Overseer

Working on my own little indie game.
3D artist. Level design. Generalist. Part time shitposter. Anti-censorship. Communism is Evil. DEI must DIE. A kinda ok guy

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

Sadly looks like two great distros bent over to take BB's cock and implement age verification, i would expect this from corpo fag distros like fedora and ubunto, but seeing Arch and cachyOs doing this is just sad. Time to migrate to Artix that actually has values and principals!

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@HoshinoSaikyo @cybercaturday @CachyOS Commie

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@belirtilmedi11 @CachyOS Not activated, so it is there and I am right.
Thank for the verification 😁

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@belirtilmedi11 @cybercaturday @CachyOS It's already in systemd, just not activated yet, so they are just waiting..

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@cybercaturday @CachyOS Yes they are, every distro using systemd without removing the age attestation code are.
Has nothing to do with lunduke except he is a good source and all the commies hate him.

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@Robbie_Gibbs @CachyOS They can just add a not legal to use in California to their licensens and save everybody else, no one forces them to follow California law.

[Eva Vlaardingerbroek @EvaVlaar]

More than 200,000 people have signed The @SaveEuropeAct in less than a week. Brussels will soon find out that European patriots are a force to be reckoned with.

Thank you all so much!

We are now in the process of filing the Citizens Initiative and the confirmation email issue should be fixed today. We’ll keep you posted and let’s get that number up even further!

Let’s go!

[Save Europe Act @SaveEuropeAct]

200.000 Europeans have raised their voices for the Save Europe Act.

Thank you for your support!

The journey continues.
Next milestone: 500.000.

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@sdeuparlamentet @Qwant_FR Skip qwant and google and use privacy first brave search.

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@MrLewdacris Shaders are expensive mate.

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@carlosarmmag @DigitalEU Read about the DSA, chat control and now digital id, then tell me that the EU isn't coping china and north Korea...

[Mullvad.net @mullvadnet]

So-called age verification for social media is spreading across the world, framed as an effort to create a safer internet for children. In reality, age verification lays the foundation for a fully controlled internet.

The age verification rush must be slowed down, and politicians need to recognize the consequences of different types of legislation and systems.

Age verification is the wrong approach to fix “the social media problem”
The big tech social media companies are bad. Their business model is bad; it is based on mass surveillance and manipulation, and they cooperate with governments in mapping entire populations. But age verification is fundamentally the wrong approach to preventing children from using big tech social media platforms. Introducing age verification is based on coercion; the state forces social media companies to verify their users’ identities. But the big tech social media platforms already know which of their users are children. Their business model depends on knowing this. They know how old users are, and they know exactly what type of person they are. As age verification is based on coercion, politicians could instead force platforms to stop doing the things politicians consider harmful to children, or force them to block children (again, they know who they are) from using their services. But instead, politicians seek to massively invade everyone’s privacy and undermine democratic rights on a global scale. In other words, the latter is the real objective – they do not want to protect children; they want to impose control.

Slippery slope of age verification
It is undeniable that age verification threatens freedom of expression, risks increasing mass surveillance, and is likely to lead to censorship. It will not only shrink the online world and reduce young people’s right to privacy (for example, if VPN services were to be restricted); but also risks becoming a significant step toward a controlled internet for everyone.

Most age verification is identity verification
Most countries are now considering introducing age verification systems, meaning that everyone would have to identify themselves either to the service/website they want to use or to a third party capable of linking them to their activity on that service or website. This is not age verification but identity verification, and the consequence is therefore that freedom of information is restricted (you can no longer visit regulated websites anonymously) and that you can no longer post anonymously on social media. This is a major problem in countries like the UK and Germany where the police conduct raids on people’s homes for posting content on social media that the authorities dislike. Or in the United States, where authorities are trying to pressure tech companies into revealing the identities behind accounts protesting ICE. Social media identity verification removes important tools for activists in countries where criticizing those in power is dangerous.

Restrictions on app store or operating system level
Some countries are looking to impose identity verification at the app store level or even within the operating system itself. This is an exciting experiment, since this is possible to circumvent using open-source operating systems. Some countries are already looking to include open-source systems. Since open-source systems cannot be controlled, politicians would ultimately need to ban devices that are not controlled by the state. The end point: telescreens like those in Orwell’s 1984, devices that both monitor you and broadcast only the information approved by the state.

The Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) alternative and the EU
The EU has presented its own age verification app as “completely anonymous”. The idea is to use Zero-Knowledge Proof (ZKP) cryptography to break the link between the age credential issuer (EU governments) and the regulated services/sites. Currently, the EU app does not have ZKP functionality, contrasting Ursula von der Leyen’s claim that the app ”is technically ready to be used”. But more importantly, the app is currently designed to always function without ZKP technology; if ZKP is unavailable, the app falls back to a non-ZKP model. Even if fully developed ZKP technology could be implemented in the future, it would remain an optional extra feature that countries may choose to disable and that the EU could remove at any time.

Read more on our site.
https://t.co/wTVKHMS1zg

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@Rosencrantz_J Och ni är alla retarderade nyttiga idioter!

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@DigitalEU You misspelled mass surveillance and censorship...

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@DigitalEU @HennaVirkkunen More shit, from shit politicians.

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@Ru_NRD @aakashgupta Consumers consum.

[Lara Logan @laralogan]

Just to be clear: The findings of the two week inquiry into the Pakistani rape gangs in England produced sworn testimony that included a girl who described her terror when she was held down and they brought in dogs to rape her. That actually happened. She described one man holding down her head and staring into her eyes as she was raped by a dog. She said they did it to break her.

[Overseer @TheDarkProjects]

@DigitalEU Regulations and censurship is all the EU has, time for it to die