@unusual_whales That’s comical since most hotels in China have a large selection of seemingly pirated American movies on set top boxes. If you have issues with the box they switch it out and you have a new set of movies to choose from.
@Bluedeerc@JoegGooden1 Spreads book the same as any other contract. Each contract in the spread will still show up with a sell at that time. There was a sell of 5 contracts of 4800 Put at the same 3/26 9:00AM making it even more plausible those were a spread trade.
@Bluedeerc@JoegGooden1 1st my complaint was about the non-spread long. Clearly in the screenshot it was a spread. If it was purchased at all it had to happen at 9:00 AM on March 26th.
REGARDLESS of this, the call was amazing and is working out wonderfully. Sorry to detract from it.
@Bluedeerc@JoegGooden1 What’s the wager? Because there are two issues. 1) did they trade without a spread -No screenshot shows they had the spread opened.
2) did they purchase 5000P contracts at 2.80 - No because there wasn’t any trades at 2.80
@Bluedeerc At the bottom of the picture you posted it shows related trades and you can see the top part of other side of the spread: SPX (SPXW) APR 17 ‘25 4800 PUT then in RED meaning loss 25,1xx. This means they opened the same 5000/4800 spread not straight long.
@JoeyF07@TheFigen_ No, your answer requires multiplying the inside of the parenthesis by 6 then dividing it by 2. You have to fully resolve the parenthesis which requires multiplying contents by 2 before proceeding further. Answer is 1.
@TheFigen_ You have to completely resolve the parenthesis first (not just add what is inside). This requires the multiplication of what is inside the parenthesis by 2 before you can divide that into 6. Answer is 1.
Can’t convert the parenthesis into a multiplication sign to change order.
@OldManLefty1 At least your honest that MSNBC is nothing more than a shrill for the DNC. Perhaps a better use of airtime would be reporting / debating actual news.
@SenWarren Please explain the “one” person from your side of the fence that has done ANYTHING to increase the efficiency of the federal gov’t or reduce gov’t waste.
@VigilantFox So Allan's upset that his "information" didn't gain better traction than Elon Musk's? This is why political hacks make bad pollsters. Perhaps he should eliminate his bias and just reread his keys - seems pretty straightforward that Kamala would lose based off the keys.