@DivinelyDesined It also fails to explain how animals like the predecessors to giraffes could have the traits of a giraffe and not express them. Or how pachyderms could have the genetics for a trunk and not express it.
@DivinelyDesined And I have rebutted that same sentence again and again. But you don't elaborate to show how my rebuttal is wrong. So don't act like I'm the one who's not progressing the argument you aren't
@DivinelyDesined Simply because you give a single sentence explanation does not mean that you have actually provided anything to support your position. Demons great! How your system works. I've asked you several times and you keep repeating the same one sentence.
@MartinGlennon@Tsar_Martyr That article doesn't say they are assuming a relationship, that article is saying there is evidence of a relationship because of this unique development in their lineages.
@DivinelyDesined You talk of me poisoning the well and are now asking follow up questions when you clearly understood the question earlier. You are again trying to distract from providing the explanation I asked for. (again exactly as I said you would do). You have no explanation to offer.
This is exactly why we shouldn't use memes to strawman complex theological questions, the Protestant argument in this is heresy because it denies Jesus' humanity. Perhaps let's leave these discussions where they belong.
@DivinelyDesined Now see what you did instead of providing a real answer like I asked for you tried to distract by pushing it back to me (exactly as I said) because you don't have a real answer.
@DivinelyDesined They share a common ancestor with okapi some 3,500 years ago. Other than that there are debates in the literature about how that development happened, but that part is certainly less precise.
@DivinelyDesined But every time I point this out to you, you either try to change the subject or simply stop responding. So even if your explanation is actual what creationists believe then there is no reason to take the explanation seriously.
@DivinelyDesined No I'm providing what creationists believe. As I keep pointing out your explanation doesn't work and has zero evidence. The genes in giraffes would be detrimental to other animals and there is no evidence of them in their ancestors.
@ArkEncounter Please explain this further because your canines include foxes which have drastically different chromosomes from other canines. Are you suggesting that hesperocyon (your dog rep on the Ark) carried multiple different chromosomes for each species?
@AiG If he's lying why didn't you answer the challenge? He asked specifically about caring for the animals not whether they could fit on the Ark. Your evasion of the question makes you look foolish. Especially since he asked that 15 years ago and you can't answer it.