@sean_a_mcclure Another factor: the ‘smart’ ones often get in their own way by either over planning before starting or over analysing feedback. The ‘dumb’ ones keep going and build a body of work substantially larger than the smart ones and ultimately that’s what society sees and rewards.
This is the zero procrastination life. Not a life without hard days, but one without a gap between who you are and what you are doing.
Notice what you never had to do. You never had to find motivation first. You never had to fix yourself before starting. You needed one rep small enough to do anyway, and enough of them to let the evidence make its case.
Procrastination is not laziness, and it is not poor time management. It is closer to self-care. The work in front of you triggers anxiety, self-doubt, or boredom, and avoiding it brings immediate relief. That relief is the whole mechanism. 1/
This is where the flywheel starts to turn on its own. The reps stop being small, unthinking actions and become expressions of who you already are.
That shift matters because it changes what failure means. When the work expresses your identity rather than chases an outcome, you are no longer risking anything by doing it.
You are just doing what you do. The anxiety that once needed an outcome to grab onto finds nothing there. 7/
@BonesawMD Your posts hit home every single time!
The desperation to close the gap between where we are and where we want to be prevents us from doing the work that will actually close that damn gap.
embrace your status as a novice first to have any hope of gaining mastery.
There is a voice in your head narrating your life, and you have heard it so continuously that you mistake it for the life.
But here is the truth: the commentary and the experience are not the same thing, and they frequently disagree. Most of what you call a bad day is the narration, not the day. You can sometimes simply stop listening.
You believe you reasoned your way to your values. But you almost certainly absorbed them before you could reason at all, then built the justifications afterward to fit.
The implication: the beliefs you defend most passionately are the ones you examined least, because inherited certainty never asks to be checked.
Most people believe they hold their opinions because of the evidence.
The sequence runs the other way.
The opinion arrives first, shaped by identity and need, and the evidence gets recruited later to justify it. This is why facts so rarely change minds. They were never the foundation, only the scaffolding.
Envy is a highly reliable signal of what you want.
What we say we want is driven by what seems realistic, socially acceptable, or consistent with our self-image.
Envy bypasses all of that. It fires at the thing itself, before any of those filters engage, which makes it the more honest of the two inputs.