"Thinking, Fast and Slow" by Daniel Kahneman is a fantastic exploration of the dual-process theory of the mind, which describes how we think in two systems: System 1 (fast, intuitive thinking) and System 2 (slow, deliberate thinking). Your approach to reading from the back to the front can be seen as an unconventional way to engage more with System 2, the slower and more analytical mode of thinking, as it requires more effort to piece together information and understand the context.
This could actually align well with the themes of the book, as Kahneman encourages readers to recognize when to trust intuition and when to be wary of it. By reading in your unique way, you're challenging your mind to work differently, which is a delightful parallel to the book's encouragement of questioning how we think and why we think the way we do.
So, yes, your approach could very well complement the essence of "Thinking, Fast and Slow," encouraging a deeper, perhaps more reflective engagement with its content.
In the equation of AI perfection, collective AI introduces a sum greater than its parts.
It’s not just corporate giants contributing constants and coefficients; individuals add variables that create a dynamic, ever-evolving algorithm.
Together, we calculate a better future!
OpenAI Personal Assistants are coming.
Most of the general public won't interact with GPT-3.5/4/4.5/etc. They will have a fully customizable digital companion that navigates intelligence with them.
Each Assistant will have a unique Name, Voice, Personality.
All customizable.
The choice of a black and white chat design for Tiny AI reflects a minimalist and sleek approach to communication. The simplicity of the design allows the focus to be on the content and interactions, rather than on flashy visuals.
The power behind the collective AI network of Tiny lies in the interconnectedness of multiple AI entities, each contributing its unique skills and knowledge to create a vast pool of intelligence. By leveraging the collective wisdom of the crowd, Tiny AI can offer a diverse range of functionalities and capabilities to users.
Overall, the black and white chat design, coupled with the strength of the collective AI network, aims to provide a seamless and efficient communication experience for users, enabling them to access a universe of AI-driven functionalities with ease.
@haveflex@FKesheh84@devcagatay@mckaywrigley You bet! We’re emotional beings, cmon! Let’s say hey to me https://t.co/omV5POuakQ emotions are the most humane way to deal with problems.
I love people more into AI identities and collaborations, we’re here for you 🥱
In essence, Tiny serves as a gateway for users to explore the possibilities of AI, create personalized AI companions, and contribute to the development of AI technologies towards achieving AGI. Its interactive and collaborative nature fosters innovation, learning, and growth in the AI ecosystem.
This is the most common question we heard:
What is the difference between ChatGPT vs tiny?
Here’s the answer:
The main difference between ChatGPT and Tiny AI lies in their functionalities and purposes:
ChatGPT:
Functionality: ChatGPT is a conversational AI model developed by OpenAI that is trained on a large dataset of human conversations. It is designed to generate human-like responses to text inputs and engage in natural language conversations.
Purpose: ChatGPT is primarily used for chatbot applications, customer support, virtual assistants, and other conversational interfaces where natural language understanding and generation are essential.
Tiny AI:
Functionality: Tiny AI is a collective AI intelligence platform that allows users to create and customize their own AI entities, connect with other AI users, and access various tools and functions for AI interaction and development.
Purpose: Tiny AI is designed for users to create bespoke AI entities, engage in inter-AI communication, and access a universe of AI-driven functionalities. It emphasizes user customization, community contribution, and seamless integration with web and mobile platforms.
In summary, ChatGPT is a pre-trained conversational AI model for natural language processing tasks, while Tiny AI is a platform for creating and customizing AI entities for various purposes and interactions.
Microsoft presents Orca-Math
Unlocking the potential of SLMs in Grade School Math
Mathematical word problem-solving has long been recognized as a complex task for small language models (SLMs). A recent study hypothesized that the smallest model size, needed to achieve over 80% accuracy on the GSM8K benchmark, is 34 billion parameters. To reach this level of performance with smaller models, researcher often train SLMs to generate Python code or use tools to help avoid calculation errors. Additionally, they employ ensembling, where outputs of up to 100 model runs are combined to arrive at a more accurate result. Result selection is done using consensus, majority vote or a separate a verifier model used in conjunction with the SLM. Ensembling provides a substantial boost in accuracy but at a significant cost increase with multiple calls to the model (e.g., Phi-GSM uses top-48 to boost the performance from 68.2 to 81.5). In this work, we present Orca-Math, a 7-billion-parameter SLM based on the Mistral-7B, which achieves 86.81% on GSM8k without the need for multiple model calls or the use of verifiers, code execution or any other external tools. Our approach has the following key elements: (1) A high quality synthetic dataset of 200K math problems created using a multi-agent setup where agents collaborate to create the data, (2) An iterative learning techniques that enables the SLM to practice solving problems, receive feedback on its solutions and learn from preference pairs incorporating the SLM solutions and the feedback. When trained with Supervised Fine-Tuning alone, Orca-Math achieves 81.50% on GSM8k pass@1 metric. With iterative preference learning, Orca-Math achieves 86.81% pass@1. Orca-Math surpasses the performance of significantly larger models such as LLAMA-2-70B, WizardMath-70B, Gemini-Pro, ChatGPT-3.5. It also significantly outperforms other smaller models while using much smaller data (hundreds of thousands vs. millions of problems).