peer feedback, expert conversations start to come alive.
That said, I shouldn't be surprised. It's like any creative act, it's many years of field-testing, iteration and refinement to get here.
It's a powerful reminder to me that important things are hard to do.
Which is actually why we have written the book - to help thousands of innovators make an impact - easier and more effectively.
That's enough ta-dah. Back to writing.
Thanks to everyone who has and continues to support us - friends, family, contributors, beta readers, waitlisters.
If you'd like to get on the waitlist with 280+ innovators getting exclusive perks, join here:
👉https://t.co/gZWCCHILW6
#innovationinaction
You don’t need more research.
You need better discovery.
Right now, when things stall, most innovation teams do the same thing:
- Run another survey
- Commission more analysis
- Ask for “one more data point” (or worse - "one more prompt")
And somehow…
- Clarity doesn’t improve
- Decisions don’t get easier
- Momentum stays stuck
That’s not a research gap.
That’s a discovery failure.
Here’s the distinction most organisations miss:
Research answers questions.
Discovery reveals what the right questions are.
If you skip discovery, research just sharpens the wrong focus.
There’s another option…
Do less data collection.
Spend more time:
→ Watching what actually happens
→ Listening to how people describe the problem
→ Noticing contradictions
→ Sitting with uncertainty before rushing to conclusions
When discovery is done properly:
- Patterns start to show up
- Noise drops away
- Decisions feel obvious instead of forced
Not because you know more.
But because you finally understand what matters.
The teams that move fastest aren’t drowning in data.
They’re informed by insight.
Before you ask for another survey, ask this instead:
What are we trying to understand and what are we actually learning?
That question alone saves time.
Moving fast doesn’t kill innovation.
Moving fast without insight does.
Most teams aren’t reckless.
They’re under pressure.
Pressure to:
- Look decisive
- Keep momentum
- Show progress
So they move quickly into solutions, roadmaps, pilots, workshops.
The problem isn’t speed.
It’s what speed is built on.
When conversations with customers or stakeholders are:
- Polite instead of probing
- Focused on validation instead of learning
- Anchored to assumptions instead of lived experience
Speed just accelerates the wrong thing.
Real innovation doesn’t start by slowing everything down.
It starts by slowing down just enough to learn what actually matters.
The irony?
That small pause usually saves months of rework later.
The biggest mistake companies will make with innovation in 2026?
Assuming implementation will be the easy part.
The idea is approved.
The strategy looks sound.
Everyone nods.
But then reality arrives.
People feel stretched thin.
Change lands without context.
Old habits quietly reassert themselves.
And progress stalls - not because the idea was wrong, but because the work of making it real was underestimated.
I’ve seen strong initiatives fail at this point more times than I can count.
Not due to lack of intent.
But because leaders assumed change would “settle in” on its own.
It doesn’t.
Successful implementation is not about motivation or momentum alone.
It’s about designing for behaviour, emotion, and system constraints - deliberately.
That’s why change frameworks are helpful. But,
None of these work in isolation.
And none of them work if they’re treated as a checklist.
So instead of asking, “When will this be done?”
A better question is:
“What support does this change actually require, day to day, to stick?”
Good organisations plan change.
Great ones design implementation.
Which framework have you used?
—
FYI - This tension is exactly we've built Innovation in Action - a practical system for implementing human-centred innovation while still delivering BAU. Join 280+ smart innovators on the waitlist: https://t.co/gZWCCHILW6
A wandering mind is not laziness. It's problem-solving.
Going for a walk isn't avoidance. It's a way of conceiving great thoughts.
Time out isn't opting out. It's opting in to creative thinking.
Build your tortoise shell to let your whole brain work and unlock innovation.