Olivia
Online
therealtim
@tim407407
Like politicians introducing themselves: husband, father, gay, transgender, drug addict，climate fighter, BLM, vaccine lover, globalist, leftest, What else?
Joined August 2017
314 Following
80 Followers
3K Posts
@SeanCarleton No bone! Scam! Lies!
@shengyango 你大概不知道他代持谁的资产，不知道他那些见不得人的性事吧？
Must see!
President Trump wants Canadians to hear this message
This has to be watched by every Canadian
Terrifying Breaking News 🚨🚨🚨🇨🇦💞🇺🇸
Barry Wunsch "The Canadian Hammer" speaks out about the plans for the military to be used on Canadian citizens and placement of Canada military assets along the U.S. border... Scary stuff and every Canadian needs to hear what he has to say. Barry talks about the Chinese troops training in Canada and the human trafficking reality in B.C. How our officers are being to they are to defend "The New World Order" by the CAF brass....
OP: Kelsey O'Malley link in the first reply to the full video.
Racketeering Expose by Derrick Sweet
Sept 20\26
My name is Derrick Sweet. I am a 61 year old Canadian and earn my living as a stock market analyst. I follow money for a living. I began my career in investing in 1993 at Midland Walwyn in Toronto as a Financial Advisor. After establishing myself as a successful advisor I was recruited by BMO Nesbitt Burns in 1997 and offered the position of Vice President and Senior Investment Advisor and presented with a $250,000.00 signing bonus, which was a lot of money back then. For several years I was one of the top advisors in Canada and a regular invited speaker at investment conferences across Canada. By 2002 I had sold my business to a bank and some time after that I started offering stock research reports to DIY investors who manage their own money. I provide this background on who I am so you have a better understanding how I discovered possible acts of racketeering.
I have been closely following Mark Carney’s violations of the trust he was voted to uphold for too long. I am not a lawyer and am not making any former charges against Mark Carney in this post. I am simply pointing out activities by the PM of Canada that are a direct conflict of interest that could possibly lead to several charges of racketeering.
The Prosecution Case Against Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada (the PM)
I. The Core Allegation: "Pay-to-Play" Infrastructure
The prosecution will argue that the Prime Minister (PM) has operated a criminal enterprise where public policy and taxpayer-funded contracts were used as a vehicle to inflate the value of a private entity (Brookfield) in which he holds a direct pecuniary interest (stock options).
The Nexus: The Acts: 42 distinct government deals awarded to or partnered with Brookfield.
The Benefit: $5 billion in reported profits for the entity.
The Conflict: Multi-million dollar stock options held by the decision-maker (the PM).
II. Count 1: Breach of Trust (Criminal Code s. 122)
Under Section 122, we do not need to prove a "bribe" was paid. We only need to prove that the PM, in connection with his duties, committed a Breach of Trust that would be an offence even if committed against a private person.
The Evidence:
Duty of Office: The PM is mandated by the Conflict of Interest Act to "arrange private affairs to prevent conflicts of interest" (s. 5).
The Breach: By failing to divest or recuse himself from a policy environment that directly benefits a company where he holds options, he has fundamentally violated the trust of the Canadian public.
Legal Standard: Per R. v. Boulanger, the prosecution must show the act was a "marked departure from the standards expected of an individual in the accused's position." Managing 42 deals while holding the stock is a "marked departure" by any reasonable standard.
III. Count 2: Frauds on the Government (Criminal Code s. 121)
This is the Canadian version of "racketeering." Specifically, Section 121(1)(c) prohibits an official from demanding or accepting a benefit for themselves in exchange for "assistance" or "exercise of influence" regarding government dealings.
The Strategy:
We will argue that the Stock Options constitute an "advantage or benefit." The value of these options is tied directly to the success of the 42 government-backed deals. Every time the PM announces a deal, he effectively "cuts himself a check" by driving up the equity value of the firm.
IV. Count 3: Organized Corruption (The "Racketeering" Element)
To push this into the realm of organized crime/racketeering, we look at the Enterprise (the Liberal Party/PMO) and the Pattern of Activity.
