Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babiš’s answer to Sky’s question says it all:
"Will you support Britain rejoining the EU?"
"Yes, of course. We need more money."
29 Muslim men have been convicted of raping a single 13 year old girl in West Yorkshire
29 Men on one little girl
These people are barbarians, savages, vile.
How many more little girls need to suffer before we admit these people don't belong in our country?
DEPORT THEM ALL
The war will cost 155 billion euros next year. And we need at least 70 billion euros more from you – for defense, for weapons, and for our resilience. This is a realistic amount. And I ask you to find this support. It will help us hold Russia back.
There are some very simple facts. We stop most Russian assaults on the front line thanks to drones. We cut Russian supply lines with these technologies. And our drones are helping to weaken Russia’s economy.
Right now, we could produce two or three times more drones – depending on the type. But we simply don’t have enough money for that. It’s true. Just imagine if we could put two or three times more pressure on Russia than we do today.
From an address to the participants of the European Council meeting. (4/5)
Young people don’t leave NI because salaries aren’t as good here when they leave Uni and try and find work.
They leave because they don’t want to live and work in a hate filled state.
Stephanie Chase: "The march that the Drumcree Orangemen are really concerned about is the one the north of Ireland is taking forward at a pace they can’t keep up with. It is a march that is inclusive, respectful, and welcomes everyone."
Ireland is sending hundreds of millions to the Ukrainian crime syndicate, and literally billions to "provide" for fake Ukrainian "Refugees" (who travel home to see family and have dental work done)
Meanwhile, elderly Irish taxpayers, who built the country?
Disgusting.
A Ukrainian military officer is on trial in Germany for the terrorist attack on the Nord-stream pipeline. This attack had the gravest environmental, energy and economic consequences. His defence is that he was only obeying orders from his government. Your intelligence services and their media lied to you that Russia itself committed this crime. Who will be held accountable for this?
This man is spot on.
A political establishment that refuses to accept a democratic outcome and is hell-bent on overturning it.
They preach democracy when they win and undermine it when they lose.
Their hypocrisy couldn’t be more blatant.
Just seen the footage from that Arriva bus stop in the UK. Immigrants on the bus fighting with knives, full-on chaotic scrap, innocent people scattering to avoid being hurt or drawn into the violence.
This isn’t some one-off anymore. Same story keeps cropping up on public transport, fights, knives, people not feeling safe just trying to get home. Drivers are dealing with it constantly.
And they still want us to chant “diversity is our strength.” Give me a break!!
Does anybody seriously believe that? When you’re watching this stuff play out at bus stops and on the buses themselves?
This is Modern Britain in 2026, that’s the sad reality we are now in.
A Ukrainian military officer is on trial in Germany for the terrorist attack on the Nord-stream pipeline. This attack had the gravest environmental, energy and economic consequences. His defence is that he was only obeying orders from his government. Your intelligence services and their media lied to you that Russia itself committed this crime. Who will be held accountable for this?
Where is Americans’ money going?
The wife of the head of Ukraine’s State Audit Service is throwing money around at a party.
His salary is $900 a month.
But Zelensky and his gang live off what was looted from the US.
To stop the war in Ukraine, an AUDIT is needed! The world must know the truth about the corrupt official Zelensky.
All hope of Ukrainians is on Americans.
@KateNicholl@CllrMichaelLong Bring back National Service.
Not for the military, that should be a choice.
Bring it back for this sort of work and these ridiculous clips will stop being made.
Someone Wanted Me To Expose Piers Morgan:
Let's 1st Understand One Thing
You need to understand what Piers Morgan actually is before you understand what he does. He is not a journalist. He is not an interviewer. He is not even a personality in the way the public understands personality. He is a placement agent for narrative laundering. His entire career is a single assignment: to sit in the most visible chair available and cleanse dirty assets with the appearance of scrutiny.
So What Exactly Is His Function?
His tactic is simple, and it works because the audience has been trained to mistake volume for courage. He screams at people. He interrupts. He postures as the indefatigable truth-seeker who asks the "tough questions." But the spectacle is a magic trick. The real questions never get asked. The screaming is the cover for the script. The confrontation is the alibi.
Nobody gets grilled on a Piers Morgan show unless the grilling serves the network's interests. And when a protected asset like Zelenskyy sits down, the "tough questions" are written by the same people who wrote Zelenskyy's talking points.
Why?
Because Piers Morgan has been a controlled asset for decades. His career is a latticework of editor positions at major tabloids, television networks, and media properties, each one owned by the exact financial class he claims to oppose. You do not get handed the editorship of an international tabloid at 29 years old because of talent alone. You get it because you are known to be dependable. You will run the stories you are told to run. You will kill the stories you are told to kill. And you will do it with such performative bluster that nobody notices the pattern.
Morgan's recent defense of Zelenskyy is not an act of conscience. It is a scheduled perception operation, executed with all the subtlety of a knee on a neck. The rollout is coordinated interviews highlighting Zelenskyy's "feelings of betrayal," his "emotional pain" over American politics, his "lonely fight against corruption." None of it is journalism. It's an image reconstruction campaign.
Here's The Tell:
The framework is always emotional, never forensic. A real interviewer following the money would ask about the DTRA documents. About the biolab records. About the former Ukrainian prosecutor who was fired for investigating corruption in the energy sector. About the cargo manifests moving through Odesa. About the offshore accounts and shell companies linked to the political class in Kyiv. About the disappearance of billions in Western "aid" into private hands.
A real journalist would ask about the adrenochrome logistics, the trafficking corridors, the organ brokerage networks that moved through Ukrainian territory for years.
Piers Morgan asks none of it. Instead, he asks about feelings. He asks about betrayal. He lets Zelenskyy weep on camera or perform the appearance of it because emotional theater is the smoke screen. The audience responds to the crying, not the cargo.
The performative vulnerability distracts from the forensic reality. And Piers knows exactly what he's doing. He has spent thirty years learning which emotional buttons to push to keep a conversation from ever becoming dangerous.
What did the London media do during the Epstein disclosures?
They ran the American imports and added nothing. Zero investigative energy on the British side of the network. Zero follow-up on the London banking. Zero on the properties, the tax structures, the charity fronts, the art transactions. The British press Morgan's press treated Epstein as a foreign story that happened to have a British prince attached. That omission is not an accident. It's an editorial decision made by people who knew the trail would lead home.
Morgan's silence on the British side of the Epstein network is louder than any interruption he's ever performed on camera. He knows where the bodies are buried metaphorically, and in at least one case, with a specificity that would make the hair on your neck stand up. The London blackmail economy was built on exactly this kind of shared knowledge: everyone holds everyone's video, so nobody talks.
We will dig more into him later.
@piersmorgan