Tim

[For ღ of God ✟ & Country 🇺🇸 @CMSGF52777]

@MelGibson_1th This is beyond scary and crazy!!

Women are literally putting their children’s harm on camera as a public offering to Lindsay Clancy.

[Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman]

EVIL: There’s something about this case that feels darker every time you look at it.

You can read every headline, hear every argument, and still come back to the same chilling reality: three children are dead. When I look at Lindsey Clancy, I don’t see a sympathetic story. I see a case that makes your blood run cold.

WARNING: this video may seriously creep you out.

[Fox News @FoxNews]

BREAKING: The Lindsay Clancy trial remains in limbo after Judge William Sullivan pauses a mistrial declaration for one hour in response to an emergency appeal filed by Clancy's defense attorney.

Kevin Reddington is seeking what is known as a Chapter 211, Section 3 petition.

It asks a single justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court to step in and review a lower court’s decision before the normal appeals process plays out. | @BryanLlenas

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

MUST WATCH

Brave young girl SPEAKS OUT at a @WCPSS board meeting in NC against a mentally ill male teacher pretending to be a woman:

"God made us only a girl or a boy at birth. Anything else is confusing. I want to learn at school, not be confused. I want to feel safe. A man teacher dressed as a woman and acts like a woman scares me. Please protect me and other kids." 🔥🔥🔥

[Truth Awakening @TruthAwakeningX]

🚨🚨🚨 **He lined them up and shot them. She timed it and strangled them. He got three life sentences. She got a movement. That’s the double standard.**

👉Chad Doerman shot his three sons—7, 4, and 3—in their home. Lined them up. Hunted the one who ran. Told them they were the best boys ever, then killed them. Said he did it for God. Three consecutive life sentences. No parade of supporters calling him a victim.

👉Lindsay Clancy strangled her three kids—5, 3, and 8 months—with exercise bands after sending her husband out on a timed errand. Jumped out a window. Admits she did it. Women online: “I could have been her.” GoFundMe in the hundreds of thousands. She’s the one who needs understanding.

👉Same number of dead children. Same year. One gets a cage until he dies. The other gets a movement. That’s the split. The kids are still dead either way.

[General Mike Flynn @GenFlynn]

I want the one juror holdout in the Clancy trial to fight like they are at the Alamo!

[Fox News @FoxNews]

BREAKING: Judge William Sullivan said he intends to declare a mistrial, but no mistrial has officially been declared because the jury has not been brought into the courtroom or dismissed.

Before that could happen, defense attorney Kevin Reddington requested time to appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, seeking a stay so he can argue the holdout juror should be replaced before a mistrial is declared.

@Donnarotunno called the move unprecedented, saying an appeal could pause the case and leave the jury waiting while the higher court decides how to proceed.

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

🇺🇸 MISTRIAL DECLARED IN LINDSAY CLANCY MURDER CASE

The judge in the Lindsay Clancy trial has declared a mistrial after the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict.

According to reports from the courtroom, a lone male juror refused to join the other jurors in voting not guilty, preventing an acquittal.

Clancy was accused of killing her three young children in 2023, with the trial ultimately turning on whether she was criminally responsible given her mental state at the time.

One juror held his ground.

And because criminal verdicts require unanimity, there is now no verdict at all.

Writer: Oliver

[Glenn Beck @glennbeck]

I have one simple question for the women holding their babies outside the courtroom in support of Lindsay Clancy: What if the roles were reversed? If a father was accused of systematically planning and carrying out the murder of his three kids, would you be protesting in his defense? Do you think men would be there with signs saying, "We stand with you"? Absolutely not.

Not only would it take about 10 minutes for that guy to be convicted, I don’t think a single person in America would defend him just because he's a man. And if they did, we’d say the same thing we're saying now: It's pure psychosis.

We need to take mental health seriously, but that doesn't mean completely breaking our ability to distinguish right from wrong.

