My deep rooted hope is that my homeland becomes the 51st state of the union governed by an unbastardized Constitution of the United States of America.
A watershed in the ordering of a new world
that's legitimately of, by, and for the people.
Eye on the prize.
@realChrisBrunet@jakeshieldsajj Chris. I highly suggest that you swallow your pride and walk this one back. Jake gave you an honorable offer that also gives him an out for the harm he'll do you if you don't accept the offer. So take the offer, not the bait. Or walk your nonsense back completely.
@Dirtworks49 @JosephRDiehl @RedpillDrifter You're all circling around having a good thought. Redpill... where's the other half of the sigil? These things require a certain amount of accuracy. I'd suggest looking at the coordinates then looking up at the stars, unless you're intentionally pointing away from understanding.
@mrvaldez__ Let me clarify. I saw a tweet from Blaise and was wondering what the full context is, and thought you might know because of the prompt. I'm curious because Joseph/Potiphar has been an active embodiment in the anti-'witchcraft masquerading as Christ's church' effort. Odd timing.
God bless my fellow Americans.
Maybe time for the JFK files?
Maybe Mount Zion isn't for these Zionists?
Maybe...
the sun goes dark and whoever asks the Lord to save them gets saved because the Lord said
there will be deliverance on Mount Zion
and in Jerusalem?
@TheEmmapreneur It looks like a good note to me. Comments on a surface level misunderstanding of the ritual magic in the article title itself, which your tweet quotes. And the links are very good. "for an old ritual being done with a new aspect"
@Kittykrysta9 @Samaszewski @Dialectiks You seem to be confusing a confession of romantic love and a declaration of intent to make romantic commitment. A marriage proposal is an offer to commit and is the domain of a man because normal romantic love leads to babies, and his commitment to them/the mother is a choice.
Billy Carson is attempting to sue me. @4biddnKnowledge I will agree to all the terms and conditions of the cease and desist letter that you have sent me if you agree to run it back, sit down with me in person, and have another discussion. This is my formal response.
@mflixx1@dpcrr@blessedinvamom@DrMichaelLBrown Thanks for sharing this post. Glad @RonSCantor saw through it.
The way Michael's trying to characterize what he did is as dishonest (and almost as funny) as Falwell Jr saying he wasn't involved in his wife's affair because he was sitting in the cuck chair.
Same PR consultant?
@mflixx1@DrMichaelLBrown 100% pure BS and the amount of people he's been able to con is shocking.
Wild to watch him try to represent that acting like a Daddy Dom with a non-consenting woman was 'being a godly father figure' on the merit of her not fully giving into his sexual advance.
@mflixx1@dpcrr@blessedinvamom@DrMichaelLBrown The gymnastics to think he'd do something like that without a sexual motivation is absurd. It's a PR move to get people hung on the idea of "No sex! No affair! Therefore not sexual" I don't care if was an affair. I care that he's lying with this "not in any way sexual" bullshit.
@DrMichaelLBrown Another thing @DrMichaelLBrown... the evil of misrepresenting the burden of your "foolish and irresponsible" actions as if "they weren't sexual because they didn't get you any sex" is that you're asking your brothers and sisters to carry a lie instead of the actual burden.
Dear @DrMichaelLBrown.
Gentle restoration requires honesty from one that requires restoration. Here's how that works:
If you think "slander" is evil and sinful, I suggest you be honest so you quit leading the little ones to sin.
Until then I'll keep teasing you, brother.
Hey @DrMichaelLBrown.
Please explain how a pastor can do "foolish and irresponsible" things with a secretary half his age that involve her ass and his lap that make her uncomfortable, while making those actions totally non-sexual?
We'd all like to learn this one, bud.
@dpcrr@blessedinvamom@DrMichaelLBrown Those are the "foolish and irresponsible" actions he's talking about. The "aspects of [his] interactions with her" that were "foolish" and "totally non-sexual in every way." So yes, he did literally say that.
I just think he should be honest about the sexual impulse behind it.