@anamika13@JaipurDialogues Many women who came from, or wrote about, such households exposed the control and injustice women suffered. Read Indira Goswami, Lalithambika Antharjanam, Sudha Murty and Pandita Ramabai. Their works reveal the gap between worshipping feminine power and respecting real women.
@anamika13@JaipurDialogues You can still see this patriarchy in some old orthodox Brahmin households. Women may be celebrated as divine feminine power in scriptures, yet in reality many were confined within four walls and denied even the freedom to speak before the men of the family.
@anamika13@JaipurDialogues What does Vāc Āmbhṛṇī prove here? Yes, it speaks of feminine cosmic power, but it is Śruti, not a social rulebook. When it came to women’s actual rights and duties, Smṛtis, Dharmaśāstras/Sūtras imposed restrictions. So your claim is misleading.
@kapoorashish87@JaipurDialogues Lol.. you’re right.. you clearly know and follow your religion very well. Your blind defensiveness, hatred, arrogance, and complete refusal to think critically are proving it better than any scripture ever could.
@JaipurDialogues विशीलः कामवृत्तो वा गुणैर्वा परिवर्जितः ।
उपचार्यः स्त्रिया साध्व्या सततं देववत् पतिः ॥ ५.१५४ ॥
English meaning: Even if the husband is immoral, governed by his desires or devoid of good qualities, he should always be attended to,served or honoured like a god by a virtuous wife.
@JaipurDialogues English translation:
Whether she is a girl, a young woman or an elderly woman, a woman should not perform any act independently, even within her own home.
@JaipurDialogues You fool hindu vaadis you don't even know what is said in Brahminical texts. I can share some lines with you.
Part 1:
Manusmṛti:
बालया वा युवत्या वा वृद्धया वाऽपि योषिता ।
न स्वातन्त्र्येण कर्तव्यं किं चित् कार्यं गृहेष्वपि ॥ ५.१४७ ॥
@IndiaToday@SauravDassss@PreetiChoudhry And where were these same media outlets when members of the ruling party used abusive language or made unethical claims? The inconsistency is hard to ignore.
@IndiaToday@SauravDassss@PreetiChoudhry Why are some media outlets deviating from the actual issues? Instead of focusing on matters that truly affect people, they seem to be chasing the narratives that certain IT cells are pushing.
@theliverdoc More detailed study: https://t.co/GAIDmFkgnb
Also you have misinterpreted Camacho-Cardenosa.
More accurate conclusion: There was no clear advantage for the primary visceral-fat endpoint, but there were differences in weight and some secondary metabolic outcomes.
🚨URGENT STATEMENT🚨
The interim order passed by the Supreme Court of India in the batch of PILs related to the CJP protest must ring alarm bells across the country. In particular, Direction No. 4, which permits governments to proceed with existing FIRs and carry out investigations, raises extremely serious concerns.
This direction stands in direct contradiction to the solemn assurance and guarantee extended by the Government of India to the youth of this nation on 25 July 2026, namely, that the FIRs would be withdrawn and that no protester would be directly or indirectly targeted for participating in the peaceful movement.
It was on the strength of that solemn assurance, and in complete good faith, that the Cockroach Janta Party called off its nationwide protest.
We now have a credible apprehension that the Government of India and BJP-ruled states may seek to use and weaponise this order of the Bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant to continue FIRs against individual protesters and subject them to great harassment. This was precisely our concern from day one: that courts could be used, directly or indirectly, to achieve political ends by targeting peaceful dissent.
Equally troubling is the fact that the interim order was not opposed by the government's lawyers, despite the Central Government being fully aware that talks/assurances with the CJP had continued until as recently as late last night and that a solemn agreement had already been arrived at on 25 July.
The court's uninformed order is therefore wholly unacceptable.
A solemn public assurance given to thousands of young students and protesters cannot be diluted, undermined, or rendered meaningless through subsequent legal developments, in a surreptitious manner. It only results in breach of public trust.
In any event, nothing in the interim order prevents the Government of India or the concerned BJP/NDA ruled State Governments from withdrawing the FIRs or deciding not to proceed against peaceful protesters, like done by Bihar and Assam governments. The power to withdraw or not pursue such cases continues to rest with the executive. The court has not mandated that governments must definitely continue with the FIRs. That would be a deliberate misreading. The Government must not invoke the Court’s order as a justification for reneging on the commitment it made on 25 July.
We therefore demand that the Government of India and the concerned BJP/NDA State Governments immediately place the terms of this solemn assurance before the Supreme Court in the pending proceedings so that there is complete transparency regarding the commitments already made to the youth of this country and so that the court can withdraw and make an informed order in the future.
The youth of India entered into this understanding in good faith. That good faith must not be betrayed. Institutions of constitutional importance must never be politicised and weaponised to not honour the guarantees.
The deadline for the Government of India to honour its guarantees expires today. We once again call upon it to fulfil every commitment it made: withdraw the FIRs, ensure that no protester is subjected to future punitive action, and honour both the letter and the spirit of the assurance that brought an end to the protest.
Failing this, and as previously declared, the Cockroach Janta Party will have no option but to resume its nationwide protest to protect the students and young protesters who stood up not for themselves alone, but for the future of this nation. A government that breaks its word cannot expect the youth to remain silent. If the guarantees are dishonoured, the streets of India will once again become the voice of its young.
VIDEO | Delhi: After meeting Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi, AISA president Neha Bora says, “I think the discussion we had today with Rahul Gandhi sir was most fruitful. Discussions like these, about the country's education system, hardly ever take place. There is no meaningful discussion on education. There is no discussion on how the entire education system has been taken over in such a way that the education, learning, and curiosity of young, promising minds are being destroyed. We had a wonderful discussion on this issue. Another concern that we shared with sir was that there was a call for a Bihar Bandh today. Before the bandh, yesterday, a large number of student activists were arrested by the Bihar Police…The three demands that sir has put forward here truly represent the demands of the youth and students of this country."
She added, "There can be no step back on the demand for Dharmendra Pradhan's resignation. No change of ministry will be acceptable. No bill against paper leaks is going to satisfy the demand that Dharmendra Pradhan must resign. There must also be accountability for the violence that took place on the 20th. The Commissioner of Police and the Home Minister must also be held accountable. There can be no compromise or adjustment on this issue.”
(Full video available on PTI Videos - https://t.co/bIyFWTeOLF)
''अब ये आंदोलन हिसाब लेने पर उतर आया है.''
दिल्ली के जंतर मंतर पर 23 दिन तक भूख हड़ताल पर रहीं आइसा लीडर नेहा ने बीबीसी से बात की है. देखिए ये पूरी बातचीत.
रिपोर्टर: सुमेधा पाल
शूट एडिट: रुबाइयत बिश्वास