one thing i've realized about a lot of religions is that, unless you are in a position of political power, being revered as a sacred or divine being is usually a form of dehumanization in and of itself
I think you all have a very Catholic Church-ified idea of ancient religions and ancient peoples. It can both be true for a person to be revered and prostituted, revered and sacrificed at the altar, revered and shunned. All of these were common outside of trans women.
instead of saying y is not a vowel, we should find the longest english word with no vowels, only syllabic consonants. e.g. "bull" gets pronounced with a syllabic l (i.e. as [bl̩]) in many dialects, so it has no vowels. that being said, it has four letters, but only two segments.
I'm crying some poor naga girl who has nothing to do with the argument is getting her instagram doxxed cuz losers wanna debate about what ethnicities are Indian or not on twitter dot com 😭
no hate to u but to my fellow diaspora can we take the chicken tikka masala and garlic naan stereotype back from the white people bc this is what im also contributing to the group order
all i can say atm (i haven't read many studies on this) is that i wonder if it has any correlation to which languages tend to fully borrow loanwords and which languages tend to calque them
Linguists seriously need a study on why some languages adopted six seven as the literal transliteration of the English (eg Russian children saying siks seven) vs the translation (eg roku nana in Japanese)
my parents mainly only used the term to joke about us diaspora assamese kids being american-born confused desis (abcd) and everyone who isn't assamese mainly only uses it to refer to northwestern indian culture so i've never ended up really identifying as desi
it often leads to a) americans misinterpreting people who say something isn't racism as downplaying its severity or b) from a more international standpoint, downplaying the severity of racism bc it doesn't fit into one of the other molds that are more internationally understood
I hate how we refer to xenophobia, jingoism, religious persecution, colorism, casteism, and less hierarchical kinds of ethnic conflicts as "racism" when they are all different things and most of them are distinct from racism. It leads to people downplaying or outright
ignoring elements of bigotry and systems of oppression that don't fit into the "racism" mold (pseudoscientific ideas of skin color and genetic stock and such) because people don't actually know of any other way to refer to them and so basically don't acknowledge they exist.
but in spanish, the fact that estadounidense only refers to the us and not also mexico isn't considered to be indicative of the view that the us is more important than mexico or vice versa, so it really is just a difference in language
"only usa people call themselves american, the rest of the world calls everyone from the americas american" is so untrue because basically only hispano/lusophones do that, a lot of the actual rest of the world outside latin america calls people from the usa "american" 😭
it's also interesting how there are countries other than just the usa use a name like "united states of X" but in latin american spanish, "estadounidense" only refers to people from the us, not mexicans, even though mexico is called "estados unidos mexicanos"