THREAD: Resurgence
or: How do physicists keep getting away with ignoring infinitely big things?
I've been learning about this for a few weeks and I think it's really cool and want to share it with you
1/20
@facetedcarapace Normal person: "wow, the Democrats won the midterms by an amazing margin! I can't wait to see the policies this will allow them to push"
Dem strategists: "let's advocate for child abuse"
@BobMurphyEcon Importantly the question fails to specify the nature of the lions' preference for the steak. Are they starving? How many lions do you need to feed another lion? Is it just a nice snack? That makes a huge difference
If you are a famous person, do NOT acknowledge or speak to Eric Weinstein. He will spend the next two years going on podcasts namedropping you and referring to you as his friend and colleague
@m966021@Leophilius Solving is/ought is, by Beth Definability, equivalent to giving an explicit definition of "ought" in terms of "is"
But this is possible if and only if moral facts are in fact descriptive, the very thing you were hoping to demonstrate
Preview clip.
Dan Hooper outlines how physics advances by both paradigm shifts and essential periods of "normal progress" where anomalies, new technologies and new methods accrue.
We can't always be in a paradigm shift, by definition.
Link: https://t.co/o2c5MaEWg6
Please for the love of God, please, please, please, please let this happen. Please God, please, please, God, please. I need this so badly. I need it so badly it's unreal. I'm begging you, I'm begging you. Hashem, my Lord in heaven, please, please