[Trump Girl @TrumpGirlLove]

🚨🚨🚨 **He lined them up and shot them. She timed it and strangled them. He got three life sentences. She got a movement. That’s the double standard.**​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

👉Chad Doerman shot his three sons—7, 4, and 3—in their home. Lined them up. Hunted the one who ran. Told them they were the best boys ever, then killed them. Said he did it for God. Three consecutive life sentences. No parade of supporters calling him a victim.

👉Lindsay Clancy strangled her three kids—5, 3, and 8 months—with exercise bands after sending her husband out on a timed errand. Jumped out a window. Admits she did it. Women online: “I could have been her.” GoFundMe in the hundreds of thousands. She’s the one who needs understanding.

👉Same number of dead children. Same year. One gets a cage until he dies. The other gets a movement. That’s the split. The kids are still dead either way.

[Nick Sortor @nicksortor]

🚨 BREAKING — IT'S OFFICIAL: The judge in the Lindsay Clancy trial has declared a MISTRIAL after a LONE MALE juror BLOCKED a NOT GUILTY VERDICT for Clancy

This man is an absolute HERO!

THANK YOU for REFUSING to give in to the DERANGED jurors trying to let a baby kiIIer go free!

[Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson]

The Judge in the Lindsay Clancy case is on the verge of declaring a mistrial.

The defense just delayed it with a last minute Hail Mary attempt to stop it.

It will fail.

God bless that one juror for standing up to the mob.

[Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman]

The mistrial fight just got even uglier.

Defense wants the judge to poll the jury on first-degree, second-degree, and manslaughter separately. Why? If they were unanimous that it wasn’t first-degree, Reddington will try to slap double jeopardy on that charge so prosecutors can’t bring it again on retry.

Then he called the holdout a “travesty,” floated an Americans with Disabilities Act claim, and begged for an hour to race an emergency stay to a single justice so the mistrial doesn’t land.

Translation: one juror wouldn’t give them the walk they wanted, so now they’re trying to freeze the mistrial and kneecap the murder charges before the next trial even starts.

Three dead kids.
Games in the courthouse.
This is what a hung jury looks like when the defense smells an escape hatch.

[Kelly💚🌴 @kelly_steffee]

📌Patrick Clancy V Dr. Jennifer Tufts, CNP Rebecca Jollotta, Aster Mental Health, and South Shore Health System

Defendants Move to Dismiss Patrick Clancy's Amended Civil Complaint

The defendants in Patrick Clancy's wrongful death lawsuit, Dr. Jennifer Tufts, CNP Rebecca Jollotta, Aster Mental Health, and South Shore Health System have formally asked the Norfolk Superior Court to dismiss Patrick's amended complaint in its entirety.

In their Motion to Dismiss, the defendants argue that:

🔹 They did not owe a legal duty of care to Patrick and Lindsay Clancy's three children under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 123, §36B, which governs certain duties of mental health providers.

🔹 The amended complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to satisfy either of the statute's narrow exceptions that could impose liability on mental health professionals.

🔹 The complaint allegedly relies on conclusory allegations rather than specific factual allegations required to survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.

🔹 They argue that the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan Clancy were not reasonably foreseeable to the defendants and, therefore, they cannot be held legally responsible.

Based on those arguments, the defendants are asking Judge Michael P. Doolin to dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice under Mass. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), meaning Patrick would be barred from refiling these same claims if the motion is granted.

It's important to remember that this is the defendants' legal argument not a ruling by the court. Filing a motion to dismiss is a common step in civil litigation, particularly in complex medical negligence and wrongful death cases.

Patrick will have the opportunity to file an opposition, and the court will ultimately decide whether the allegations in the amended complaint are legally sufficient for the case to move forward.

This civil case remains separate from the ongoing criminal proceedings involving Lindsay Clancy.

#PatrickClancy #LindsayClancy #WrongfulDeath #Massachusetts #MentalHealth #CivilLitigation #CourtUpdate

FULL MOTION IN LINK👇👇

https://t.co/P6b2vlYoOa

[Kelly💚🌴 @kelly_steffee]

📌 Lindsay Clancy v. Tufts, et al.

