@justarolloftape To me this is the interesting part. Whether it was a remote explosive or a bullet from a rifle, deleting the scene of the crime prevents further forensic analysis. Obfuscates the incident. Causes misdirection and wacky theories to arise. Uncertainty is a win for the perpetrators.
@justarolloftape Again, if the cord was draped around the back and left of his head (which is how these are often worn in a horseshoe shape) and then down to clip, and if there was expansion on his left shoulder/torso it would have caused the mic clip to move towards the entry wound.
@justarolloftape I believe the lav cord was draped around his neck, not directly down from ear. Neck/chest expansion would throw that in any direction depending on what part of his body expanded first.
@justarolloftape I donโt understand why youโre certain youโd see an entry wound thatโs less than half of an inch wide in the first or second frame. Itโs a puncture in elastic skin, not a tear or a gash. Expansion occurs several inches deep. Until then, everything behind the bullet is a vacuum.
@justarolloftape How many high-powered rifle neck shot videos have you analyzed to determine at what frame a 0.3 inch entry wound should become obvious?
In a case with countless oddities and blatant coverups, this question is one of the least compelling.
@justarolloftape Ballistics and fluid mechanics arenโt so clear-cut when arteries, bone, and lung tissue (which is full of air, and surprisingly soft / light) etc are involved. Ballistic gel and dead pork meat are not analogs for living human flesh as Iโve seen some debunkers try to claim.