The Enterprise: The Prime Minister's Office (PMO).
The Pattern: A series of 42 separate transactions. In racketeering law, we look for "Continuity and Relationship."
Relationship: All deals involve the same beneficiary (Brookfield).
Continuity: The deals spanned a significant period of time and continue as long as the PM holds office.
V. The "Smoking Gun": Intent (Mens Rea)
The defense will claim the PM has a "Blind Trust." I have dismantled this below:
Transparency vs. Blinding: If the PM knows he has the options (which is public knowledge), the trust is not "blind."
The $5 Billion Profit Announcement: We will present evidence that the PM was aware of the financial health of the company while simultaneously crafting legislation (like the CLARITY Act or housing initiatives) that specifically favors Brookfield’s asset classes.
This is not a series of unfortunate coincidences. This is a closed-loop system of enrichment. The Prime Minister is using the sovereign authority of Canada as a marketing arm for a private corporation. He is both the 'Grantor' of the contracts and the 'Grantee' of the profits. In the private sector, this is insider trading. in the public sector, this is a Racket."
CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Draft Criminal Referral – s. 121 & s. 122 Criminal Code (Canada)
TARGET: The Right Honourable Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada
NEXUS: Financial Entanglements with Brookfield Asset Management (BAM)
DATE: February 13, 2026
I. PREAMBLE & JURISDICTION
This referral outlines a prima facie case for investigation by the RCMP Sensitive and International Investigations Unit. The allegations concern a systematic pattern of conduct wherein the subject, in his capacity as Prime Minister, has influenced or directed federal policy and contracts toward Brookfield Corporation (and its subsidiaries) while maintaining a multi-million dollar personal financial stake in said corporation via unexercised stock options and carried interest.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Direct Interest: As of February 12, 2026, the subject remains the holder of approximately $6.8 million USD in Brookfield stock options (calculated at market value), with expiration dates extending into 2033/2034.
The "Profit Nexus": On February 12, 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported annual distributable earnings of $5.4 billion USD, an 11% increase. This profit spike coincided with a series of 42 federal "deals" or policy partnerships announced during the subject’s tenure.
Conflict of Interest Screen Failure: Testimony provided to the House Ethics Committee in late 2025 confirmed that 95% of Brookfield-owned companies (approximately 1,900 entities) are not covered by the subject’s current "ethics screen," allowing for direct interaction between the PMO and entities that contribute to the subject’s future performance pay.
Policy Correlation: Specific federal initiatives—including the $3B auto sector save-out and the AI Infrastructure Fund—directly align with Brookfield’s core 2026 investment strategies (AI infrastructure and energy transition).
III. APPLICABLE OFFENCES (CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA)
COUNT 1: Breach of Trust by Public Officer (s. 122)
The Theory: The subject has exercised the powers of the Prime Minister’s Office for a purpose other than the public good—specifically, the appreciation of his private equity holdings.
Evidence: The subject’s refusal to divest (liquidate) his assets, despite public warnings from the Ethics Commissioner and the Clerk of the Privy Council that a "blind trust" is insufficient for assets as large and specific as Brookfield carried interest.
COUNT 2: Frauds on the Government (s. 121(1)(c))
The Theory: The subject, being an official, has "accepted or agreed to accept" an advantage (the appreciation of stock options and carried interest) from a person/entity (Brookfield) that has active and ongoing dealings with the Government of Canada.
Evidence: The "carried interest" held by the subject is a direct performance-based payout. Every federal contract awarded to a Brookfield-managed fund (e.g., the Global Transition Fund) serves as an indirect "commission" or "reward" to the subject.
IV. INVESTIGATIVE ROADMAP
To move from "referral" to "indictment," the following evidence must be secured via production orders:
Internal PMO Communications: All emails between the PMO and Bruce Flatt/Justin Beber (Brookfield executives) regarding the 42 specific deals.
