The most dangerous line in an AI rollout right now: "We're confident we can manage the agents."
Confidence isn't control.
Control is naming who's accountable when the agent does something you didn't expect.
Most teams have the confidence. Almost none have the name.
Your AI agent didn't go rogue.
Companies keep reporting the same surprise: the agent reached into data no one meant it to touch.
Nobody was assigned to decide what it could reach. So it decided.
You can't govern a machine you never gave an owner.
Is it just me or is @AnthropicAI@claudeai Opus 4.8 sassy? Keeps trying to use my own rationale against me. Does answer questions when I press. Part of me likes the philosophical debates, but maybe not the best use of tokens?
Facts! Increase in what’s possible not increase in job loss! As a leader of a tech team, our backlog is only limited to our imagination using AI. Requests and demands only increases, leading to greater efficiencies in the org. Creates more opportunity not less!
There will be no “jobs apocalypse” due to AI — but there will be job chaos.
Our 2025 AI Job Impacts Analysis found that starting in 2028-2029, AI will create more jobs than it eliminates. Yet, each year, over 32 million jobs will be significantly transformed.
Explore and plan for the four scenarios for human workers in the age of AI: https://t.co/tRKgnNOCNO
The company owning @24hourfitness is buying @pizzahut. Would a crossover include 24 hour Pizza Hut, or Pizza Hut subscriptions people pay for but don’t actually use?
Any advertisements in New York that feature artificial intelligence-generated people in place of actors will now be violating state law if they don't clearly label that they have used a “synthetic performer.” https://t.co/7HOvmWbtV2
The death of SaaS narrative assumes organizations want to build their own systems.
Most don’t.
They want clarity, speed, and control over their data.
That’s different.