Lo digo como psicólogo: Uno tiene que aprender a cuidarse a sí mismo y a cuestionar todo. Todo lo que sale de silicon valley es falopa de primera calidad que viene con crecimiento económico. La IA es una adicción total porque está disfrazada de productividad. Las redes sociales nos alejan de quienes queremos, la gente prefiere scrollear a salir a bailar o conocer gente o coger o tener hijos. Los juegos y las películas están diseñados para que no podamos dejarlos. Cada minuto perdido de nuestra atención y vida con amigos se convierte en un dólar de capitalización de varias grandes empresas basadas en tech (Google, Meta, Apple, Microsoft). Nada tiene límite. Porque además tienen toda la data de nuestro comportamiento, lo que decimos, escribimos, todo nuestro trabajo, es el colonialismo pero del SXXI y nosotros somos los pueblos originarios que pagamos en vez de con oro, con nuestra salud mental. Por eso tratar de tener ownership de nuestra vida y limitar la tecnología es clave para no perder todo lo que pasa fuera de ella, recuperar las verdaderas redes sociales, la inteligencia humana, y volver al verdadero online que es salir afuera. Que paradoja igual, aguante la tecnología que la amo, pero ojo.
Have you noticed that women can be highly rude and emotional with ease towards men but towards other women they fuckin behave?
They're afraid of social perceptions within the female matrix they inhabit but they dgaf about male perceptions
This is embarrassing
@VulgarityPilled keep people poor and ignorant like jungle animals, god wants people making miracles, monarchism wants people eating shit but kings eating meat
The Westerner struggles to grasp the reality that he is unagentic because the embers of his individual ambition are stoked from a very early age
He believes he has upward mobility, and that if his political apparatus is doing things that hurt his upward mobility, he can make his voice heard, either via the ballot box or media demonstration. He, along with millions of other normal, upstanding citizens, are "in charge."
What he and the rest of them, therefore, fail to understand, is the real nature of power in the post-ancien regime age. Power is a capital investment. Capital bulldozes over the voices of hundreds of millions of voters.
Capital is what gave Epstein his modeling agency front, his island, his breeding farm, his contacts with other members of his class, and, ultimately, his blackmail leverage.
🫵You🫵 are not, for lack of a better word, a capitalist. They are. Capital created popular sovereignty as their means to launder the responsibility that came with their power.
This guy with no design background just built a 3D website that would have cost a client $8,000 at any agency.
He didn't hire a developer. He didn't open Figma. He opened Claude and started typing what he wanted to see. 3D objects that move on scroll. Animations that follow the cursor. Cinematic transitions between sections.
Claude generated the code. Emergent rendered it live. He adjusted with more prompts until the screen showed something he couldn't have built in 6 months of learning.
The whole thing took one afternoon.
What used to require a senior developer and a $15,000 budget now requires knowing how to describe what you want clearly.
That's it. That's the only skill.
Most people have Claude. Almost none of them know how to actually use it.
This article below fixes that.
This question is specifically designed to pull everyone into a red v blue matrix with Jimmy Donaldson being the perfect conduit for it
It's a psychological primer for the 2026 midterms
And it's worked like a charm
The sins of the elite are currently being transferred to you
They quoted him $18,000. He opened Claude instead.
Same result. One afternoon. $20/month.
The gap between knowing how to use Claude and not knowing is worth $18,000.
This article below fixes that.
@InceptionESTP @TendenciaDeX cuando como hombres no tienes la capacidad de atraer mujeres variadas haces eso, perdonas todas y te quedas con lo que te cae en la orilla lol. estos tipos con baja autoestima alegaran amor, pureza moral y cualquier justificacion cornuda porque sencillamente no tienen para elegir
If you want a rare life, you have to be delusional. Doubt can enter your mind, and it can sound reasonable, but if you entertain it too much it will slowly drag you down into stagnation. I'd rather reap the lesson from massive failure than do nothing because it's not "realistic."
GPT Image 2 launched 48 hours ago.
People are already using it to make things that were impossible before.
15 insane examples you have to see:
1) Creating full 3D worlds with 1 prompt:
become a generalist.
specialization makes you efficient. generalization makes you dangerous.
what it actually means:
• learn across domains → math, physics, software, economics, biology. patterns repeat across fields.
• connect ideas → innovation happens at the intersection, not inside silos.
• adapt fast → when one field shifts, you don’t collapse, you pivot.
• see systems → specialists see parts, generalists see the whole
• build end-to-end → from idea → design → implementation → delivery
the world rewards specialists in stable environments.
it rewards generalists when things are changing.
right now, everything is changing.
don’t just go deep.
go wide, then stack depth where it matters.
For those who don’t know Prof. Donald Knuth —
--1974 Turing Award laureate.
--Often called the father of algorithm analysis.
--Author of The Art of Computer Programming — the book that shaped generations of computer scientists.
He just turned 89 this year!
Absolute legend. Respect!
Prof. Donald Knuth opened his new paper with "Shock! Shock!"
Claude Opus 4.6 had just solved an open problem he'd been working on for weeks — a graph decomposition conjecture from The Art of Computer Programming.
He named the paper "Claude's Cycles."
31 explorations. ~1 hour. Knuth read the output, wrote the formal proof, and closed with: "It seems I'll have to revise my opinions about generative AI one of these days."
The man who wrote the bible of computer science just said that. In a paper named after an AI.
Paper: https://t.co/juSOmK9vOt
16. The Assumption Excavator
The most dangerous part of any research isn't what it says.
It's what it takes for granted.
Use this:
"Go through my uploaded sources and surface every assumption the authors make without explicitly stating it. For each assumption: 1) State it clearly in plain language, 2) Identify whether it is widely accepted, contested, or rarely examined in the field, 3) Explain what would change about the conclusions if this assumption turned out to be wrong, 4) Flag the single assumption that, if challenged, would most significantly undermine the findings."
Challenge the foundations before you build on them.
Me gustó mucho esta idea de Andrej Karpathy:
usar LLMs para construir tu propio sistema de conocimiento.
En vez de usarlos solo para resolver algo puntual, los usás para ir guardando y ordenando lo que aprendés.
Con el tiempo, tenés una base que crece y se conecta sola.
¿Cómo funciona?
1) juntás info (papers, artículos, repos) en una carpeta base
2) el LLM la convierte en una wiki en markdown (resúmenes + conceptos + links)
3) usás Obsidian para explorar todo
4) le hacés preguntas y responde usando esa base
5) lo que genera (notas, slides, gráficos) vuelve a la wiki
Cada interacción va mejorando el sistema.
Además, el LLM mantiene la calidad detecta inconsistencias, completa datos y sugiere nuevas conexiones.