Great high school coaches are quitting because they don’t want to deal with all the nonsense that has nothing to do with basketball.. hard to blame them
@JDBunkis It's easy. Cap space. The $5m or so they're netting in cap space has a high chance of turning into the most impactful part of this deal for either team.
@AdamWylde Can’t evaluate the trade until we see how the Leafs use the cap space. $5m in cap space could lead to the most impactful player(s) in this deal.
PARENTS: Don't build your happiness around your kid’s athletic performance. If you get in a bad mood because they played bad, take a break from the game. Your kid needs to have tough performances to learn, not have great performances to make you feel good.
🗣️ @DrBhrettMcCabe
@Mainely_Leafs Ideally both. Sell for as high as possible and recover assets. Can look to fill the spot via FA or trade in offseason. Leafs have them both now and not winning. If only keeping 1 has to be Roy. Laughton costs more, and that’s assuming u even can keep him.
Many are justifying the Kyle Tucker signing, by saying that any owner could spend like the Dodgers but “they just don’t want to win enough”. This is the most idiotic take I’ve ever seen. It shows you know nothing about the business side of the game.
MLB let Dodgers keep almost all of their TV Money. They are the only team that gets to do this because of negotiations during the McCourt Bankruptcy.
After the bankruptcy settlement, They negotiated the largest local TV deal in all of MLB but the settlement amount subject to revenue share was based on the OLD contract. They do not have to share most of their TV money and this is what allows the insane spending. Again, they are 1 of 30 teams to get this carveout from the league and the only team who could even attempt to spend like this.
Stop saying other owners are cheap. None of them have a special exemption on revenue sharing for their TV contracts like the Dodgers do. MLB Created this situation.