NEW CIVIL FILINGS

Three separate defendants have now filed Answers and Jury Demands responding to Lindsay Clancy’s Second Amended Complaint in Norfolk Superior Court:

🔸 Dr. Alia Goodheart
🔸 Dr. Elizabeth Madva
🔸 The McLean Hospital Corporation

The filings were docketed August 12, 2026, in Civil Action No. 2682CV00081, specially assigned to Judge Michael Doolin.

One notable admission from Dr. Goodheart’s answer: she acknowledges that she is a board-certified psychiatrist, an attending physician at McLean Hospital, and that she treated Lindsay Clancy at McLean.

The defendants otherwise begin their responses by denying the allegations contained in the introductory section of Lindsay’s complaint.

This civil case is continuing to move forward alongside everything unfolding in the criminal case. I’ll be watching these filings closely because the medical treatment Lindsay received before January 2023 remains a major part of the overall story.

Multiple filings in link below

https://t.co/oyU6ZZu7Si

[Porcupine Pete 🏴‍☠️ @pete_porcupine]

The jury in Lindsay Clancy’s trial is returning for a sixth day of deliberations after two deadlock notes. If her husband had been the one who killed their three children, this case would have been over in minutes.
Women do not get a pass on murder simply because they are mothers. The same rules must apply to both sexes. Mental health claims that would be dismissed for a man are being treated as a serious defense here.
Equal justice means equal consequences. When courts treat mothers and fathers differently in the killing of children, they weaken the law itself and fail the victims.

[Kelly💚🌴 @kelly_steffee]

📌LINDSAY CLANCY CIVIL CASE UPDATE

NEW FILING

A new filing was docketed August 6, 2026 in Lindsay M. Clancy v. Jennifer M. Tufts, M.D., et al.,

Norfolk Superior Court, Civil Action No. 2682CV00081.

🔶 Defendant Jennifer Tufts, M.D. has formally demanded that Lindsay Clancy’s medical-malpractice lawsuit be presented to a Medical Malpractice Tribunal pursuant to Massachusetts law.

🔶 Dr. Tufts states that the claims against her involve psychiatry, and specifically requests that a psychiatrist serve as the medical member of the tribunal.

🔶 The filing states the lawsuit alleges “malpractice, mistake, or error against providers of health care.”

🔶 The demand was also being filed simultaneously with the Massachusetts Medical Society, as required under the applicable Superior Court rule.

What does this mean?

A medical-malpractice tribunal is an early screening process in Massachusetts malpractice cases. It evaluates whether the plaintiff’s evidence, if properly substantiated, is sufficient to raise a legitimate question of liability appropriate for judicial inquiry.

This is significant because Lindsay’s civil lawsuit puts the mental-health treatment she received before the deaths of her children directly under legal scrutiny including the actions of individual providers and institutions named as defendants.

The case is specially assigned to Judge Michael P. Doolin.

🔶 This filing does NOT mean the tribunal has ruled against Lindsay or decided whether malpractice occurred. Dr. Tufts is requesting that the case against her go through the tribunal process.

This civil case is absolutely one to watch alongside the criminal proceedings.

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #MentalHealth #PostpartumMentalHealth #MedicalMalpractice #CourtUpdate

full filing in the link below⬇️⬇️
https://t.co/MUHdwGtrRw

[Trump Girl @TrumpGirlLove]

🚨 Possible verdicts in the Lindsay Clancy trial

The jury in the Lindsay Clancy case (Plymouth Superior Court) is now deliberating three counts of first-degree murder. Because she has admitted causing the deaths, the main question is whether she was criminally responsible and, if so, which level of homicide applies. Massachusetts has no death penalty.

For each child the verdict slip gives these options:

🚨1. Guilty of first-degree murder
Requires proof of either deliberate premeditation or extreme atrocity/cruelty (or both). This is a mandatory sentence of life in prison without parole.

