The positive future is not humans defeating AI or AI replacing humans.
Instead, it's humans using intelligence that never sleeps to build a civilization worthy of waking up to.
@PeterDiamandis Agree!! But… they won’t care. Many wont. Envy is in the heart of man and our civilization doesn’t condemn it.
The future is bright! But we have to steward it.
41% of young people thought Luigi Mangione murdering a healthcare CEO was at least somewhat acceptable.
Civilization is built on resolving conflict through words, not weapons.
Healthcare in America needs to be fixed.
But murder doesn't fix healthcare.
It breaks civilization.
"Normal people will build their own apps"
Yes, my friend who can't work his printer is going to:
1. Pay $200/mo for a Claude subscription.
2. Pay $99/yr for an iOS developer license.
3. Pay $100/yr to host a REST API.
4. Take 2 weeks off learning to vibe code ($2,000)
Or maybe he'd just pay $2 for one that already exists?
You did not cite a study. You commissioned an alibi, and you have run this play before.
You write the bills, your advisors write the studies, and the studies always confirm the bills.
The lead author of your new study, Alison Galvani, was an unpaid advisor to your own Senate office while it drafted the Medicare for All Act. She disclosed it herself in the 2020 version of this same paper.
In 2020 you called her work a major study from Yale, never mentioning she helped build the bill it graded. Now the sequel arrives as an unreviewed preprint whose own authors warn against relying on it.
The $1 trillion is decreed, not discovered. $377B comes from ordering drug prices down to foreign controls. $286B comes from assuming a federal monopoly runs leaner than the firms it abolishes, a claim Mises answered in Bureaucracy in 1944. Abolish market prices and you abolish economic calculation. A single payer can write any figure because no market remains to contradict it.
They’re all like this, BTW. Every single one is a disappointing nepo baby. DSA is if “I HATE YOU DAD” were a political party.
Commies are all scammers.
This is not an error, it is a fraud, and the man running it has run it for more than forty years.
The OECD counts any child below half of his own country's median income, which measures distance from the middle, not hunger, not want. Because America's median is the highest of any large nation, our "poverty" line sits above the typical family's entire income in Greece and Portugal on his own chart. If every American income doubled tomorrow, his number would not move. The senator knows this. The definition is printed on the source he cites, and he repeats the word poverty anyway, because poverty is the word that opens your wallet and inequality is not.
Now name the purpose. The number exists to incite envy, the oldest fuel of his creed. He needs you to resent your neighbor's earnings before you will hand him the power to seize them, so the guilt is manufactured first and the confiscation follows. And it is not his method alone. It is the whole movement's method this season, the wealth taxes, the government groceries, the billionaire chants, envy renamed compassion and sold as justice.
Here is the alarming part: it works. Our culture is so intellectually disarmed, by schools that teach neither economics nor logic, that millions read this chart and believe the freest economy in history starves its children. A nation that can no longer define poverty can no longer defend property, and that is the exact condition his agenda requires.
Rand named the root in The Age of Envy: hatred of the good for being the good. A man who spends four decades cultivating that hatred through a definition switch he has had every chance to correct is not a humanitarian with sloppy math. He is what his creed requires, and the word for him and those like him is evil.
It’s becoming clear that many people do not have a “line in the sand,” past which they will not go politically.
I am seeing people:
- supporting known terrorist groups.
- voting for people that do not want police helping you, nor jails to hold murderers or rapists.
- shrugging their shoulders at the rapes of over a quarter of a million women.
- accepting leaders who subscribe to marrying children and raping them (“consummation”).
- taking people’s private property.
The list goes on.
The fact that these people haven’t all said, “Nope. Stop here. I’m done. Not going there,” is proof they are mentally ill. I will not tolerate them if they appear to have zero personal moral code. It’s inhuman.
Focus on the things you are for, not the things you are against.
Many people spend large chunks of their day thinking about what they hate. They are always telling you about something they dislike: this food, that subject, this political party, that coworker.
You are more than your frustrations. Build your identity around what you love.
I'm officially done reading AI-generated code.
It's been two weeks since I looked at any of it.
I think the IDE is officially on its way to the graveyard. The job is no longer about "writing code," so we need new tools that better reflect this new reality.
While reviewing the code, I realized my only complaints were stylistic, and I wasn't finding any obvious bugs anymore.
The more code I generated, the harder it became to keep track of every line. I found that my time is better spent designing ways to verify that the overall system works than looking at the code.
State-of-the-art coding agents are better at writing code than I'd ever be, and I'm going to stop pretending otherwise.
I still think these coding agents can't go too far without an experienced human guiding them, but we're past the point where we need to check every line of code.
Democrats, via their lunatic positions, are destroying the United States. Republicans, via their apathy to stop these positions, are destroying the United States. If real American heroes do not step up and save the republic, it will be lost forever. Many people will not connect the dots until it is way too late.
For traditional artists like us who are using AI with our hand-drawn characters, it can take hours to get the model to work properly.
The problem with stylized 2D art like ours is that it doesn’t translate 1-to-1 into 3D. Noses may be off-center, eyes may be asymmetrical, and so on. And sometimes it just doesn't know what to do with unique features like this character's shoulder-mounted jetpack.
If you use the word "jetpack" in the prompt, it will add a traditional-looking jetpack.
You have to manually tweak the renders in Photoshop and go back and forth showing the AI what you want it to do. It’s a lot like sculpting.