He should have buckets of piss dumped on him for the rest of his days. That genocidal piece of shit had no problem exterminating elderly cancer patients in Gaza. Let him rot on earth and in hell
The most disturbing thing about the past few days is discovering just how many people share the opinion:
"Well, if she consented to a threesome with Russell Brand, she deserved to be anally raped by him a few days later."
If you think Russell Brand was targeted because he was speaking up against "the establishment" then someone needs to cut your sandwiches into circles for you so that you don't hurt yourself on the corners.
So you’re online defending a convicted rapist without even a cursory glance at the evidence against him and you’re upset I’m calling you names?
And you’re asking the most cliched questions (why come forward now?) that have been answered thousands of times if you pay even a tiny bit of attention to the widespread abuse of women that is constantly occurring and the debate around it.
Going online to defend a convicted rapist with a long, public history of misogyny and sexual exploitation who does not know or care who you are is a ludicrous way to spend your precious finite time alive on this beautiful planet
@johnsteppling@Capellarec ok so a) what forensic evidence will likely survive 22 years? Come the fuck on. And b) as a consequence you’re saying rapists should be prosecuted EVEN LESS than they are, since that sets a higher bar than is established already in court and prosecutions are less than 1%
@RafayAhmedfy6c So has Trump and he’s currently president so put your big boy thinking cap on and try again — things can coexist. Tate was the poster child for the system, whether he has the MSM on side or not does not matter.
Saying Russell Brand or Andrew Tate posed a threat to the establishment is like saying Joe Rogan or Donald Trump pose threats the establishment — my brother in Christ they *are* the establishment
I’ve reported rape twice to the Met Police, both times NFA’d (No Further Action), both times appealed, gave my phone in for evidence both times, they both refused to give their phones, gave DNA evidence in one, it wasn’t even touched, one Detective Inspector told me:
Jail isn’t really a deterrent for anything as far as I’m aware, it’s that convicted rapists don’t have the chance to rape any more women when they’re locked up. And yes those victims matter more to me than the people who abuse them, not something I’d apologise for.
Tell me, since you’re unable to ‘square’ the fact I want woman protected better from rapists like Brand with the fact I ‘claim to advocate for justice’ — what is the justice you would mete out in this situation? Would you have Brand walk free? Is that your justice?
@Jamesmealey10 I’m no fan of prisons, but yes a high profile rapist being jailed means victims are more likely to come forward in all walks of life, in turn meaning there is a chance of fewer rapes — so a victory, yes, clearly.
You’re part of the reason rapists are so unprosecuted — fighting online to defend a man who is widely known to be a sexual predator. I head from others on the comedy circuit *years ago* that this was common knowledge, and this trial highlighted that fact. Disgusting behaviour to defend this.
No, what is ridiculous is that you defend this:
"Then, without warning, Brand flipped her over and anally raped her so violently that she struggled to breathe. She begged him to stop but he refused, telling her: “I want you to feel my come.”
He later chastised her for getting blood on his sheets and ordered her to clean up the mess before casually turning on the TV and instructing an assistant to escort her out.
Two dozen witnesses gave evidence in support of the woman’s account."
@asantekotoko4 I don’t think I’ve ever said the UK justice system is ‘two tier’ — but I do criticise it heavily. That doesn’t mean it cannot get anything right, of course. These things can coexist.