Blind Trust "Bypass" Logs: Records of "recusal failures" where the subject was present for decisions impacting Brookfield subsidiaries not covered by the s. 1,900-company screen.
Option Exercise Strategy: Correspondence between the subject’s trustee and Brookfield regarding the optimal "cashing out" window relative to government policy announcements.
V. CONCLUSION
The legal threshold for a Section 122 investigation is a "marked departure" from the standard of trust. The simultaneous management of the Canadian economy and the holding of a performance-based stake in a company receiving 40+ federal deals meets this threshold.
I have broken down the 42 Critical Deals and Policy Alignments between the Canadian Federal Government and the Brookfield ecosystem as of early 2026.
In a racketeering case, we don't just look for "contracts"; we look for "The Pattern." These deals are categorized by how they directly feed the valuation of the PM’s private equity holdings.
The "Brookfield 42" Portfolio Analysis
Category A: The Infrastructure & Housing "Mega-Deals" (14 Deals)
These deals leverage the 2025/2026 federal budget initiatives to de-risk Brookfield's massive real estate and modular construction divisions.
The Build Canada Homes Initiative: A $36 Billion federal program. Our investigation shows Brookfield-owned modular housing firms received the lion's share of "fast-track" status.
Canada Growth Fund (CGF) Backstopping: 4 specific "Carbon Capture" deals where the federal CGF provides "price certainty" for Brookfield’s decarbonization projects, effectively guaranteeing their 15-20% IRR (Internal Rate of Return).
The BGIS Master Contract Extension: Brookfield Global Integrated Services (BGIS) continues to manage 3,800+ federal buildings. Even though Brookfield sold its majority stake, it retains a "carried interest" in the performance of the legacy contracts.
Category B: The "Green Transition" Payouts (18 Deals)
This is the most egregious category for a racketeering charge because the PM personally co-headed these funds before taking office.
The Global Transition Fund (GTF) Infusion: Federal pension oversight boards (under PM influence) have directed over $12 Billion into the GTF.
Wind West & Nova Scotia Offshore: 6 deals where federal "nod" and subsidies were given to offshore wind projects where Brookfield is the lead equity partner.
Small Modular Reactors (SMRs): 2 deals for the Darlington SMR project. Brookfield’s acquisition of Westinghouse (nuclear tech) makes them the primary beneficiary of this federal nuclear push.
Category C: The "Digital Sovereignty" & AI Build-out (10 Deals)
A new 2026 frontier. Brookfield recently launched a $100 Billion AI Infrastructure program.
Sovereign Data Centres: 3 contracts awarded to Brookfield subsidiaries to build "Sovereign AI" data centres in Quebec and Ontario.
The "Microsoft Framework" Tailwinds: While the deal is between Microsoft and Brookfield, federal tax credits for "Clean Energy for AI" (passed in the 2025 budget) effectively subsidized $10.5 Gigawatts of Brookfield-owned power facilities.
Prosecutorial Conclusion on the 42 Deals
If we were in court today, I would argue that these are not 42 separate coincidences, but 42 bricks in a wall of private enrichment. The fact that 95% of Brookfield’s 1,900 subsidiaries are not screened means the PM can sit in a meeting about "Critical Mineral Supply Chains" (a Category C deal) and make a decision that enriches a Brookfield subsidiary he technically doesn't "know" he owns—yet his stock options move upward regardless.
Attorney's Note: The $5.4 Billion profit reported yesterday is the "fruit of the poisonous tree." We would argue those profits were only possible because of the de-risking provided by the Canadian taxpayer through these 42 deals.
If you believe I have presented proof of racketeering please do the following;
1) Share immediately on your time time - change your privacy settings to public for this post.
2) Share it with a conservative alternative media organization and your local MP.
3) Follow up with your MP and demand an investigation by law enforcement.
4) Remember, no one is above the law, not even Mark Carney.
12 years under Liberals
🔥 CANADA JUST MADE A FATAL MISTAKE 🔥
41 MILLION Canadians are now HOSTAGES to Mark Carney’s reckless trade war with the United States.
And it’s already BACKFIRING.
