ticky

hoping commonsense and decency are out there

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

“3 men a day” declaring themselves legally a woman may sound like insignificant numbers to some, but it’s not. Yes, it’s 1000 a year, 10,000 in 10 years, etc.

But that’s not even the worst part. It’s also millions of people unwillingly involved in a lie, having to accept a legal lie under fear of punishment while giving up their own rights. And this is why “transgenderism” has so much push back, and why it is not analogous with gay rights despite the forced teaming.

See, gay rights didn’t take anything away from anyone else (nor did any other civil rights based on race, sex or disability). Civil rights were always about ensuring a forgotten/ignored/genuinely marginalized demographic got the same rights already afforded to the majority.

But that isn’t what is happening here with “trans rights”.

Because, the majority isn’t changing the sex marker on their birth certificate & using that to force other people to indulge an obvious lie to their own detriment. It’s just simply not something that happens. The reality of the situation is “trans rights” are giving a demographic of people *privileges* that literally no one else has.

It should always be noted that it’s not a human right if it takes away rights from anyone else, by definition. This is why previous civil rights movements were successful: no one’s actual rights were destroyed by allowing women to vote, races to mix, gay people to marry, etc. Hence, all the rights demanded were human rights by their nature and marginalized groups were simply finally given rights they should have always had.

But it’s never been a right, for example, for a man to be in a woman’s space, women’s sport or declare himself a lesbian. It has never been a right of anyone to claim to be the opposite of what they are and force everyone else to go along with it. At least, not in a free society.

If there was a news story declaring that 3 gay couples were getting married a day, that would be a good news story, in part because, legally speaking, no one loses anything from that. It’s not like, when gay marriage was (finally) legalized the rule became that *everyone* had to get gay married. If so, then even the most ardent supporters may have been hesitant.

But when 3 men a day are changing the sex marker on their birth certificate to say they are women, millions of people - particularly women - are losing out by being forced to give up our rights and perception of reality. It’s like being within a marriage we never agreed to be in, and that is why we say “NO”.

[ticky @tickymcgrath]

@AllenbasterAxel @RoadknightThe She leans so far left she’s horizontal

[Prof Marewa Glover @MarewaGlover]

“Child marriage” is a misnomer.
It’s a euphemism intended to sanitise and normalise the sale of a child — usually a girl — into sex and domestic servitude to a pedophile / pedophiles. This violates international human rights on consent and childhood.

Nations must act: set an absolute minimum adult age for contracted marriage & civil unions, and ‘romantic’ (sexual) partnerships, close loopholes enabling adult exploitation of minors in de facto relationships, impose trade sanctions on non-compliant states, penalise offenders and parents/co-conspirators with asset forfeiture, citizenship loss, and imprisonment.

The human race must condemn all sexploitation of children. Stronger prevention strategies, monitoring and enforcement are urgently needed. People, organisations, companies and groups pushing ideologies promoting the sexualisation of infants and children need to be seriously investigated and sanctioned.

Every culture, every nation sets rules on behaviour. It’s time (actually it’s beyond time) for humans to draw a hard line in the sand and stop sexploitation, stop rape & prohibit pedophilia.

[Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌✡️ @sappholives83]

Someone pointed it out, and I apologize for how disgusting this is, but apparently our Euan was a little bit, um…excited…by his foray into the women’s bathroom.

This is exactly why women need spaces of our own. Paraphiliac men see women’s bathrooms as their own personal porn studios, and there have already been rapes and sexual assaults as a result. Are we supposed to wait until he actually takes his dick out in public, like so many of his fellows already have? Will authorities ever do anything about this man to keep him out of the spaces he is legally not supposed to enter?

[ticky @tickymcgrath]

@wilmsfront @ronInBendigo How many of those are called a liar by the premier and his wife on national tv?

[Dr. Simon @goddek]

HOW THEY ENGINEERED THE FAKE PANDEMIC

1. China released staged footage of people “dropping dead” in the streets; scenes never witnessed anywhere else in the world before or after December 2019.

2. A PCR test was rolled out that could not determine whether someone was actually sick. The vast majority of results were false positives.

3. The claim of asymptomatic transmission was heavily promoted to justify restrictions on healthy people and to force mass testing on the entire population; which led to tens of millions of false positive test results.

4. Tech companies and media outlets were mobilized to censor dissent and rebrand inconvenient truths as “misinformation.”

5. Behavioral psychologists were brought in to design fear-based messaging specifically intended to secure public compliance.

6. To keep the illusion of a deadly pandemic alive, they required excess mortality data.

7. Ordinary mild respiratory symptoms alone could not produce those numbers, so the population was subjected to sustained psychological pressure capable of triggering mass psychogenic illness.

8. Relentless fear messaging kept cortisol levels chronically elevated, weakening immune function, particularly among the elderly.

9. Social isolation, delayed medical care, and lockdown policies then generated the excess deaths needed to prop up the narrative.

