The apex central government institute for mental health and neurosciences - National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS) in India is openly promoting Homeopathy for psychiatric illness and endorsing the Homeopathic Psychiatric Association.
I'm not sure who has castrated and put on gun point, the whole of NIMHANS Mental Health Education Department...because any faculty of psychiatry would thoroughly oppose this kind of nonsense. Or has the faculty in NIMHANS misplaced their guts and lost their spine?
Don't go to NIMHANS for your mental health treatment. They might give you alcohol and sugar balls and call it a day.
This is baby Samuel. Born alive after an abortion at 16 weeks, he sucked his thumb in the Butterfly Room at a QLD hospital. He lived for over 30 minutes. He was perfectly healthy prior to his abortion. Babies who survive their abortion have no legislative right to equal treatment and care under QLD law. He was left to die. No-one picked him up, wrapped him or gave him any medical care to alleviate his pain and suffering. This photo was passed onto me by a hospital worker who was called to look at him by others who were watching him as he sucked his thumb after his abortion. Already it is being censored online and pro-abortion activists are seeking to identify the brave whistleblower who risked their career to give us this photo.
🛑 SHARE this image. The world needs to see his face.
🔥 JOIN US as we stand for baby Samuel and all QLD babies next Monday 9 February / 5.30-6.30PM / 2A George St, outside QLD Parliament
tl;dr: a really whiny way to get clicks and advertise for NXR Studios.
The “everybody is so mean to me” act is getting kind of old.
Doug “mocked you relentlessly.” Are you serious, Joel?
Do you remember the whole “women are retarded” thing? The “name your favorite pie” thing? The “mock Owen Strachan off Twitter” thing? The “fake and gay” thing?
Wow.
You haven’t responded to anything that Doug actually said; you’ve only asserted that he is mean. But he actually made arguments in that post – arguments which were quite good – arguments which you cannot simply dismiss, and anyone who is paying attention will recognize that that is what you’re trying to do here.
If you’re going to be an edgelord, then having these little meltdowns when people call you on the unacceptable things that you say is rather disingenuous. Pretending like you were shocked by criticism from people on the right when you’ve been receiving criticism from people on the right consistently for years now is pretty silly.
I know you like to dismiss Doug Wilson and James White as boomers. Conveniently, you also dismiss criticism from women because – well, it comes from women. You dismiss criticism from men at your age or even younger – for example, a blue-collar tradesman like myself – because such men are white knights, or are fake and gay.
The consistent pattern is that no matter how anybody presents criticism to you, they are the problem.
I don’t think you’re stupid, Joel. But that only makes the situation worse.
And for the record, I think that Doug Wilson should own more of the NXR fallout than he does. I think sometimes it really is just taking his logic a dozen steps further. But he is still right to rebuke it where it has gotten now.
Finally, regarding the caveat that you insist that you have given. That is weak tea, and you should know it.
You consistently say all manner of ill-defined, inflammatory, and outrageous things, including things that are completely indefensible. Then, consistently, a week or two later, you give a thoughtful post that flushes it out in detail with caveats in a way that is technically OK (if you squint).
Those of us with eyes can see what direction this is headed.
If you were just arguing that normally interracial marriage isn’t what happens, that usually cultures preserve themselves, and that’s completely OK… We would not be having this conversation. We would all agree.
But that is not what you are arguing. It’s the Bailey, but you insist on making regular sorties into the Motte.
Last question, and I really hope you will answer this. You say that it is not a sin to want your grandchildren to look like you. Agreed.
My question for you is simply this – are you stating that this is simply preference? Would it be OK for someone to think it would be cool to have a mulatto grandchild? Is this in the same category as hoping for a grandbaby with freckles or blonde hair, or thinking it would be cool to have twins?
Really hoping for an answer on this, because the whole “it’s technically OK, but it’s really not recommended” thing is how cults structure their legalisms all the time.
If you’re going to wear the title of Christian Pastor, then when you go around proclaiming what is ideal and what is recommended you need to recognize that a bunch of young men watching are hearing moral categories. And you know this, because you’re presenting moral categories.
“Not technically a sin” is not the same thing as “it’s totally fine if that’s what God leads you to.” You’re putting theological pressure against interracial marriage, no matter how many caveats you say to the contrary, and you should be smart enough to recognize that.
And just own it.
Of all the solid points Doug Wilson brought up in his response to Joel Webbon, Joel made an entire video exclusively whining about Doug calling him stupid.
He really doesn't want to be seen as Low IQ. The cope is off the charts.
I’m sorry, if “sinning in the right direction” doesn’t get super laughed at and meme’d into the group chat history, I cannot take your “masculine men make fun of each other” lines seriously.
@Lexy_Sauve Your statements above and pictured below are political commentary. What you are describing in the post is simple obedience to God which at times can also be active resistance to tyranny. Both have their place.