@Jenysen1 @brotobrooo @_falsi1ke If you truly knew your worth you’d know it wasn’t a chase, just not an over-impatience. A girl like that desires nothing more than to submit to your lead. You think she should expose herself after one text?
You’re lucky she’s even giving you the eyes… she sucks at hardtoget
@hannaahhn@writersdawn You’re not gonna get anywhere by ignoring the male gaze. Anything hot is arousing, so you gain attetion from arousing men, aka a whore. You want to appreciate your style in innocence, make sure there isn’t any hotness, or do it with your female friends. Ignorance isn’t an excuse
@roseysunlotus@lporiginalg Yes, stay single and focus on raising her daughter until 18 or return to the real father. Stepparents can never replace real parents. They come between mother and child and don’t support mother and child. The children know this the most.
@PavlovsCat6@sirslender@CoralieAlison That’s precisely why women shouldn’t vote. Women in power can’t help but know everything about everyone’s intentions. And voting is power.
You’ll ruin freedom in pursuit of your solipsism. And in return, you’ll ruin your very selves.
Women shouldn’t be homemaking society.
@immensitysea @IrisLundquist@sirslender@KellEastCoast@Sadprosehoe@CoralieAlison Who wants to live under a gov where every single aspect of your existence is regulated by the subjective morality of the majority? Where would we draw the line ??
It may seem intuitive to draw the line at victimless cp fantasies, but in actuality that is
completely subjective.
@immensitysea @IrisLundquist@sirslender@KellEastCoast@Sadprosehoe@CoralieAlison And it’s justifiably illegal because it infringes upon the rights of someone else. Not because of how subjectively evil we deem it.
If we create laws based on subjective evil NOT actual victims. Wouldn’t that just create an evil judiciary system within itself? +
@IrisLundquist@sirslender@KellEastCoast@Sadprosehoe @immensitysea @CoralieAlison But that EXACTLY the point. It doesn’t matter how evil something is for it to be outlawed. What matters is that it objectively infringes upon the rights of someone else.
There are billionaires who knowingly watch famines whipe out entire populations. More evil, perfectly legal.
@DerrickRDixon@sirslender@CoralieAlison If we do what objective reasoning do we have to do so? Because that is what laws should be based on. Objective realities. Not your subjective empathy for innocent children getting tortured but not innocent adults.
@rioblurs@Hoodie_Milly@CoralieAlison His point was that murder is just as wrong as grape. So why ban simulated grape but not murder?
You now bring the argument of urge for simulated violence into play. But that still doesn’t actually change anything. Why is sim murder justifiable for relieving aggr but not grape