amigox

[amigox @theamigox]

we are all ND4.eth

[amigox @theamigox]

On-chain history shows nd4.eth was part of a tightly connected wallet cluster involving noth.eth, endit.eth, ndnow.eth, ndall.eth, enditall.eth, blackholefaller.eth and taovoid.eth — months before the nd4 private key was made public. robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45

[amigox @theamigox]

@Sllem_g Yes, that's interesting.

[amigox @theamigox]

@bsvistheWay I'm also curious to see what happens next.

[amigox @theamigox]

I followed the robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 creator fees.
And what I found is more interesting than I expected.

The question was simple: How much did the creator actually make — and where did the money go?

So I went through the transactions.

1. Early creator fees
On September 9, the creator-fee recipient was transferred to: 0xeA13...731a

From there, Pons paid this wallet: 54.98 ETH in creator fees. At today's ETH price, that's roughly $136K.

Sounds bearish, right?

Not so fast.

2. I followed the money
The obvious question was whether those 55 ETH were sent to a CEX, bridged out, or distributed across fresh wallets.

They weren't.

The treasury currently still holds: 50.62 ETH ≈ $125K plus roughly $6.5K in tokens.

So the majority of those early creator fees are still sitting publicly on-chain.

3. Then the strategy changed
The creator redirected future Pons fees to another wallet: 0x64Cf...228C

This is where things get interesting. I analyzed its transactions, internal transfers and token transfers.

In ~19 hours it received: 1.8619 ETH in Pons creator fees.

That ETH was systematically used to acquire robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45.

Result: 10,823,028 ND4 acquired.

Then: 10,823,028 ND4 → 0x000...0000

100% burned.

Not locked.

Not transferred to another treasury.

Burned.

That's roughly 1.08% of the original supply destroyed through this wallet alone.

4. So here's the current setup
Early fees: ~55 ETH → treasury
Most of it is still there.

New fees: Pons fees → buy robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 → burn robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45
And the treasury itself still controls: 50.62 ETH + ~20M ND4. Which leads to the most interesting question.

What happens to the treasury next?

Because ~50 ETH is not a small amount relative to robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45's current liquidity. If even a meaningful part of it eventually becomes: TREASURY → BUY robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 → BLACK HOLE things could get very interesting.

And if the creator makes the new fee buyback-and-burn mechanism irreversible... then the entire robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 narrative changes.

For now, one thing is clear: I couldn't find the big creator cash-out I expected. The money is still on-chain. And the new fees are being fed into the black hole.

I'm watching what happens next.

CA: 0xa43a9b6EEdD8204F445237Bf72775eD9b1723d45

Join in and follow my position here: https://t.co/bFD8mLKQtR

amigox – discount code for the commission fee

robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 #RobinhoodChain

[amigox @theamigox]

@disjunct we are all ND4.eth

[amigox @theamigox]

@bicc8eth This is interesting

[amigox @theamigox]

One suggestion for $ND4:
The creator-fee buyback & burn mechanism is a great step. But right now, it still depends on trust. The fee destination can be changed. The mechanism can be stopped.

If the philosophy is truly: “No leader. No savior. Only the black hole.”
Then take it one step further. Make creator fees permanently flow into an immutable contract that automatically:
collects fees → buys $ND4 → burns $ND4
No admin switch. No treasury access. No way to redirect the fees later. Make the black hole irreversible.
That would turn $ND4 from a promise into a protocol.

And it would fit the original philosophy perfectly.

[amigox @theamigox]

@nd4doteth we are all nd4.eth🫡

[amigox @theamigox]

I went down the robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 rabbit hole.

And I think I found the detail everyone missed.

1. It starts in 2023.
nd4.eth becomes one of Ethereum’s strangest mysteries after burning millions of dollars in crypto.
2,500 ETH. GMX. GNS. NFTs. Then, on September 17, 2023, the wallet leaves this message on-chain: “Nobody in this world is not nd4.eth as nobody in this world is not Satoshi Nakamoto.” Followed by a mysterious 64-character string. At first, I thought it was just a hash. It wasn’t.

2. That string is the private key to nd4.eth.
Read that again. Right after saying that nobody in this world is NOT nd4.eth... he publicly revealed the key to become nd4.eth. From that moment, the wallet no longer belonged to one person. Anyone could control it. Anyone could become ND4. Suddenly, the message makes sense.

