Baron Pedro 🔺

Feudalist | NAP No. 1 Enemy
Rape Victim
🇵🇹🇻🇦
23

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

#RapeYourRapist

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

#AllStatistsAreRapists

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

> Spends months comparing AI to nuclear weapons and saying how dangerous their latest AI is
> Gets surprised when government restricts it
Are they stupid or is the marketing department run by monkeys?

[Polymarket @Polymarket]

JUST IN: Trump officials conclude talks with Anthropic without lifting Claude Fable 5 restrictions over ongoing jailbreak concerns.

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

@sigmahamster2 Interesting article but it has some serious flaws and blind spots, I left a comment on it going into detail.

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

@Always_CorrectG @Alyxhoppe I am not the one preventing people from using their body how they want and stealing from people. If you don't have arguments you can just say it, or you can just admit you want to violate peoples bodily autonomy, I would always respect the honesty

[Faz 🇵🇹 @sefazesfavor]

A seguinte foto esteve guardada pela minha família nos últimos 50 anos. Chegou a hora de eu a revelar ao mundo.

Salazar não caiu da cadeira, ele... ascendeu

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

Ok so you do want to violate people bodily autonomy by preventing them from doing what they want with their body, like me setting up a private school in my own home, and on top of that you want to do attempted murder by stealing from people, which is a direct unconsented attack at their self-preservation.

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

@Always_CorrectG @Alyxhoppe I agree with the secodn point.
People can do what they want with their bodies? Then you have no problems if i setup a private school and you are no longer pro abolishing private schools?

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

@Always_CorrectG @Alyxhoppe My point's are backed by history, and I think you are the one that does not know what bodily autonomy is when you are literally trying to use force to prevent people from using their body how they want.

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

And you think this is even a valid excuse to violate someone's bodily autonomy?

Do you think that thinking that something will lead to people having different opinions than you is a valid reason to violate someone's bodily autonomy?

Have you even consider the consequences of your own actions putting?

Why should you dictate that everyone goes to school and for how long?

Have you consider that public schooling does the opposite of what you think and not only leads people to have a worse of life long term it can even destroy people psychologically with over production of graduates?

Your actions will lead to death and crime in the lower classes because every second the kids had to spend studying instead of working and learning manual labour it was a second they didn't help their family put food in their table and had in some cases resorted to stealing which can lead to a life of crime.

Even in middle to higher class families it would ironically have exactly the same consequence you feared from private schooling, because there is no friction of graduation once they go to the work market they will feel wronged and will want to destroy the society they live in by blaming some group for their own failures, tha is what happened during the French Revolution, Soviet revolution and the Iranian revolution, journalist, lawyer and people with PhDs all dividing and destroying society because they felt wronged by the market.
And even today we can already see this repeating with people getting useless degrees going to work for MC Donald's and then blaming capitalism and the rich for them not having a better job with a diploma on fossil discovery.

Ironically your attempt at violating people's bodily autonomy to stop division will exactly lead to division, crime and a worst quality of life for everyone because you think you know what is better for every single human being.

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

Everyone is too retarded to do any choice on their own but also everyone is equal and they should have a right to vote and affect others life.
Just bring serfdom back bro

[Joakim 🌹🇳🇴🇪🇺 @joakial_]

@Mr__Comics No. Parents face enormous pressure to let their children be on social media because they don’t want their kids to stick out or feel excluded from their peers. Many parents are also addicted to social media themselves, which can make it even harder to set limits.

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

Every time a "communist" makes a post on X Marx weeps

[📕 @SwampCommunist]

Hes a professor, he was already petit-bourgeois without the tenants

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

@Always_CorrectG @Alyxhoppe I am just asking why you want to violate people's bodily autonomy, since you want to abolish things people do voluntarily. I am curious.

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

@Always_CorrectG @Alyxhoppe Why do you want to violate people's bodily autonomy and prevent them from doing what they want?

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

Wtf are you talking about? What foregin property? Why are you now bringing war into this? Why is it that I am defending a simple concept of hey i should be able to do what i want in my own terriotiry and you just keep beinging up the most random shit that has nothing to do with it?

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

Homesteading being necessary for farming is not the same as being part of farming, I need atoms to farm does not mean that physics and theory of gravity is part of farming. And noticed how you did a red hearing? You compeltely ignored the fact that i gave the example of a JOB!!! (BOOO!!!!) and you had to ignore it and specifically say for this one case you need homesteading to practice farming.

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

You did bring up serfdom by using the word serf, regardless you are still assuming that, feudalism does not say that everyone needs to be forced to labour and go to war it does not say anything about what is in teh contract, it only says about the LAND contract, and lets be honest if you are a serf you most likely do not own land to be part of the feudal system in the first place, and you know what? Even if we put all that aside and we look at that specific case If someone voluntarely chooses to make a contract with someone where they get house, food and in exchange they work and go to war if needed they are completely free to do that, its their choice.

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

Omg and this is why i have been telling you to read a history book, serfdom isn't feudalism, those are two very distinct things historians keep nailing down, serfdoom was a economic system that formed during mediaval times due to the material conditions of the time. And again you are assuming those things that have nothing to do with feudalism you keep attracking straws

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

What difference? You keep making assertions without no profe, there is only a court if I decide to make one for my own territory, i can have a 10 meters farm and make a court council to judge each corn picked up the same way i can have 10k territory and make a court to judge the peoples that rent my terretory. The problem is that you genuinely cannot conceptualize a person having more than 50 meters of land, seriously if you stop thinking for one second of a king as a state and you start thinking of a king as guy with land (which is what it was historically) everything will click into place, its that simple.
Just put yourself in the chose of a guy with land the size of a luxemburg, waht woudl you do? A person is at a border and asking for work what would you do? Someone complains there is crime what would you do? There is conflict over a stolen cow what would you do? Its not hard to understand but you genuinely cannot conceptualize something as simple as a guy having a lot of land.

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

You call it public law i call it my land's law, you are just trying to phrase it in ways to make it sound coercive and like a state when in reality you are talking about a guy stipulating what can and cant be done in his own territoriy. again you dont know what feudalism is, you don't know the definition, you don't know what the historical version even was. Accept the facts.

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

@thomasprvtrain @snakesofliberty You are again assuming your own conclusion of I stole everything instead of accepting the reality that there is nothing stopping me from buying land infinitely. Can you argue without strawmanning?

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

@thomasprvtrain @snakesofliberty It's not compulsion because it's my land, morality does not care about your personal case, if you don't like my rules you can leave. No one has the right to violate me and my property and there is no limit to my property.

[Baron Pedro 🔺 @thetechnocrat0]

There is no monopoly of compulsion, there is only a logical conclusion to ancap thinking that given the given facts of property and free trade is above all then there is no limit to territorial accumulation that a single person can do through volutary exchange. Sadly many ancaps are scared of this realization but the reality is that feudalism is possible and I would even say inevitable given the destruction of all states, sorry commie but I can do whatever i want in my own land wether its 50m of land or 10k kilometers