@SalusFC_info@segmentata@mxdric But what proportion are actually watching the matches?
That's like saying India should have better footballing talent than France because they've a bigger population.
@mxdric By catering to Europe, you're also catering to larger audiences in Africa, and to a lesser extent the Middle East too.
My knowledge of logistics is limited, but Scotland v Haiti could have been a 1pm kickoff in New York or Toronto? (If this doesn't make sense lemme know)
@mxdric By catering to Europe, you're also catering to larger audiences in Africa, and to a lesser extent the Middle East too.
My knowledge of logistics is limited, but Scotland v Haiti could have been a 1pm kickoff in New York or Toronto? (If this doesn't make sense lemme know)
@mxdric I think that's where I disagree. Purely because I'd imagine that the largest audience watching the World Cup on TV will be in Europe, not in the Americas or Asia. Hence it makes sense to cater to that where appropriate.
Also, cool you're based in Europe too.
@jerryagar1010 Football (soccer as you call it) is a low scoring game, it'd take much longer to score a 'point' (goal) than in other sports.
Though they had a rule like this until a few decades back, look up 'golden goal'.
@ubiquitousnewt I'm liking this so far.
I've a question, for the teams that make it to the latter stages (or if the same teams play against each other twice). Will you do another analysis of their population/IQ?
@TheSnowDreamer Nice. Was waiting for the green flag from you, and from Accuweather too.
Had seen this on the IPhone weather app yesterday, but I don’t treat it with too much weight.