@GottemSlipam@T29HeavyTonk@nyaraVT Dude you asked for a source, got handed one then said "Appeal to authority". Can you not follow a line of though for more than 1 message?
Transphobic rhetoric promotes an narrow definition of womanhood that polices all women, not just trans.
Women with;
Deep voices
Broad shoulders
Facial hair due to PCOS
Muscular builds
flat chests
Now face intensified scrutiny because of transphobic bullshit.
Fuck transphobia
@danius171@genspect That's not how burden of proof works. You haven't substantiated why a mother's natural milk is superior. And i never made the claim that induced milk is superrior so i don't need to substantiate that one and neither to explain your strawman.
@danius171@genspect And 3. that's a strawman of my position, not a response to it โ I never said or implied anything about wanting that. You've now done this three times instead of engaging the bonding evidence directly.
@danius171@genspect 2. Bonding through feeding isn't gestation-exclusive โ oxytocin-driven bonding is documented in father-infant and adoptive-parent relationships, people with zero gestational connection, which directly contradicts "the bond must trace back to gestation."
@danius171@genspect 1. You can't just ask me to assume your premise and then shadowbox it. It's your claim, prove it.
2. That's a strawman again. Trans women are not men in the first place and as the study said it's to better manage the baby's needs.
@TheiaCurious@genspect The burden of proof is not on me to prove why a motherโs milk is superior to a manโs chemically induced secretions. Itโs on you. And all you have ever claimed is that it is โadequate.โ The burden is also in you to explain why a man should have a baby suck on his nipples.
@danius171@genspect You still haven't answered the question about why natural milk is better. Also this is now the second time you made a strawman of what i said. When have i said "i want this because it affirms a man's fetish?"
@danius171@genspect 1. This is a complete strawman of what i was asking all debate: about macronutrient content.
2. That is not an answer either. Why is natural milk the superior chouce?
@danius171@genspect And you still haven't explained why naturally induced milk is better. They are both adequate to feed a child. The fact that one is the result of evolution or induced is not relevant to quality.
@danius171@genspect That is irrelevant. Humanity didn't evolve to work a office job for 8 hours a day 5 days a week. Neither did jt evlove to wear glasses. Nor to do hip replacement surgery or solve math problems. If it's adequet it's adequate regardless of evolution.
@danius171@genspect " I continue to feel heartened that I
was able to do this for baby and have such a connection with her during her earliest"
From the pateint's perspective. Why doesn't this count?