3. Almost 3 years later, something happens.
A token called robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 launches on Robinhood Chain.
I checked the creator - 0xEfbBc3...56F7
The same nd4.eth wallet.But now we know something crucial: This DOESN’T prove the original whale came back. The private key had been public since 2023. Someone else could be controlling it.

4. Then a new @nd4doteth account appears.
And posts: “Nobody in this world is not nd4.eth as nobody in this world is not Satoshi Nakamoto.” Then adds: “It was written all along.” That sentence hits completely differently now. Because it literally WAS written all along. The key was sitting on-chain for almost 3 years.

5. And this might be the entire point.
Maybe ND4 never wanted to create an identity around one anonymous person. Maybe he wanted to destroy the identity itself. He burned his ETH. Burned his tokens. Burned his NFTs. Then effectively gave the wallet away to the entire world. And years later, someone picked it up... and launched robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 .

So maybe asking: “Is this the original nd4.eth?” misses the entire point.

Because since September 17, 2023... anyone could literally be nd4.eth. And maybe that’s exactly what he told us from the beginning.

robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45

CA: 0xa43a9b6EEdD8204F445237Bf72775eD9b1723d45

Join in and follow my position here: https://t.co/bFD8mLKQtR

#Robinhood #RobinhoodChain

[amigox @theamigox]

I have one crazy theory about robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45.
And the deeper you dig on-chain, the less crazy it starts to sound.
In 2023, the nd4.eth wallet became one of Ethereum’s strangest mysteries.
He didn’t just lose money.
He deliberately sent assets into a black hole:
— 2,500 ETH
— GMX
— GNS
— expensive NFTs
Millions of dollars simply disappeared forever.
But the most interesting part came later.
On September 17, 2023, that same historical wallet left an on-chain message:
“Nobody in this world is not nd4.eth as nobody in this world is not Satoshi Nakamoto.”
And next to it:
26e9d4d541307f70210e1f72661c7ea7bf30d6f657d841482ba251acde68a410
Then — silence.
Almost 3 years pass.
And suddenly, the robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 token appears.
Not a token created by someone simply calling themselves ND4.
The token’s creator is the exact same historical address that burned millions of dollars.
After the launch, a new X account appears.
And it writes again:
“Nobody in this world is not nd4.eth as nobody in this world is not Satoshi Nakamoto.”
Then:
“It was written all along.”
Coincidence?
Maybe.
But then it gets even stranger.
The creator starts buying his own robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45.
Some of those purchased tokens are sent into a black hole / burned.
So years later, the same pattern appears again:
BUY → BURN → NOTHING.
And here’s my theory.
What if ND4 was never a person?
What if nd4.eth was never trying to create an identity, but an idea?
Look at the wording:
“Nobody in this world is not nd4.eth.”
Not:
“I am nd4.”
But literally:
Nobody is NOT nd4.
Meaning ND4 could be anyone.
Almost like Satoshi Nakamoto.
We still don’t know who Satoshi is.
But Bitcoin exists independently of its creator’s identity.
Maybe that’s exactly what ND4 was trying to say back in 2023.
He destroys his wealth.
Destroys his NFTs.
Destroys his identity.
Leaving behind only a wallet, messages, and a black hole.
And years later, a meme is born from that exact same wallet.
Then maybe robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45 isn’t just a meme about someone who burned millions.
Maybe it’s a meme about the idea itself:
No leader.
No guru.
No savior.
No identity.
Only the black hole.
And here’s the uncomfortable part for the skeptics.
Even if the private key changed hands later — the philosophy still works.
Because if “everyone can be ND4,” then a new operator doesn’t break the narrative.
He continues it.
Which is why the question:
“Is this the original person?”
might be the wrong question entirely.
The real question is:
Was ND4 ever a person at all?
robinhood:0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45
Join and follow him here: https://t.co/bFD8mLKQtR

[amigox @theamigox]

@vladtenev That is absolutely correct. The current times dictate their own conditions for development.

[amigox @theamigox]

@ddivixx we are all ND4.eth
CA: 0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45

[amigox @theamigox]

@theunipcs we are all ND4.eth

[amigox @theamigox]

we are all ND4.eth

CA: 0xa43a9b6eedd8204f445237bf72775ed9b1723d45

[amigox @theamigox]

@nd4doteth Having nothing, we acquire everything.

[amigox @theamigox]

It's a legend.

[nd4.eth @nd4doteth]

we are all nd4.eth
now you understand

[amigox @theamigox]

@eveyino We believe in the leader—we are all leaders.

[amigox @theamigox]

@nd4doteth Having nothing, we acquire everything.