🚨2. Guilty of second-degree murder
The jury finds she caused the deaths with malice (intent to kill, intent to cause grievous bodily harm, or an act a reasonable person would know created a plain and strong likelihood of death) but without the extra first-degree elements. Sentence is life with the possibility of parole.

🚨3. Guilty of manslaughter
A lesser included offense the judge allowed the jury to consider. This would mean the deaths resulted from wanton or reckless conduct rather than murder. Maximum sentence is 20 years per count; the judge decides whether sentences run concurrently or consecutively.

🚨4. Not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility (NCR)
The defense theory: she had a mental disease or defect (postpartum psychosis) that left her unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions or to conform her conduct to the law. The prosecution must disprove this beyond a reasonable doubt. An NCR verdict is an acquittal on the criminal charges, but it triggers civil commitment to a secure psychiatric facility under Massachusetts law. She would not simply walk free.

The 12 deliberating jurors must be unanimous on each count. A hung jury on any count would produce a mistrial on that charge and the possibility of a retrial.

[ASNA @AkhbarSite]

Three children were strangled in their own home. That is the crime.
If a jury — or the culture around this trial — treats Lindsay Clancy’s “hormonal status” as the reason those children are dead, we are not being compassionate. We are writing a new rule: a woman’s biology can cancel her agency after she gives birth.
Postpartum psychosis is real. It is rare. It is a psychiatric emergency. Most women who get it do not murder anyone. Treating it seriously is not the same as turning “hormones” into a get-out-of-murder card.
The risk is not medical. It is legal and political.
Once the state accepts that a mother’s reproductive chemistry can erase criminal responsibility for killing her kids, every institution that deals with women will notice:
Custody.
Hiring.
Security clearances.
Firearms.
Political office.
Whether a woman is “stable enough” after pregnancy.
That is not feminism. That is a return to the old idea that women are periodically not fully persons — too hormonal, too postpartum, too biologically compromised to be held to the same standard as men.
Equal rights require equal accountability. You cannot demand full legal adulthood and then argue that female biology is a standing exception when the act is unforgivable.
If Clancy was psychotic, she belongs in a locked hospital, not a victory lap. If she was not, she belongs in prison. What she does not get to do is turn three dead children into a new doctrine that every woman after childbirth is a potential legal non-person.
Women’s rights do not survive a world where “her hormones did it” becomes an acceptable answer for filicide.
The children are still dead. The precedent is what lives.
#lindsay #clancy #women #समाज_की_शत्रु_सत्यार्थप्रकाश

[Righteous Cause 🇺🇸 @RighteoussCause]

This guy writes:

“If Lindsay Clancy is found innocent because hormones made her emotionally unstable, women better be very careful celebrating that verdict—because the law loves precedent.

From that day forward:

Job application: “Are you currently hormonal?”

“I’m a woman.”

“Thank you. I think we’ll be going in a different direction.”

No female police officers. Sorry, we can’t hand a loaded gun to someone whose legal defense might be, “My hormones were acting up.”

No high-stress jobs either. No air-traffic controllers. No surgeons. No nuclear launch codes.

One bad hot flash and—BOOM! 💥

And women definitely can’t be judges. How can you determine whether someone else is emotionally stable when your own gender just established in court that hormones can make you kill three people?

No female politicians either. You can’t be trusted to run the country if, according to your own argument, your endocrine system occasionally takes over the government.

And custody hearings?

“Ordinarily, children belong with their mother. However, according to the Lindsay Clancy precedent, she may be only one hormone away from a Netflix documentary.”

Kids go to Dad.

Dad doesn’t know their shoe sizes, the pediatrician, the school schedule, or where the snacks are—but apparently he’s the safe option now. 😂

That’s the problem with turning a tragic case into a sweeping legal excuse: you better be prepared for where that logic leads.
https://t.co/J6EtiBOOm6