@effoff1988 Plus, he "booked" himself an executive producer role on that film. Idk if that is comparable to other people hiring him. Plus, we know how his fans feel about executive producers having any creative imput on films. Or is it allowed when it isn't a woman they were told to hate?
@LeaveHeardAlone I did find it really odd that she chose Megyn Kelly for her outlet considering her views not being provictim and add in that she is Freedman's puppet and certain Baldoni CCs that we know how connections to Freedman also seemed ready with their take the moment it dropped
@KassidyOC The only opposing opinion (which is actually more a fact than opinion) I gave was that yall dont cover the smear sites. The last sentence explained why I think it wouldn't be worth your time to cover them. You gave more stamina than me. Im out.Have the last word & have a nice day
@KassidyOC Did I say they can't post it? No. I just gave correct info that it isn't correct to say yall have the deets about the smear sites. Had they actually said yall had the deets about the Lively/Baldoni case if that is actually what they meant, I would have scrolled past
@RealPamster And you also know that wasnt true that she took the film without approval?π It was already obvious it was a way to make the audience feel excited about it. But there are also messages talking about taking it to Book Bonanza π
@RealPamster And my apologies for replying to this after saying not to reply to me about non smear site stuff. It was too funny to hear people still believe that she took the film to Book Bonanza illegally lol
@RealPamster If you aren't going to talk about this post by THR please stop responding to me
That was the topic here. Not a rehash of a case I wasn't talking about
@Lemonlimefizzez And you won't see me in comment sections of an article about him saying dont listen to people talking about his dirty deeds like some Baldoni supporters are doing here
@KassidyOC Yes. I mentioned his name only to say yall dont dig into the people Baldoni hired (which the video is about.) And then said your fans dont want to hear about it so why would yall focus on it. Nothing in my comment talked about your coverage of the Lively/Baldoni case...
@Resigned2HRC How is making a video about the smear websites that aren't fake or misinformation "smearing Baldoni"? He is only mentioned to say it was discovery in this case that exposed this stuff, which is a fact. No one said Baldoni is making these smear websites π
@RealPamster@BlakeLivelyLies@THR@KassidyOC@LethalLauren904@Linet___K Not new to the case. Not a bot either. And nothing you said changes what my comment was. The people tagged in the original comment are not the place to go for learning about the tactics of Freedman, Nathan & Wallace. Or that their fans want to hear about it. They dont
@KassidyOC@BlakeLivelyLies@THR@LethalLauren904@Linet___K I get it is discovery found in that case but again, that was not a focus of anyone on Baldoni's side's content. I'm not saying it had to be. But this comment I replied to said this report was bogus and that yall are the place to get the info on this which was incorrect
@KassidyOC@BlakeLivelyLies@THR@LethalLauren904@Linet___K Why is everyone acting like this THR video is about the Lively/Baldoni case. It is about the websites & actions of the "dream team", not Baldoni. And yall are not the best place for that information or any information about it honestly.
@BlakeLivelyLies@THR@KassidyOC@LethalLauren904@Linet___K No they dont. They haven't been digging into the actions of the people Baldoni hired. Of course they wouldn't though. Why would they want to expose the people WP's hired. Their fans dont want to hear anything unless it involves Blake being a "mean girl" or "bully"
@Resigned2HRC@THR Did you even watch the video? It was talking about how the discovery in that case and the Jones case uncovered the disgusting things Freedman, Nathan, and Wallace have been up to. You can think Justin didn't do anything wrong and still condemn the acts of these fd up people