@HTXsamIam@Timcast Ignorant fu¢k, you literally contradicted yourself posting the policy because vehicular assault/attempted vehicular homicide would be justification. This wasn’t a warning shot at a vehicle already in motion. It was to stop a threat!
@adhd143@Timcast Another ignorant a$$hole post. Her car wasn’t moving when he stood there. They were blocking her path, giving her lawful order to exit the vehicle. She’d already committed multiple felonies throughout the day, impeding etc. She made the choice to drive into him.
@loisromano@Timcast Delete your post you ignorant a$$hole. If he truly stepped aside, then you just made the point that she drove into him on purpose because she did hit him. God you people are dumb.
@sankrant @0hour1 Wrong moron. Look at the position of the tires the entire interaction until she starts spinning her tires. Tires are pointed slightly left and don’t turn till after. He was standing less than a foot away from the vehicle giving her orders and she didn’t obey, instead flooring it.
@EastEndJoe Go stand in front of a car with a hostile in the seat, not knowing their intentions or when they will act, then tell me how quickly you can respond. The incident from time she accelerated to hitting the agent was 0.79 second, lasted literally a split second. Get a fucking clue!