Matt dreams of the Garibaldi

NFFC
Anti-Capitalist, Atheist, "Lefty do-gooder" (better than a do-badder.. Right?), Brexiteer botherer, general gob-shite.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@Bibleknight04 @ChrisGeorgeBerg @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter The Ubaid culture 1st appeared around 6500bce.

A whole 2500yrs older than the Earth. Who would have thunk it?

The reason Judaism appropriated the mythology was because of how deep, rich and evolved it was after 4000yrs of development.

That's why the bible can be believable.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@bernardooooV3 @David_Ornstein @lauriewhitwell @TheAthleticFC We'll rinse you for that dollar then!!! Over £100m in profit.. Ta very much.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@Bibleknight04 @ChrisGeorgeBerg @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter @Bibleknight04
Anything to say about this?

You were so eager about everything else.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@Bibleknight04 @ChrisGeorgeBerg @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter https://t.co/QaIEkJ42V1

https://t.co/AE21kad1ja

https://t.co/455ocFPIr2

https://t.co/rWNN8aG4Wb

https://t.co/7Rxdtzc68x

https://t.co/YUsuicfq4U

Sources for each of my claims.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@Bibleknight04 @ChrisGeorgeBerg @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter Eh?

What part of our discussion lead you to believe that I could possibly agree with this question?

God made nobody, on account of my not believing in him.

God is an appropriated mythology turned in to a monotheistic deity for a tool of manipulation, subjugation and coercion.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@Bibleknight04 @ChrisGeorgeBerg @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter The Jews were never with God. They created a religion based on the Sumerian one but changed it to a monotheistic religion instead of a pantheon and that's why some stories contradict.
Early Judaism still had a pantheon but whittled it down to only Yhwh. Elohim etc.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@Bibleknight04 @ChrisGeorgeBerg @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter And this is why I laughed..

Sumerian Kings list goes back 240,000yrs.

The idea of long life in the Torah came from Sumerian/Ubaid culture again.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@Bibleknight04 @ChrisGeorgeBerg @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter Did you read the other posts under this?

They show why I laughed.

969yrs is nothing...
Try 28,000yrs for a Sumerian King.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@ChrisGeorgeBerg @Bibleknight04 @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter I did not know that ST Pauls has owt to do with whoever in your hell Scott Hahns is. I don't really care to be honest.

Look in to Sumerian history and mythology and see how close your religion aligns.

Judaism stole and repurposed pretty much all of the mythology. Muting you now

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@ChrisGeorgeBerg @Bibleknight04 @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter So, i'll go with the general concensus of between 40 - 90yrs after Jebus darklord of arbitrary nonsense's death.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@ChrisGeorgeBerg @Bibleknight04 @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter "I quoted from you the article. Which is from Scott Hahns organization."

I have no idea what you referring to. I think I'm getting tired.. Been arguing on here for 12 fucking hours and I've had enough to be honest

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@ChrisGeorgeBerg @Bibleknight04 @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter They haven't proven the dates to be earlier. They have supporting evidence to suggest so but can't actually prove it.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@ChrisGeorgeBerg @Bibleknight04 @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter You're misinformed because your source is ONLY the bible..

Supporting evidence isn't actual evidence. Supporting evidence is used for the basis of a theory. Once you've more conclusive evidence you can say you have proof.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@ChrisGeorgeBerg @Bibleknight04 @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter "Jonathan Bernier summarizes some of the latest evidence in support of an earlier dating of all four Gospels."

There is evidence supporting earlier dates, not conclusive. It doesn't place it at earlier dates the evidence he sights supports it.

It could be earlier.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@ChrisGeorgeBerg @Bibleknight04 @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter Matt - modern biblical scholarship widely considers the gospel to be an anonymous composition written between 80–90 CE, likely by an unknown Jewish-Christian author

Use google like everyone else.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@ChrisGeorgeBerg @Bibleknight04 @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter Gospel of Mark - the gospel is anonymous and research on its authorship has been inconclusive.

The book of the Gospel of Luke is technically anonymous, as the writer never identifies himself.

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@ChrisGeorgeBerg @Bibleknight04 @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter No.. The article says.. The date's are what I said.. But this study COULD mean they're slightly older.

Reading not a strong suit?

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@Bibleknight04 @ChrisGeorgeBerg @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter Missed a zero from 300+*

[Matt dreams of the Garibaldi @tinitus303]

@Bibleknight04 @ChrisGeorgeBerg @BrowntownBrew @ArkEncounter The Sumerian Kings list, some of which lived 300+yrs goes back 240,000yrs.