💥 41,000 JOBS GONE. IN ONE WEEK.
That’s not a warning. That’s the opening shot.
The United States is done playing Santa Claus. Done subsidizing everyone else’s defense. Done running $50–60 BILLION deficits with Canada and pretending it’s “free trade.”
Trump wants SYMMETRY.
America wants GRATITUDE.
Carney wants WAR… and a selfie with the most dangerous regime on Earth.
This isn’t strategy.
This is a gamble with an entire country’s future.
And Victor Davis Hanson says it plainly:
He will fail.
The new world order just started.
Canada just picked the wrong side.
Watch the full takedown. This one hits different. 🇺🇸⚡
🚨维克多·戴维斯·汉森：加拿大的反美豪赌，马上就要变得代价高昂
4100万加拿大人的命运，如今取决于马克·卡尼能否在他重新挑起的对美贸易战中取得成功。
然而，他会失败。
仅仅在这场关税战的一周之内，加拿大就已经失去了4.1万个工作岗位。
美国正在以前所未有的方式，开启一个新的世界秩序。
“我们不会再一边补贴所有人的国防，一边与一个邻国墨西哥产生2000亿美元的贸易逆差，再与我们的北方邻国加拿大产生500亿到600亿美元的贸易逆差，然后还把这称作一个自由贸易区。
我们已经不再是过去那个可以无限承担一切的富裕超级大国了。
唐纳德·川普总统要的是对等，美国要的是感恩。
而卡尼却想发动一场经济战争，煽动世界舆论来反对美国，并与历史上最具危害性、最致命的政府结盟。”
这是维克多·戴维斯·汉森在今天的《维克多·戴维斯·汉森：简明扼要》节目中所提出的观点。
Who wins and who loses?
We will be the cost
Mark Carney as Lord Farquaad: The tariff pivot will come at a cost. "Some of you may die, but it's a sacrifice I am willing to make."
We need this in Canada immediately...before it's too late.
Germany has been awakened . When will be Canada?
1. Resultado de las elecciones regionales en Sajonia (Saxony-Anhalt), Alemania.
🔴 La AfD obtuvo el 43,8% de los votos. Tendrá 39 escaños, a 3 de la mayoría absoluta. Ganó en 38 de los 41 distritos.
🔴 La AfD obtuvo el 60% de los votos de la clase obrera. Los partidos tradicionales han perdido a los trabajadores.
🔴 La AfD habría ganado con el 51% de no haber sido por este voto por correo. El 25.7% del total de votos emitidos fueron por correo. Los partidos tradicionales obtuvieron casi el doble de porcentaje en el voto por correo que en el voto presencial, mientras que AfD la mitad. [Nota: Francia abolió la votación por correo en 1975, por ser susceptible de fraude electoral, manipulación y violaciones del secreto del voto]
2. Resumen del programa electoral de AfD
Guste o no guste, ¿qué tiene exactamente de neonazi este programa?
✅ Referéndums al estilo suizo
✅ Límites máximo de 8 años a los mandatos de los políticos de carrera
✅ Una Europa de Estados soberanos, una Europa de las Patrias. Si eso no es posible, la salida de la UE
✅ Fin ordenado del euro como moneda común
✅ Control total de las fronteras
✅ Tramitación más dura de las solicitudes de asilo
✅ Repatriación de personas sin derecho de residencia y de delincuentes
✅ Rebajar las cargas fiscales
✅ Fin de la Transición Energética: energía nuclear, carbón, reparación del Nord Stream, fin del impuesto sobre el CO₂, fin de la prohibición de los motores de combustión
✅ Fomento de la familia tradicional mediante una política pronatalista
✅ Fomento de la cultura alemana, protección de la lengua alemana, formando en ella a los inmigrantes.
✅ Rechazo a la ideología de género. Eliminar la promoción LGTBI+ en los colegios públicos.
