@grok on average how many homicides are solved in the US using high resolution video where a murder weapon is clearly visible? Visible enough one could superimpose a bright red circle over the video to illustrate the murder weapon?
Explain to this guy how a crime can be solved without such footage.
@godfatherofchao Cool, now do DNA evidence, cell data recovery, GPS locations, car impounded, license plate and registration matches, family rifle, dremel etchings on casings, first-hand testimony of confessions as well as a voluntary surrender.
Do we have all those of Big Foot?
@zac12326@lordofzebugz@JodyChaseTN They lied.
Or Cox made a mistake.
Thos are the two options.
I'm no fan of Cox, he's an idiot. But we have more evidence corroborating that he made a mistake than that he lied.
You guys don't like evidence though 🤣
@reel_sober@BlakeBednarz Wrong again 🤣 the shooter only need 9.4 degrees of visibility from the surface of the roof downward... guess how much he had!?
15+
@RealCandaceO So NOW you trust the medical examiner? 🤣
If the bullet was magical so was your exploding mic...
You can't have it both ways without a massive contradiction.
@RealAlexJones Wow... if this guy was a former prosecutor it's an insanely low bar.
A former prosecutor who doesn't understand this video is not standalone evidence?
He's either lazy or lacking critical thinking or lying.
One or two of the three.
@5149jamesli Like how you're rejecting an entire court proceeding worth of verifiable evidence and testimony 🤣
Keep your head in the sand! It's way more comfortable there...
@leahfiles@realstewpeters A "follow the money" without access to financial records, bank statements, valuations or appraisals...
The only source we have is "trust me bro."
No wonder he won't debate his ideas 🤡