@milesdeutscher@aiedge_ I'm a beginner in this topic but can loops be considered or implemented as an optimization algorithm? Let's say, continue until objective function < x? Or more complex (using ML models), e.g., find the best ANN parameters to maximize accuracy on the n fold cross validation?
@NeverSinkDev Very interesting, as a researcher and computer science background I share your thoughts. Right now, AI is quite dangerous as people with no coding experience believe they're already programmers. This produces code with logical errors and complete useless/overtrained AI models
I've been debating if I wanted to post this... because this is genuinely TERRIFYING me.
I've been using Claude Code with Opus 4.6 and the leap it made over the last year is terrifying.
Context: I'm a developer with well over 15 years of experience. I'm using the AI for an evolution sandbox simulation.
The AI frequently 1shots tasks that would take me 4-16 hours.
I'm steering it and creating a lean architecture by guiding the AI and writing the main classes myself. Right now is probably the sweet spot where your knowledge as an experienced developer can turn you into a 100x developer.
However, that's not the point.
I'm afraid (and I hope to be wrong) that within the next 5-10 years any developer, manager, most research and most jobs that we see as 'high profile thinking tasks' will become obsolete.
This is honestly a future I dread. The cultural consequences will be absurd.
What's your take?
PS1: I'm withholding usage of AI for anything creative and critical (including my filter/filterblade projects).
PS2: I'm training myself no matter what project I use to always have at least 2-3 hours of writing code by hand every day to stay sharp, but practically I can now be around 10x more efficient, by delegating agents and guiding them to build the right architecture.
PS3: If you think creative or management jobs are not at risk, unfortunately I believe chances are very high that you're wrong.
The Only EMA System You’ll Ever Need (Used the Right Way)
Price doesn’t “respect” indicators.
It respects the average cost of smart money.
That’s all EMAs are.
EMA = context, not magic.
• EMA 9 → Intraday traders
• EMA 21 → Swing traders
• EMA 50 → Trend traders
• EMA 200 → Investors & big trends
Different EMAs = different players.
Market control rule:
Price above EMA → Buyers in control
Price below EMA → Sellers in control
High-probability filter:
✔ Price above 200 EMA
✔ 21 EMA above 50 EMA
✔ Pullback toward 21 EMA
✔ Volume dries up on pullback
✔ Buy only on bullish candle near 21 EMA
Trend phases:
1️⃣ Initiation
2️⃣ EMA pullback
3️⃣ Momentum expansion
4️⃣ Weakness (stop chasing)
Exit like a pro:
• Take partials at 1:2 RR
• Move stop to breakeven
• Trail with 21 EMA
• Exit fully if price closes below 50 EMA
EMAs don’t predict.
They protect you from bad trades.
Trade with context. Stay patient.
It seems that we have just entered the fasters industrial revolution ever. If you think that it won’t impact your job one way or another in next few years, keep dreaming and good luck with your mortgage.
@NeverSinkDev@Zizaran He was too rude. I actually loved Poe2 patch and have been enjoying quite a lot. Everyone bashing at GGG is not fair. It's even an early access
@pathofexile please dont trivialize the game by making it much easier or by bombarding us with loot. Loot inflation was the downfall of d3/4. I loved d2 because getting an actual good item could take even years (grandfather, windforce, etc). The game difficulty is fine, the loot was good too
@POE2Alerts i agree having not traversal askills, it trivializes the figths. I would suggest having the option to teleport to the checkpoints with a single right click (once the area around the checkpoint has been cleared or something).