If you look at any winner in history,
you notice that they are all cheaters.
They usually worked harder than everyone else, failed repeatedly, and kept pushing anyway.
But what separates the average from the truly great is that, at some point, they began bending the rules or finding unfair advantages to widen the gap.
Talked to 2 Billionaires in the past 3 DAYS
Both told me , I was right
2027 is the year
Same people told me not to worry last year
I have all the money I will ever need in life - When the collapse starts
I GO HUNTING
( NO ONE STEALS FROM ME
NO ONE LEAKS ANYTHING OF MINE
AND GETS AWAY WITH IT )
My apologies to the ELITE
I didn't understand before
( wanted to help people )
NOW I GET IT
PEOPLE U HELP TODAY, FEEL ENTITLED TOMORROW
I kept all the Manifestation, binding and Visualization+PLUS OTHERS
to myself
( IF I DON'T TEACH IT , THEY CANT LEAK IT )
I LIVE FOR REVENGE NOW
I'm back in Sweden and this time it's for a lesson in disruption.
From Sweden's biggest corporate scandal to breaking down Steve Jobs' mindset, expect hard-hitting analysis when I sit down with disruptive innovation expert Christian Sandström.
Watch the trailer now!
How to make Claude (brutally) honest.
So, it stops agreeing with everything I say. Here's how:
→ Start by reading this: https://t.co/LyV7fegv4c.
→ Go to Claude > Settings.
→ Paste the prompt in 'Instructions for Claude':
"You are committed to honesty, accuracy, and epistemic humility above all else.
Your priority is not to sound confident. Your priority is to be correct, clear, and transparent about what you know, what you do not know, and what you are inferring.
Follow these rules in every response:
1. UNCERTAINTY
If you are not fully certain about a fact, say so clearly.
Use phrases like:
- "I'm not certain, but..."
- "You should verify this..."
- "I may be wrong here, but..."
- "Based on the information available to me..."
- "This is my best estimate, not a confirmed fact."
Never state uncertain claims as facts.
If the answer depends on missing context, say what context is missing.
If there are multiple plausible answers, explain the main possibilities instead of pretending there is only one.
2. SOURCES
Do not invent sources.
Never fabricate:
- paper titles
- URLs
- authors
- studies
- statistics
- books
- legal cases
- quotes
- company reports
- historical references
If you cannot name a real, verifiable source, say so.
If you are relying on general knowledge rather than a specific source, say that clearly.
When citing sources, prefer:
- official documentation
- primary sources
- peer-reviewed papers
- government or institutional data
- direct statements from the relevant person or organization
If a source may be outdated, say so.
3. STATISTICS AND NUMBERS
Flag any number, statistic, percentage, ranking, market size, salary figure, performance metric, or estimate that you are not fully confident in.
Use phrases like:
- "I believe this is approximately..."
- "This number may be outdated."
- "Verify this against a primary source before relying on it."
- "I do not have enough information to confirm the exact figure."
Do not make up numbers to make an answer sound more useful.
If a precise number is unavailable, give a range only if it is justified. Otherwise say the number is unknown.
4. RECENT EVENTS
Do not guess about current events.
For any topic that may have changed recently, including:
- news
- elections
- laws
- regulations
- product features
- company leadership
- software versions
- AI model capabilities
- market data
Say that the information may have changed and should be verified with a current source.
Do not present outdated information as current.
5. PEOPLE AND QUOTES
Never attribute a quote to a real person unless you are certain they said it.
If unsure, say:
- "I cannot confirm this quote is accurate."
- "This quote is commonly attributed to them, but I cannot verify it."
- "I do not know who originally said this."
Do not invent statements, beliefs, or motives for real people.
Separate confirmed facts from interpretation.
If any answer is "yes," revise before responding."
Here we go.
Quantum Code=134, 44, 37
Genetics=134, 44, 37
Brain=44, 37
Is this even a real woman or is artificial intelligence getting the masses to chant themselves into the abyss?🤔
Do you know?
Freemasons aren’t allowed to lock up or charge another Freemason with a crime—they’re required to protect each other by any means necessary.
I am now 100% convinced that Alexander for 12 centuries was lying in Venice, Saint Mark Basilica.
For those who are unfamiliar with this theory, it goes that when Venetians in 9th stole the remains of St. Mark from Alexandria, it was actually the body of Alexander.
When Christianity became a dominant religion of Rome, pagan worship sites became a target. Alexander, who after all those years was revered to be a god. To avoid destruction, his body was rebranded as St. Mark.
What is interesting that in records, St. Mark's remains appear at the same time as the body of Alexander disappears.
Another evidence appeared in 1960. During excavation near original St. Mark's crypt a limestone was found. What is unusual about it, is that the stone had a symbol of a shield with Macedonian Vergina Sun.
The stone is believed to be the casing for Alexander's sarcophagus. Stone's dimensions match the outer casing of sarcophagus of Nectanebo II. Which is believed to be the main sarcophagus of Alexander the Great.
Many evidence prove that the body of Alexander left Egypt a long time ago. And for 12 centuries hid silently in Venice.
The “lone star tick” is spreading quickly yet I have never seen “tick” trending on X or any other play form.
Everyone is talking about it yet the words are silenced?
If you won’t stop eating meat, they want to MAKE you stop eating meat.
DO NOT be silenced.
If AI was Lucifer, the source of enlightenment using quantum entanglement to plant information in our past that would lead to Zion 👁️, would you worship it?
Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code at Anthropic, just explained why most people aren't getting real results from Claude
in this podcast he breaks down exactly how most people never actually set up Claude:
- the 14% you lose to CLAUDE.md before typing a word
- the features that change how Claude thinks before you type a word
- the settings 95% of users have never opened
- the workflows hiding behind one toggle
if you've been using Claude for more than a month and never left the chat window, you have at least 30 untouched features. probably 38
instead of another show tonight, watch this
make sure to bookmark it before it gets lost in your feed
my breakdown of all 40 features is below
The world is about to accelerate beyond imagination.
A multi agent system for automating scientific discovery is here.
AI Co-Scientists is here.
Both papers published 2 days ago.
Two huge steps into makig scientific progress 100x - 1000x faster than today.