1 in 10 Canadians waiting more than 14 hours in emergency rooms: report
3 hours agoNews
1 in 10 Canadians waiting more than 14 hours in emergency rooms: report
https://t.co/QKYGSCgkeI
@Rn_Psi@drsircus I don’t think he does research, is a methodologist or has training in clinical epidemiology & biostatistics to critically appraise the evidence.
I could be wrong & he can share his training in these areas.
@LiamSchubel What term do you use for your intervention?
Can you share that plus the objective outcome measure you use to assess the impact?
Safe travels.
@LiamSchubel you were going to share your process/protocol/intervention for treating vax-injured patients and the outcome assessment tool you use to objectively quantify their improvement.
1/ RFK Jr’s defenders often frame his vaccine interventions as “just asking questions.”
But over the past 18 months, the pattern has become more specific—and more troubling.
When vaccine-related evidence supports safety or efficacy, Kennedy’s HHS orbit has not merely debated it. It has blocked publication, demanded retraction, rewritten public-facing summaries, or reframed the evidence as inadequate.
The key question is not: “Are vaccine studies perfect?”
No serious scientist thinks they are.
The question is: why are the studies targeted for suppression, retraction, or public doubt so often the studies that show vaccines work, or that long-standing safety claims remain supported?
That is not scientific skepticism.
That is selective hostility toward evidence.
@LiamSchubel@LiberateNDs@DrNice2026@rencar130 Have a great day & I look forward to learning more about the intervention you are using on vax-injured patients and the objective tool you use to measure your outcome.
@LiamSchubel@LiberateNDs@DrNice2026@rencar130 Yep, I've given many lectures pointing out that #EBM isn't just about the best evidence (i.e. the literature).
Clinical judgement and patient preferences/values are also part of the definition. https://t.co/8ZnbM4p36S
@LiamSchubel@LiberateNDs@DrNice2026@rencar130 Super:
What evidence informs your care of vax-injured patients?
What specific care are you providing to these patients?
What objective tool are you using to measure the impact of your intervention?