10. Cloth and surgical masks were suddenly declared effective, something no serious public-health authority had previously recommended for ordinary respiratory pathogens, turning every face into a walking advertisement for fear.

11. People were conditioned to remain isolated “until the vaccine was ready,” buying authorities additional time to expand control.

12. Billions were injected with an experimental product that was claimed to stop both infection and transmission.

13. When those claims collapsed, the goalposts were moved: “Your shot won’t work unless the unvaccinated also take it.”

14. New “variants” were announced every few months to justify an endless series of booster campaigns.

15. A new condition - “long COVID” - was introduced to reframe mounting vaccine side effects.

16. Pharmaceutical companies recorded unprecedented profits, shielded by government contracts and complete legal immunity.

17. Anyone who raised objections was silenced, deplatformed, investigated, or publicly discredited.

18. Once the story became too strained to maintain, the pandemic was abruptly declared over, and the entire episode was treated as if it had never happened.

NEVER FORGET AND PROSECUTE FAUCI!

[UN Watch @UNWatch]

These 5 countries practice Female Genital Mutilation:
🇮🇶 Iraq
🇪🇬 Egypt
🇬🇲 Gambia
🇪🇹 Ethiopia
🇮🇩 Indonesia

These 5 countries sit on the U.N. Human Rights Council:
🇮🇶 Iraq
🇪🇬 Egypt
🇬🇲 Gambia
🇪🇹 Ethiopia
🇮🇩 Indonesia

[ticky @tickymcgrath]

Women sacrificed at the alter of transgenderism yet again. They do not give a shit about female victims. It’s disgusting

[Rachael Wong @RachaelWongAus]

🚨🏳️‍⚧️ A Victorian sex offender has avoided a jail term because of his trans identity.

This isn’t the first time a male sex offender has been rewarded for claiming to be a woman in Australia.

What an absolute joke from this judge, not to mention a slap in the face to the victim and an utter disregard for community safety.

Is this your government’s idea of justice @JacintaAllanMP?

And can journalists PLEASE stop using she/her pronouns for male sex offenders (and all men).

🔗 https://t.co/KKE1vxWCF7

#Auspol #Springst #NotOurCrimes

[Rachael Wong @RachaelWongAus]

🚨🏳️‍⚧️ A Victorian sex offender has avoided a jail term because of his trans identity.

This isn’t the first time a male sex offender has been rewarded for claiming to be a woman in Australia.

What an absolute joke from this judge, not to mention a slap in the face to the victim and an utter disregard for community safety.

Is this your government’s idea of justice @JacintaAllanMP?

And can journalists PLEASE stop using she/her pronouns for male sex offenders (and all men).

🔗 https://t.co/KKE1vxWCF7

#Auspol #Springst #NotOurCrimes

[ticky @tickymcgrath]

@RoadknightThe It’s the heat, I tell you. The unseasonably warm conditions have led to significant evaporation of said waters

[Evidence Based Treatment @DoNoHarm79]

“Rowling breaks Amnesty's spell” printed in The Age newspaper in Australia 🇦🇺 today. Link 🔗 to article in the comments below 👇

[Julie Bindel @bindelj]

New laws in Afghanistan, introduced by the Taliban, mean that men can now marry girls at any age – there is no limit. Male relatives can arrange this with other men, and it’s only once the girls reach puberty that, in extremely limited circumstances, they can ask a court to dissolve the marriage. What’s happening in that country is horrific, and it begs the question why Amnesty are not putting all of their resources into tackling this latest child abuse atrocity.

[Australian Patriot. @JimThom90458694]

The Hidden Risks Behind Labor’s Push to Merge Superannuation and Social Security.

Australia is being told to view the proposed merger of superannuation and Centrelink as a bold reform; a modernisation of retirement policy, a streamlining of welfare, a clever administrative fix. But that framing is the sugar‑coating. The reality underneath is far more consequential and far more dangerous for ordinary Australians.
Superannuation isn’t just a single pool of money held by a handful of large funds. It includes every pension scheme in the country: police, firefighters, ambulance officers, teachers, public servants; the backbone of Australia’s essential workforce. All of these funds sit under the same legislative umbrella. And once they are folded into a Centrelink‑controlled system, the government gains something it has never had before: direct access to the retirement savings of millions of Australians.
This proposal is not about efficiency. It is not about modernisation. It is about access: access to money that was never the government's to touch.
Under the model being floated, Centrelink would determine how much of your own savings you are permitted to withdraw. The ATO would automatically apply taxes before you ever see the money. And at the end of the financial year, you would be left to claw back whatever portion the system decides you’re entitled to reclaim. The independence Australians have always had over their retirement savings would evaporate.
Worse still, your home, the equity you’ve spent decades building, becomes another variable in the welfare equation. A private asset becomes a public lever.
And what does this unlock for the government?
A vast reservoir of funds that can be quietly redirected into immigration programs, housing schemes, and support for new arrivals, all without raising taxes or justifying new spending to voters. It is a redistribution pipeline disguised as “retirement reform.”
This is not the Australian Dream. It is Labor’s version of it; a version where your lifetime savings, your pension, and even your home are repurposed as tools for government policy rather than assets you control.
Australians deserve a retirement system that protects their independence, not one that absorbs their hard‑earned savings into bureaucracy. They deserve transparency, not a structural overhaul that masks fiscal opportunism behind the language of reform. And they deserve a government that respects the boundary between public welfare and private retirement, a boundary that exists for a reason. And, potentially, opens the door to another untapped resource, annual personal property taxes.
The stakes are enormous. This proposal isn’t just a policy shift. It’s a redefinition of ownership, responsibility, and the social contract itself.
The question to voters is this: Will you vote for Labor and allow this to happen, and if they do force through these communist laws, seize your superannuation, and give it to Centerlink to distribute, what will you do about it?

[Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education @craigkellyAFEE]

If you drag yourself out of bed at dawn to grind away in a real wealth-creating job, congratulations — you’re getting absolutely screwed by taxes so some lazy grifter can pocket $400K a year plus $60K super.

Almost half a million dollars for a “Multicultural Coordinator.”

Half a million dollars for a completely useless parasite — a fake "job" manufactured for a Labor Party hack.

And then you wonder why Australia is circling the drain, productivity is in the toilet, and living standards are collapsing for everyone actually producing value.

Why the hell would anyone bust their arse to invest, take real risks, and build a business when you can just suck up to the political correctness machine, push the woke agenda, and rake in half a million dollars doing sweet FA?

Let’s hope One Nation win in Victoria, and clean them all out.

[ticky @tickymcgrath]

@WomenSpeakTas There are now at least 8 massage shops in the main street of my suburb (about 200m). Few are legitimate but the majority have appeared in the last 24 months.

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

The get out of jail free card has been played yet again.

[BoxnDice @BoxnDiceExp]

The Commonwealth Games. Victorians must be so excited. Oh wait Victorian mums and dads are paying nearly a billion dollars for another country to host them.
And the gold medal for this fuckup? You guessed it, Daniel Andrews, Jacinta Allan and the Labor government. @JacintaAllanMP #commonwealthgames #Labor

[katy 🌸 @KatyKray73]

Pete is one of the directly impacted neighbours to the Boree Solar Project. These energy companies won’t stop until solar panels blanket the countryside as far as the eye can see.

Why are rural communities being forced to surrender their environment like this?

It’s devastating to watch this happen across our country.

[Women's Rights Network - WRN @WomensRightsNet]

📢NEW REPORT 📢 86% of sexual crimes in Northern Ireland swim changing rooms are in mixed-sex changing villages.

Our latest report into sexual crimes in Northern Ireland leisure centres confirms that mixed-sex changing rooms are a danger area for women and girls.

In Northern Ireland 86% of sexual crimes in swimming pool changing rooms occurred in mixed-sex facilities. The data correlate with our previous research from England and Wales which shows that 88-90% of changing room sex crimes occur in mixed-sex changing rooms.

Freedom of Information requests to the Police Service of Northern Ireland revealed that 86% of sexual crimes (voyeurism, illicit filming / photography, sexual assaults and rapes) which occurred in leisure centre changing rooms were in mixed-sex facilities compared with 24% which occurred in single-sex facilities. The FOI request covered 12 months from January to December 2023.

Previously, we published Leisure Centres: Putting Women and Girls at Risk containing police data collated from a Freedom of Information (FOI) investigation on sexual crimes in leisure centres in England and Wales.

These data showed that in one year (2023) there were 16 rapes, 80 sexual assaults and 65 acts of voyeurism across 257 leisure centres in England and Wales. As there are approximately 860 leisure centres in England and Wales, and as these crimes are under-reported, the totals will be much higher.

The Sports Councils have actively promoted mixed-sex changing villages as the preferred option for new build and refurbishment projects. @Sport_England design guides are widely used throughout the UK for new-build and refurbishment projects. Sport England states that mixed-sex changing villages are the ‘preferred option’ but says that local councils must ‘risk assess’ their designs. Councils rarely conduct risk assessments that take into account the increased risks of allowing males into areas where women and children are in a state of undress.

Women’s Rights Network calls for:

✅all new-build and refurbishment projects to be designed with single-sex changing as the default option with mixed-sex changing for families;
✅all mixed-sex changing villages to be risk assessed as a matter of urgency and controls put in place to reduce the risk.

Links to the report are in the next post.

[JAKE FLAGPIES23 🏆🖤🤍 @IncrediblyBozza]

Look at the size of this pothole here.

The roads under Jacinta Allan are an absolute disgrace.

@kennettstan #auspol #springst