Timitus

bear markets are more fun anyways

[Timitus @timitus_og]

@ManuThiele L take

[Yung Lean Brasil @yungleanbrasil]

Actually, this is what a Swedish genius looks like

[BlackRedGuard ☭ 🇵🇸🔻⛓️‍💥 @OGBlackRedGuard]

I just saw a little kid with her guts hanging out, courtesy of Israel.

[Lewis Brackpool @Lewis_Brackpool]

Fuck off.

If Kirk was British you would have locked him up.

[Timitus @timitus_og]

@NEVERDOOMPRO How has nobody mentioned rocky?

[Timitus @timitus_og]

@jacko_ykb @yungtobyy @zAstralRM @Asensii20 It seems like you are actually right. I talked to a ref and he explained it to me. The rule doesnt make sense to me in such a close scenario where he played the ball 1s before but it is what it is..
Sorry for calling u retarded 😅

[Timitus @timitus_og]

@jacko_ykb @yungtobyy @zAstralRM @Asensii20 Man u are retarded

[Timitus @timitus_og]

@smokebtd @FabrizioRomano U need to find god fr

[Timitus @timitus_og]

This is pretty awesome. Way less scary then a freefall tower! 😅

[Timitus @timitus_og]

@LNobbins What did walker do that made pep so mad?

[Timitus @timitus_og]

10 year old twitter user thinks 18year old talent who barely played with the best striker in front of him is a failure…

[͏͏͏𝐉𝐚𝐲 ⌖ 🇿🇦🇪🇸 @cagiago_]

Oi this might be the first ever failed industry plant, mf had the most iconic PR run to produce 7 G/A 😭

[Timitus @timitus_og]

They are gonna pull another 9/11 again….

[𝕀𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕝𝕚𝕔𝕠 Very poor & Very stupid @insiliconot]

Even if someone would provide an miracle strategy/indicator with 100% accuracy, majority would still lose money when manual trading. Because its not really market knowledge or some secret sauce that prevents manual traders from success.
At its root its the perception over markets, that is not perceiving it like a job or strict ruleset game, where u login, scalp some profit, logout, came in next day, but perceiving it as casino/golden ticket/homerun etc.
To be successful in this first you need to win a fight against yourself, fight against most basic psychological instincts and feels, a fight that filters 99% of people attempting it and makes it lowest success rate profession on earth.
Every single losing trader, with little thought put into it, and experience past the point of coping with "market's is scam", "rigged", "algos/divine forces/exchange/market maker on my ass rekting me" will understand why he's lossing money, why he's not succeeding, yet he do same things and same mistakes over and over.
Its an individual choice, a personal fight, noone can help him but speculator himself.
Most plebs that actually invested some time to learn this art probably already have everything that is required to be successful and operate effectively, yet it choses not to use it by losing to its own emotions, perceptions, and thoughts.

[Dip Wheeler @DipWheeler]

"you financed a $12.78 steak bowl from chipotle?"

[Chase Passive Income @chasedownleads]

Excited to announce that I closed on a $31.38 transaction to secure a burrito and side of chips

20-year senior fixed rate financing was provided by Klarna

DoorDash provided delivery of the asset

Congratulations to all involved

[THE Dread Pirate 🇺🇸🏴‍☠️🐧 @TtamStrebor]

From @grok: Wickard v. Filburn was a landmark United States Supreme Court case decided in 1942 that significantly expanded the federal government's power to regulate economic activity under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

The case involved Roscoe Filburn, an Ohio farmer who grew wheat on his land. Under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, the federal government set quotas on wheat production to stabilize prices during the Great Depression. Filburn exceeded his allotted quota, growing extra wheat for personal use on his farm, such as feeding his livestock. The government fined him for overproduction, arguing that even though the excess wheat wasn’t sold in interstate commerce, it still affected the national wheat market by reducing the amount Filburn would otherwise have purchased.

Filburn challenged the fine, claiming that his wheat production for personal use didn’t involve interstate commerce and thus fell outside Congress’s regulatory authority. The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision written by Justice Robert H. Jackson, disagreed. The Court ruled that even small, local activities—like growing wheat for personal use—could have a substantial cumulative effect on interstate commerce when aggregated across many farmers. This interpretation broadened the scope of the Commerce Clause, allowing Congress to regulate not just direct interstate transactions but also activities that indirectly influenced the national economy.

The decision (317 U.S. 111) marked a turning point in constitutional law, solidifying federal authority over a wide range of economic activities. It’s often cited as a key precedent for expansive federal regulation, influencing cases on everything from civil rights to healthcare. Critics argue it stretched the Commerce Clause beyond its original intent, while supporters see it as a practical adaptation to a modern, interconnected economy.

[Kalu Aja @FinPlanKaluAja1]

This is wealth

[͏͏͏𝐉𝐚𝐲 ⌖ 🇿🇦🇪🇸 @cagiago_]

Real Madrid doesn’t even celebrate their UCL’s like this

[Kaizen D. Asiedu @thatsKAIZEN]

Woman makes bad life decisions, wants everyone else to bear the weight.

[Sevilla FC @SevillaFC_ENG]

@TheRealOlagreat 100k