✅ Deportación de los musulmanes que rechacen el estado de derecho alemán
✅ Refuerzo de la policía
✅ Tolerancia cero con los delincuentes extranjeros y los clanes
✅ Máxima libertad de expresión
✅ Reforma de los medios de comunicación públicos, más diversidad en los medios
3. Compendio de declaraciones y opiniones
«En general, cuando los partidos gobernantes no abordan la migración ilegal, adoptan posturas beligerantes, apoyan las guerras y se niegan a reconocer el alarmante impacto de la política climática europea en la competitividad, pierden las elecciones y son reemplazados por otros partidos que suelen ofrecer soluciones sencillas, pero no por ello menos concretas. Solo tengo un deseo: que este resultado en las elecciones regionales alemanas no dé pie a que se presente la guerra con Rusia como la única forma de desviar la atención de la derrota de los partidos gobernantes. Porque, como dice el refrán, Alemania no comete errores pequeños.» - Robert Fico
«La socialdemocracia es ruina. Y no da votos. Alemania es el aviso más claro. Años de socialdemocracia, intervencionismo, obsesión regulatoria y política antinuclear han destruido competitividad, debilitado la industria y asfixiado al sector primario. SPD y CDU han sido corresponsables de ese consenso. AfD gana porque el descontento es la respuesta a una decadencia política y económica palpable. En Sajonia-Anhalt roza el 44% de los votos.» - Daniel Lacalle
«Ni un solo medio o analista "moderado" dice nada sobre el peligro de la ultraizquierda comunista en Europa (que está en el gobierno de España, campa a sus anchas por Bruselas y ha sacado casi 14% de votos en Sajonia). Eso sí, no paran de "alarmarse" por la victoria de la "ultraderecha" AfD en Sajonia. El problema de siempre es que esos "moderados" europeos están encantados y callados con la ultraizquierda porque les funciona como tonto útil que comparte sus objetivos de control estatista y burocrático. Años blanqueando el socialcomunismo y hundiendo Europa en un erial social-comunista, y ahora se alarman porque la gente dice basta. Por eso ahora lo llaman "ultra".» - Daniel Lacalle
«Los principales medios de comunicación son el enemigo. CNN y WSJ y prácticamente el 100% de los medios principales todos están calificando a AfD como de "extrema derecha". Ulrich Siegmund, el líder conservador de Sajonia, es calificado como "El hombre más peligroso de Alemania".»
Elon Musk contestando a Wall Street Journal: «¡No son de extrema derecha, idiotas! Esto es especialmente estúpido viniendo del WSJ. »
«La política extremista es cuando se mantienen abiertas nuestras fronteras y se nos convierte en extraños en nuestra propia tierra. Extremista es cuando se destruye deliberadamente nuestra infraestructura energética y se hacen explotar centrales nucleares. Extremista es cuando se pagan prestaciones sociales a personas que son miembros de clanes, tienen 32 hijos y son defraudadores de la seguridad social. Vamos a poner fin a esta política extremista, porque nuestro objetivo es seguir una política razonable, conservadora-libertaria para Sajonia-Anhalt y para Alemania.» - Alice Weidel, AfD
«Alemania está de facto en bancarrota y no te lo están diciendo. ¡Todo esto ya no es financieramente sostenible! Toda Europa se dirige en esta dirección porque están invitando a millones de extranjeros y a personas del tercer mundo, prometiendo luego asistencia social masiva, algo que no es posible. Combinar políticas socialistas con una invasión, así como con una postura anti-combustibles fósiles para aumentar los costos de la energía y los productos lo hace aún peor. ¡Elegid AfD en toda Alemania, salvad vuestro país!» - Alice Weidel, AfD.
4. Valoración sobre si AfD es un partido nazi
Hay importantes diferencias entre la AfD y los nazis:
✅ La AfD no es socialista sino todo lo contrario, libertaria, mientras los nazis sí eran socialistas.
✅ La AfD apoya a Israel y a los judíos, en tanto que los nazis los perseguían.
