Gustav Tinghög

Profesor @Liu_universitet co-director @jedilab_liu. behavioral economics, health economics, moral decision making, volleyball tv-show host

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

JediLab The Movie is here! soundtrack available at your local record shop. https://t.co/dLygsvf2ng via @YouTube

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

Across two preregistered experiments, we find no consistent effect of monetary incentive schemes on prosocial behavior in standard economic | Experimental Economics | Cambridge Core - https://t.co/lx5YG4eUWO

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

feat. Jedi padawan @amandalinki Jedi knight @linakoppel, and Jedi master @DanielVastfjall

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

Is research ethics universal—or discipline-specific? Surveying 11,000+ researchers & ethics reviewers, we uncover systematic field differences in attitudes toward QRPs, with medical researchers the strictest. New @jedilab_liu paper out in Research Policy https://t.co/jOgqa37KO5

[Kajsa Hansson @KajsaHansson]

New paper out! We examine urban–rural tensions in Sweden, testing whether place identities and resentment shape how people evaluate political statements.

[Cambridge University Press - Politics @CUP_PoliSci]

#OpenAccess from @JEPS_ed -

A Registered Report on Place-Based Resentment: Exploring Urban-Rural Tensions in Sweden - https://t.co/TmQ7DsgrAD

- Kajsa Hansson, Gissur Erlingsson & @tinghog

#FirstView

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

@linakoppel @amandalinki 8/📄 Read the full open-access paper:
https://t.co/ydi7qMiWiS
📂 Data + code: https://t.co/mKRssv26sQ
#AcademicTwitter #ScienceEthics #OpenScience

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

🔔 New paper alert!
Scientists often juggle what’s best for science vs. their careers—a tradeoff between communitarian & individualistic ideals.

We call this scientific normative dissonance.
Study by @linakoppel @amandalinki maps it across academia:
https://t.co/WCTwUejDGk
🧵👇

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

@linakoppel @amandalinki 7/
Researchers in psychology showed slightly lower normative dissonance than those in economics & business—especially on whether research should be judged on merit (universalism) or reputation (particularism).
Albeit sample size was modest.

[Koenfucius 🔍 @koenfucius]

People approach risky decisions differently when deciding for themselves than for others, the assumption goes.

Research by @lewendm—with 3 samples of professional decision makers and a general one—finds ~no significant evidence this is the case (!)

https://t.co/XqHEjJZykL

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

@Humanpapers Misunderstanding was when subjects responded incorrectly to one or both comprehension questions shown in the screenshot in prevous comment

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

Honestly, I think our new paper has serious implications for experimental econ
22–27% failed comprehension in the Dictator and Ultimatum games
In the Trust Game and Public Goods Game, that number hit 70% and 52%
These are foundational tools of exp econ
https://t.co/2MFW5hc96G
🧵

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

@JoLohse Sorry we should have referenced that paper. We tried our very very best to phrase the comprehension questions as straightforward as possible. Here is a screenshot of the instruction

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

@WEK204686 Yes. one of the main critiques we’ve gotten is that researchers often use various (undocumented) "tricks of the trade" to boost comprehension. It would definitely be interesting to systematically collect and test how effective those tricks actually are

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

@szarka @sharmutal https://t.co/rvrqcf81nm

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

@sharmutal hmm it is published open access in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization . If it gets more or less visitors than your onlyfans I don't know

[Gustav Tinghög @tinghog]

@sharmutal You clicked the link to the Open Science Framework where we have uploaded data, code and pre-registration. The actual paper is here: https://t.co/2MFW5hc96G