✅ Alice Weidel, a líder de la AfD es lesbiana y está casada Sarah Bossard, una mujer de color de Sri Lanka (o "racializada", como suele decir la izquierda). Sarah Bossard tiene dos hijos biológicos de padres distintos. Ambos hijos son mantenidos por la pareja de lesbianas. Por tanto, la praxis de Alice Weidel no es precisamente la homofobia, la LGTBI+ fobia y el racismo nazi.
Muchos de estos millones de nuevos votantes de derecha ni siquiera tienen la impresión de haberse desplazado hacia la derecha. Si se les pregunta, entre los mayores se escuchan a menudo frases como: «Sigo pensando exactamente lo mismo que hace 20 años.» Sobre todo el CDU (o el SPD) es el que ha cambiado.
De hecho, la mayoría de estos nuevos votantes del AfD ni siquiera cuestionan fundamentalmente los logros culturales de los años sesenta. No creen que la homosexualidad sea mala ni inmoral (la líder de AfD es lesbiana) ni a la moral sexual represiva de los años cincuenta. Pero tampoco les gusta que las drag queens lleven espectáculos con carga erótica a colegios de niños.
La mayoría de los nuevos votantes del AfD tampoco quieren que las mujeres vuelvan a la cocina. Pero tampoco les parece lógico que las mujeres deban ser solo una idea, no un hecho biológico, o que se pueda cambiar de género una vez al año.
La mayoría ni siquiera tiene nada en contra de la inmigración, en principio. Pero quieren que los migrantes delincuentes sean deportados, y quieren deportar a todos los delincuentes, no solo unos pocos.
No quieren volver a una pedagogía con castigos. Pero tampoco quieren escuelas en las que se regalen buenas notas.
🇨🇦 Fellow Canadians…stop taking every Trump criticism of Canada personally.
When Trump attacks “Canada,” much of the time he’s attacking the decisions of the Canadian government not ordinary Canadians.
There’s a difference between being anti-Canada and being anti–Liberal government policy.
Bad governments get bad results.
Change the government.
Change the results.
Don’t let partisan spin turn a political dispute into a personal attack on 40 million Canadians.
The Canadian government facts revealed in this small animation film will blow your mind and open your eyes…
Check it out. It’s a good Watch…
pass it on!
Canada's politicians went on American TV and got ROASTED 😂
It is important to understand as you watch this:
> Liberal politicians don't get asked hard questions by Canadian MSM.
> Both of them were part of the government that gave us a lost decade.
> Chrystia Freeland, who has zero background in finance, was the Finance Minister.
"Tax and regulatory competitiveness, how bad is it in Canada?!
Carney over at Davos talked about cozying up to China and the New World Order...
GDP growth in Canada over the last 10 years, you are deadlast basically...
The Canadian people deserve to have a better standard of living, it shouldn't be going down."
⌚️Definitely worth the Watch.
@pietehao 江学勤是我党地下战线的同志
‼️ BREAKING: Today, the government decided to cover up their lie, with another lie.
@DLeBlancNB put out a statement today that’s a revisionist approach to what happened instead of taking ownership for lying to Canadians.
This is how the Liberal government manipulates public perception & lies to avoid accountability.
Carney was caught lying to Canadians. Again.
Parti Quebecois learned the truth through the New York Times.
The US Trade Representative, who speaks fluent French and has a son born in Paris, confirmed that the French language and sovereignty were never a topic of discussion.
And now, the Liberal government priority is to save face instead of recalling Parliament.
EVERYTHING CANADIANS WERE TOLD IS A LIE 🇺🇸 CLAIMS 🚨🇨🇦
Howard Lutnick says Mark Carney walked away from the U.S. deal for political reasons.
He says Canada had an agreement the best deal in the world.
And on French?
“What could matter less to America?”
Lutnick says the French-language issue was never the real problem and claims Carney wanted out because fighting Trump was politically useful ahead of key by-elections.
If that is true, this is far bigger than a failed trade negotiation.
Liberals are willing to DESTROY the economy, kills jobs and increase cost of living for power.
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.6M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.9M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.6M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.2M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers